Newcomer with general questions .270 WIN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Big_Sloppy75

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
46
I hope I don't sound to ignorant, or annoying in general, but after doing some research I still have a few things I am unsure of. I plan to shoot 130 grain bullets, as that seems to have the most positive feedback in the .270 Winchester. I am stuck between The Barnes TTSX and Nosler Accu-bond, but any other suggestions are always welcome. As far as powders, I like the results with Hodgedon H4831SC and the IMR 4350 that Nosler has posted. The dies I don't understand a difference at all, and was hoping someone could help me with why they vary in price, and quality. I plan on strictly hunting Deer and Elk, as this rifle has prooved itself I just want to shoot the best I can out of it. All people and opinions are welcome and appreciated.
 
,270 Win

Hey Big Sloppy,

I thought I would take a stab at your questions. I load .270 and have found that the 130gr. AccuBond with H4831Sc is a good combo.

As for dies, I prefer Redding or Hornady. You can get a 3 die set that has a neck sizer and full length resizer. You can get more life out of your brass if you neck size, but always make sure the cartridge chambers easily.

Lets see what the other folks have to say.

-Steve
 
No high tech advice from me. I load for .270 also. I use the 150 gr nosler partitions & IMR 4350, just because I like the partition bullet. I use 130's (partitions again) for antelope. I prefer a heavier bullet if there is a chance of elk.

I have Redding dies and full length size every time. I know you can get more case life and probably better accuracy out of neck sizing, but I think full length resizing gives a more reliable feeding round. I get roughly 1 moa accuracy out of my loads which is plenty accurate at .270 ranges. I'll trade a touch of accuracy for reliable feeding.
 
I am a bit different than you guys in that years ago I bought out a reloader and ended up with about 25 boxes of Speer 130 Grand slams. I developed loads with them and H4350 that are 1/2 MOA or less at around 2,920 FPS. I find that is all I need as my shots are at most 125 YDS locally. I am going to watch this thread as I might try bettering this load somewhat. I am mulling over trying a box of the TTSX bullets to see how they work in my bone stock Savage.

Corrected VEL. I should look at things closely when tired.
 
Last edited:
Boy, I'd like to run my 270 at 29,200 FPS!!!

On a serious note, a lot of people really think the hornady 140btsp is excellent. I can't argue. Some say the 150gr hornady spire point is the poor man's partition, but I've never shot it out of mine. I recently got a steal on some Speer 150btsp and they're looking to shoot well, but I'm still getting my load finalized.

You can't go wrong with the 270...and I'd think that either of the two you mentioned will cover any ground you're planning to cover.
 
I finally found a load using Barnes 140 TSX in front of 58 grains H4831. It is a hunting rifle and will shoot MOA so that works plenty for me. I shot a bear w/ that load last fall. I topped the rifle w/ a Burris C4+ scope so I have the customize elevation turret. I am very happy with this round although I kinda wish I had started with a 130 gr TSX. I load using Lee dies. Oh yea...it's a .270.
 
Of the two bullets you mentioned I would load the one that is most accurate in your rifle. I like Nosler bullets but Barnes bullets are also great for hunting.

Neck Sizing is good for target rifles and the long distance game but IMO all hunting ammo should be full length resized. If you want longer brass life annealing works well.
 
My rifle doesn't care the brand or design of the bullet at all. Feed it 130 gr from the cheap stuff up to the premium stuff and it all prints very very well. It typically sees Hornady ballistic tips, but it has also seen some speer, Sierra, and a box of barnes. I couldn't tell much difference, neither could the whitetail.
 
Both will work. The TTSX is a better elk bullet, they tend to penetrate deeper, but need to impact at around 2000-2200 fps to ensure good expansion. That means they are less effective at longer ranges where speed has slowed. But you'll be at or beyond 400 yards before speed drops off that much. The 130 TTSX might be the best choice for 1 bullet to do it all. With conventional bullets I'd suggest a heavier bullet for game larger than deer.

The Accubond will still expand down to 1800 fps, maybe a bit slower so it's the better long range bullet if you plan on shooting farther than about 400 yards.
 
A word to the Wise...

;)Get yourself a stuck case remover..:uhoh:

Short story:

I have loaded for over 40 years, .22 Hornet-45-70 Govt.
I use a few different lubes with GOOD dies (Dillon, Redding, RCBS). Some calibers, for me, work best with different lubes. For Hi-pressure sizeing Imperial Size Wax has ALWAYS come through.--EXCEPT on .270 Win.:(

Out of the first 10 or so cases stuck 3..:(:(

I found that the old RCBS case lube (like STP engine oil additive) on a case lube pad was the ONLY lube that would not stick the .270 Win. cases...

Yes, I know--Different strokes for Different folks, but that was my experience...Bill.:)
 
Hey thanks all who answered, I guess my homework was solid! I'll keep ya posted on how they shoot if you other guys on here want some data on different bullets and possibly powder.
 
Big_Sloppy75:

What rifle are you shooting? Is it a bolt, pump, autoload?

The combination of H4831 or H4831SC, with a 130 grain projectile is solid. I use 60 grains. I prefer to, whenever I can, to use Bench Rest primers for the added consistency, especially in bolt rifles. Don't overlook Hornady's SST projectiles. They hit like a freight train. :) Also, check Hornady's 130 grain GMXs.

As to dies, if you are running a bolt, check out Lee's Collet dies. Keep a full-length die on hand for when the brass begins to get a bit long, then full-length resize it. Neck-size-only dies will make your brass last longer, and give better groups.

JMHO,

Geno
 
IMR 4350 has produced excellent results for me with bullets from 100 grains to 150.
Lyman & RCBS .270 Win. dies have done their job for me too.
For that BLR, you sure don't need to spend money on a neck sizer die.
 
The price difference between die manufacturers lies in capabilities, options, adjustment versatility and the coating on the dies. IMO there is no difference in quality. I use Lee, Lyman, RCBS, and Hornady dies. No redding dies yet. Way outta my league. For hunting rounds Lee dies will suit you fine, and as a beginner infinite adjustability lends itself to mistakes and questioning your loads.
I am a die hard Nosler fan. Barnes makes a good bullet but I'm biased, I like Nosler.
4350 is a very versatile powder.
I no longer have my .270 (pre-64 model 70) and I regret that every single day. I have been looking for another. Great round. I have wondered where it went? Not as popular as it once was. Interesting side note, the .270 Win parent case is not the 30.06 contrary to popular belief. It's the 30.03

Best regards and happy, safe loading
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top