"Nobody NEEDS an AR15!!" (crime stats)

[joeschmoe]

Many countries DO regulate/restrict who can get training in Martial Arts and then require registration of the person as a "weapon". You need permission to be allowed to train, then you are treated like a convicted sex offender forever after.

If they did somehow manage to ban all guns here, that would be next. There is no end to their scapegoating and silliness.

 

[somerandomguy]

Many countries DO regulate/restrict who can get training in Martial Arts and then require registration of the person as a "weapon". You need permission to be allowed to train, then you are treated like a convicted sex offender forever after.

If they did somehow manage to ban all guns here, that would be next. There is no end to their scapegoating and silliness.

Hands/Feet/Fists: 745 murders per year. Are you kidding me? We already are weapons. If the current climate is any indicator, we'll be banning martial arts for making people into assault weapons.

 

[joeschmoe]

That's exactly what would happen. It already has in other countries. They want the peasants to be completely powerless.

ETA; My current answer to why I need an AR is;


"In case someone tries to take my rights".

 

[Inebriated]

Lets be honest here. This is not about making people safe. Its about disarming the American Citizen.

Well of course.

 

[HOWARD J]

I would rather have an AKM

 

[Hacker15E]

Rosa Parks didn't NEED to sit at the front of the bus.

Be careful with the handgun/rifle comparisons. Remember, 30 years ago, the focus WAS on handguns. They want ALL guns. They are just attacking them in different stages.

The only reason they aren't going after handguns anymore is because of Heller.

Here's what we'll known anti Chuck Schumer says about it:

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...29421_1_gun-debate-gun-safety-laws-gun-owners

Before Heller, the goal of some gun-control activists was an outright ban on handguns. Heller removes that possibility for good. Progressives should move on and work within the ruling. This means no longer harboring ideas of a future liberal majority on the court someday overturning Heller.