sharpshooter74
Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 106
http://www.newsweek.com/id/191414
Just thought I'd share some of the idiot quotes I saw in the comments below the article. These people really need to be educated.
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:38:43 AM
However, when the constituion was written, people did not have access to hand held machine guns. No citizen has any business or right to have those. It's absurd.
Posted By: vstillwell @ 03/30/2009 5:38:09 PM
this is ridiculous. i'm a gun owner. i don't own freakin' assault weapons. assault weapons have one purpose: to kill people. why are they legal? i don't care if red necks like them. ban them!
Posted By: txdoc @ 03/30/2009 7:47:37 PM
A) the liberal press wants to label any firearm the do not like an 'Assault weapon', this is simply for emotional affect.
B) true assault weapons (full auto or select fire) are already severely restricted in this country.
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:46:44 AM
Are you kidding me "severely restricted"???? Come to Utah and see how easy it is. I can walk into my local gun shop and buy a semi-automatic machine gun with no background check. I just have to have a UT state ID that says I'm 18....severely restricted? Do your homework before you post more redneck bull$hit
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:42:49 AM
I guarantee if when the constitution was written, if hand held machine guns were widely available, our founding fathers would have had enough sense to clarify the right to bear arms. You are obviously a red neck blinded by the NRA/Limbaugh types. As Americans we will ALWAYS have the right to bear arms, but as citizens we have no business owning semi/automatic machine guns.
Posted By: Brien Comerford @ 03/30/2009 8:45:54 PM
The first step is to ban cruel and unhumane hunting. Then ban all firearms. If any person is found with a firearm put them in prison for decades.
Just thought I'd share some of the idiot quotes I saw in the comments below the article. These people really need to be educated.
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:38:43 AM
However, when the constituion was written, people did not have access to hand held machine guns. No citizen has any business or right to have those. It's absurd.
Posted By: vstillwell @ 03/30/2009 5:38:09 PM
this is ridiculous. i'm a gun owner. i don't own freakin' assault weapons. assault weapons have one purpose: to kill people. why are they legal? i don't care if red necks like them. ban them!
Posted By: txdoc @ 03/30/2009 7:47:37 PM
A) the liberal press wants to label any firearm the do not like an 'Assault weapon', this is simply for emotional affect.
B) true assault weapons (full auto or select fire) are already severely restricted in this country.
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:46:44 AM
Are you kidding me "severely restricted"???? Come to Utah and see how easy it is. I can walk into my local gun shop and buy a semi-automatic machine gun with no background check. I just have to have a UT state ID that says I'm 18....severely restricted? Do your homework before you post more redneck bull$hit
Posted By: Palin who? @ 03/31/2009 11:42:49 AM
I guarantee if when the constitution was written, if hand held machine guns were widely available, our founding fathers would have had enough sense to clarify the right to bear arms. You are obviously a red neck blinded by the NRA/Limbaugh types. As Americans we will ALWAYS have the right to bear arms, but as citizens we have no business owning semi/automatic machine guns.
Posted By: Brien Comerford @ 03/30/2009 8:45:54 PM
The first step is to ban cruel and unhumane hunting. Then ban all firearms. If any person is found with a firearm put them in prison for decades.