New York City Strikes Again

Status
Not open for further replies.

longeyes

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
7,227
Location
True West...Hotel California
August 23, 2003

Council Seeks to Toughen Gun Controls

By WINNIE HU

in the aftermath of the shooting last month of Councilman James E. Davis, the City Council is pushing ahead with several
changes in New York City's gun-control laws that would make the laws, already among the toughest in the nation, more
restrictive.

The Council will hold a committee hearing on Sept. 12 on at least half a dozen bills that, if approved, would seek not only to
restrict how gun makers and dealers conduct business in New York City but also to counter a growing movement across the
nation to roll back gun-control measures.

The proposals include holding gun makers, dealers and importers liable for damages if their weapons are used to kill or injure
people in the city, as well as prohibiting gun dealers from selling more than one firearm to the same person within 90 days.
Another proposal would require gun owners in the city to obtain liability insurance.

While these gun-control proposals are not new, many Council members say they have taken on new urgency since nearly all 51
members witnessed the shooting of one of their own at City Hall on July 23. Mr. Davis, 41, of Brooklyn, was gunned down by a
political rival, Othniel Boaz Askew, in the Council chamber after Mr. Davis escorted him past City Hall metal detectors.

"There was no urgency prior to the shooting," said Peter Vallone Jr., chairman of the Public Safety Committee, which is holding
next month's hearing.

"But now there is a sense that we all want to move as quickly as possible on these bills in his memory."

The city's renewed focus on gun control is also expected to open the door for broader state legislation, in much the same way
that the city's ban on smoking in restaurants and other public places did.

"I think it would be a good thing if the city did it, and showed the state the way," said the Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver,
who represents the Lower East Side.

In 2000, spurred partly by the Columbine school shootings, Gov. George E. Pataki and the state legislators passed a broad
package of gun-control laws that included raising the minimum age for obtaining a handgun permit to 21, requiring trigger locks
on new handguns and establishing a statewide "ballistic fingerprinting" database, among other things. But that was an unusual
moment of consensus.

Assembly Democrats have tended to propose sweeping gun-control measures. Senate Republicans have criticized the measures
as overly broad and unfair to hunters and others who use guns legally, preferring instead to increase penalties for those who use
guns in crimes.

"We support the federal Constitution in terms of the right to bear arms, but we have taken action to pass reasonable laws," said
John McArdle, a spokesman for the Senate majority leader, Joseph L. Bruno.

New York City's gun-control measures have long been more restrictive than those in the rest of the state. For instance, the city
requires people to obtain a permit to possess a shotgun or rifle, whereas the state requires a license only for handguns, not for
long guns.

In addition, the city sued various gun makers in 2000, claiming that illegally obtained firearms that wound up in New York City
were a public nuisance and that the manufacturers contributed to the nuisance with their marketing practices. The case is pending
in federal court, city officials say.

Patrick Brophy, a director of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, said the city's seeming intolerance for firearms
reflected the social and political culture in Manhattan and other parts of the city where relatively few residents hunted, shot or
owned guns.

"They don't have a day-to-day familiarity with guns anymore like they have with, say, cars," he said. "Guns are a useful tool, but
many people have no understanding of that tool anymore, and what they don't know, they fear."

Mr. Brophy said the group was closely watching the progress of the proposals in the Council.

Increasingly, the city's gun-control efforts have contrasted with those by other states and by federal officials. Congress is divided
over renewing a 1994 law that bans the manufacture of assault weapons. The House of Representatives has also passed a bill
that would block states and cities from suing gun makers for misuse of their weapons by others, and the Senate is considering the
proposal.

The City Council, however, has shown little hesitation in siding against gun enthusiasts. For instance, in 2000, when the National
Rifle Association proposed building a theme restaurant and game arcade in Times Square, the Council passed a resolution urging
the group not to come.

The Council speaker, Gifford Miller, said that next month's hearing would address various security issues involving guns. "My
hope is that out of the hearing process the Council will put forward gun-control measures that limit as much as possible the
number of guns on the streets," he said.

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, too, has been described by his aides as "pro-gun control." In response to a question at a news
conference, the mayor said, "I don't know why people carry guns. Guns kill people."

Even if New York City adopted even stricter gun-control laws, advocates on both sides of the issue question whether that would
reduce violent crimes because so many guns are brought in from other states.

Last year, the New York Police Department seized 4,065 guns from people who had obtained them illegally or used them in
crimes. More than half of those were subsequently traced to out-of-state sales, according to police records. The .40-caliber
handgun that Mr. Askew used to shoot Mr. Davis was legally bought out of state, police officials said.

"New York City is really at the mercy of other states' weak gun laws," said Jim Kessler, policy and research director for
Americans for Gun Safety, a nonprofit advocacy group in Washington. "It's difficult to pass a stricter law that would have an
effect because the guns are being smuggled in from other states."

Councilman Vallone acknowledged the problem of illegal guns from out of state but said he believed that tightening the city's
gun-control laws would make a difference.

"People all over the country watch what New York City does, and we intend to show leadership on this issue," he said.

Councilman David Yassky, who has lobbied for more gun-control measures, said that before the shooting, it had been "an uphill
battle" to make gun control a legislative priority because the city's budget crisis was all many council members could focus on.

But he added that "certainly the shooting at City Hall opened their eyes to the gun problem in a very dramatic way."
 
Very glad I don't live in New York anymore. I have no desire to even visit the city again in my lifetime.

I might make an exception for upstate.
 
If the mayor of New York City believes guns kill people, he can turn his own personal guns in as well as those of his bodyguards and the entire NYPD. Instead, I would want him to carry a very large bright orange sign "I AM UNARMED" around NYC.

The firearms of NYPD will be sent to where they do not kill anyone--my armoury in my basement. I will then divide them up to needy THR members.

It's, all together now, FOR THE CHILDREN.
 
The Council will hold a committee hearing on Sept. 12 on at least half a dozen bills that, if approved, would seek not only to
restrict how gun makers and dealers conduct business in New York City but also to counter a growing movement across the
nation to roll back gun-control measures.
DON'T JUST STAND THERE, WE MUST DO SOMETHING! Would any of the proposals have prevented the shooting? Logic would indicate that if the answer is "no" then there is reason to suspect the proposed legislation.

But then again I tend to use logic.
 
"I've got a great idea. Instead of focusing on guns used by criminals to commit crimes; let's just crack down on legal, law-abiding gun owners who have no connection to gun crime whatsoever. By focusing 100% of our attention and resources on LEGAL gun owners, we can give the appearance that we are doing something about the 'gun problem' and at the same time, we can turn millions of gun owners(many of whom vote Republican anyway) into instant felons. Since many of our Democratic constituents have already seen the inside of a jail cell anyway, what's good for the goose is good for the gander."

I'm sure this conversation (or one much like it) has been heard in many democratic strategy sessions. The problem is that too many Americans have realized that gun control is a scam, pure and simple. How in the H**L did Al gore lose West Virginia and Tennessee? He lost these two key States by listening to the dolts that gave him the above advice. A very large percentage of New Yorkers are sheeple and can't see what's going on. Democrats WILL NOT GET TOUGH ON GUN CRIME AND RISK LOSING VOTERS. What concerns politicos in New York is the fact that entire families are affected when a family member gets an extended prison sentence for committing a crime with a gun. Almost invariably, it's an entire family of Democratic voters who will vouch that so-and-so was a good boy, was taking college classes, and didn't shoot that convenience store clerk in the back.

With the exception of states like New York, New Jersey, California, etc., the Nation is changing. The Democratic party is in deep trouble. We no longer elect politicians who are soft on crime and soft on Defense. Knee-jerk responses to shootings like the one in New York will only reinforce the soft on crime image and put their party in greater peril.
 
...many Council members say they have taken on new urgency since nearly all 51 members witnessed the shooting of one of their own at City Hall on July 23.

Another one of those ding-blasted, gosh-darned guns went on a shooting spree for no good reason in spite of all the laws that have been passed, so it's obvious more laws are needed.

I thought that was reserved only for politians in the PRK.

No, the idiocy requirement went national during the Snopes Clinton-Liar Gore régime.
 
So...lessee...guns are practically outlawed in NYC. And still bad stuff happens. So...does this mean that 1. gun control is a failure or 2. we need even more of it?

I mean, even if you buy into the idea, have you never heard of 'diminishing returns'? C'mon.

Mike
 
It's EXACTLY that kind of insulated, incestual political BS that drove me out of there....:cuss: ......and I WON'T go back!!!!!!:neener: :barf:
 
It just shows to go you that an anti-gun bigot is impervious to logic, fact, or reason. I think a reasonable, objective person would conclude from that NYC shooting that 'strict gun control' is utterly useless in controlling crime.
 
Some of the proposed legislation will also forbid off duty police from carrying. Only officers on duty will be allowed to be armed, of course this also ignores New York law that says off duty officers have a duty to respond.

The police oriented boards I'm familier with are up in arms about this, but strangly don't seem to mind that citizens will have their rights further restricted.
 
While the proposed legislation is remarkably stupid, why did it require one of the "elites" being killed for them to move on further gun control? Do "serfs" not get shot in NYC?
 
NYC has a high percentage of insane in the halls of power. IIRC, former mayor Dinkins called for stricter gun laws in response to a fatal stabbing!

Maybe it's the water . . .
 
The interesting thing to look at would be NYC's permit records and find out just how many of these gun-controllers on the City Council have a CCW.

I'll bet there's more than a few of them that do.

Hypocritical :cuss:
 
There is a hearing scheduled september 12th. I may be able to go. :fire:

Its nice to know that my government wont turn criminal in the future and kill us all, because they show so much respect now for my freedom.
 
I have to say that this actually makes me happy. NYC will continue to fall further into a socialist mrass and I will be only too happy to watch it from the sidelines.
 
"People all over the country watch what New York City does, and we intend to show leadership on this issue," he said.

Now I know that these people have no grasp on reality! The people living in the great hinterlands between the left coast and the right coast absolutely care nothing for what the city of New York does!
 
SOMEBODY up there remind them somehow that it was a POLITICIAN who killed his political opponent this time! Got to get the guns out of the hands of those dangerous politicians and their trigger happy body guards!:banghead:
 
""People all over the country watch what New York City does, and we intend to show leadership on this issue."
================================================


Yep. The whole country has watched what has transpired in NYC over the years. And having learned that NYC's methods don't work, state after state has expanded the right to carry.

Often, more is learned from failure than from success.

Nationwide, 2nd ammendment rights are expanding. And in part, we have NYC to thank! ;)
 
Maybe someone can correct me here, but are these regs that are being considered, such as liability insurance for premise licenses, illegal under the Sullivan Law?
I looked and I couldn't find any such immunities listed in the law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top