Northern California: political activity Thursday AM in Sacramento - be there!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jim March

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
8,732
Location
SF Bay Area
Folks,

Some of you know I've been tracking the Diebold vote fraud scandal in some detail. If not, check out my letters to the California Secretary of State at:

http://www.equalccw.com/voteprar.html

Extreme short form: Diebold sells the hardware and software to vote with, to county governments. The security of same is so bad, it seems highly likely this turkey was rigged for vote fraud. Internal memos have been leaked showing the %$#^@s laughing about it amongst themselves :rolleyes:. It's *bad*, OK?

Well on Thursday at 10:00am, the "voting certification panel" will be meeting to, supposedly, make a decision on whether or not to keep this Diebold crapola in the state.

Here's the meeting schedule and agenda:

http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/vsp_011504.pdf

California SecState main office:
1500 11th Street
1st Floor - Auditorium
Sacramento, CA 95814

If you're catching the SacCity light rail system, it's smack dab at the Archives Plaza light rail station, and one block from the state capitol building.

Recent events: the SecState's office started an audit on the Diebold hardware and software pieces in use among the 17 counties that have bought Diebold gear. Each component and software version is supposed to be "certified" - approved by the Federal Election Commission via testing labs, then tested and approved by the Calif SecState.

Of the 17 counties, NOT ONE was using a completely legal set of components. Swear to God. Diebold had been installing whatever they want with no oversight. Total nightmare, and totally illegal.

They need to be voted off the island - de-certified for use in the entire state. They've been stalling the decision while seeking "more data" but every time more data comes in, the situation looks even worse. SecState Shelley is on record as saying he "doesn't want to de-certify Diebold, but he'll go down that road if he has to" - in an unprecidented public speech to the voting cert panel during the last meeting in December of '03.

So far, these certification hearings have been sparsely attended. Only a handful of folks have been paying attention. That has to change. We need warm bodies, folks. Even if you're new to the issue, we need to fill that auditorium, we need to PROVE at a gut level that people are now paying attention and the SecState bureaucrats better do their jobs.

This is important enough that if you CAN take a day off work, do so. OK? This is for real, not a drill. Read over my open letters to the SecState, they form a decent short intro to the subject, (the longest is 7 pages, the shortest 4).

You can fill out a speaker card and comment if you like, or not. Doesn't matter that much, so long as we get BODIES. The room seats about 400, the most I've seen is maybe 35 and most of those are voting systems manufacturer's sales reps (virtually all of which used to be SecState elections division staff I kid you not). The most activists so far: about a dozen.

This is a call for reinforcements.

NOTE: this is a personal project of mine, not connected with CCRKBA.
 
Nope. Doesn't help - I found that right away, problem is there's no way to see any replies.

When I did a search for posts that had the word "sacramento" in the title organized by posting time, I didn't see it. So it looks like you posted it to "your area" but the general Freeper can't see it without looking for it.
 
You might contact the Freeper and/or College Republican groups at Sac State and UC Davis as well. Not sure if you can find them off the university web pages or not.
 
Jim:

Not much I can do from Greater Cleveland, except to hope that you can hold their slimy hides long enough to nail same to the wall, hanging out to Dry & twisting in the wind....

Good luck and warmest regards.....
 
Good luck Jim.

Diebold had a rep inside the polling place in Arlington VA last November. They were handing out surveys, and encouraging people to contact the county board on how easy the machines were to use.

I suggested that maybe she needed to be outside with the rest of the campaign workers, and the poll captain (I think that was his title) said that she was the technical rep, so she had to stay.

This reminds me, that I intended to look into how they got in there, to begin with.

Marty
 
For 15 years I was president of Genesis Microsystems Corporation, a company that developed and sold development tools for embedded computer systems. These voting systems are exactly the sort of thing that I worked with, day in and day out.

I can say, from long experience, that it's not a question of if video voting machines can be compromised, it's meerly a question of how quickly, and for how little money. I can give credible expert testimony to that fact.

I'd like to be at that hearing. However, I have a transportation conflict. It there's anyone going up from the Palo Alto area, might I possibly get a ride?
 
SO,any updates Jim?

Did the indy media blacbloc show up?
indy has about one or two good articles a year.
They outed Diane Fienstein for some stuff last year.
and they are into the diebold stuff as well.
most of the time they anger me.
 
After-action report:

Ye GODS the place was crowded. Normally, there's maybe a dozen activists TOPS at these things, we're generally outnumbered by all the various industry reps.

Not this time!

The room wasn't completely packed, but there was at LEAST 200 "regular folks"...probably more.

Short form: the panel decided to give Diebold one last chance, by forcing them to finish providing info for the current investigation PLUS provide documents regarding 10 new areas of investigation.

Of those 10, two were directly influenced by myself and Bev Harris: for the first time, Diebold is going to have to answer why they didn't do certification on the Windows CE custom operating system on the touchscreen terminals (see also my 2nd letter to the SecState, yellow table, right-hand column, http://www.equalccw.com/voteprar.html) and a similar issue with the smartcard programmer software which is also uncertified.

Diebold has 30 days to respond. The panel is almost 100% up-front in saying that a lack of response on this stuff will get Diebold booted from the state (and that will hurt 'em BAD, possibly drive 'em all the way out of the elections biz).

Now, there have been such delays announced before for various reasons. In at least one such previous case, the panel has refused to take public comment right then, stalling until the following meeting a month later and forcing people to drive back to put in spoken comments; THIS time, they damned well did take public comment, as it would have turned into a riot if they hadn't. People came from as far away as Santa Cruz and even Riverside...it would have been a desperate search for tar'n'feathers had we been silenced.

Well we weren't :). And that's all about the numbers of people who showed...they can screw over a handful of folks but not 200+.

Upshot: we've managed to influence the direction of questioning of Diebold into directions they are NOT ready to cope with! I think Diebold will try and shuffle and dance some more, and they're going to get yanked off-stage.

Remember: under CA law, if the panel revokes their current certification it won't stop that newly de-certified gear from being used in elections within six months of the de-cert. In other words, the panel by themselves cannot block the currently certified Diebold parts (original touchscreen, optical scan) from getting used in the primaries, and there's a deadline of early June to de-certify in order to block use in November. (There is another way of shutting down use of currently certified Diebold gear in the primaries: the courts.)

But, this latest delay means the new "TSx" hardware can't be used in the primaries. Diebold has shipped literally thousands of these to San Joaquin, Sonoma, Kern and...hell, I think San Diego(?) counties, who now can't use 'em in the primaries. Yes, Diebold has sold uncertified gear with the promise of certification.

As I'm writing this, the Sacramento 11:00pm news (chan. 3) covered today's meeting!!! They quoted Diebold CEO Wally O'Dell promising to "give Ohio's electoral votes to Bush in '04", covered the discovery of illegal Diebold versions installed in every customer-county in the state, and the concerns about hacking/security. A video pan of the room showed the massive crowd...which trust me folks, is by FAR the most people that panel had ever seen.

---------------

Another issue came up later that same session which I wasn't aware of:

Avante's certification was delayed yet again, based on their not having any California customers that would be impacted before the primaries. Avante has a GOOD product complete with workable voter-verified paper trail, yet has been stalled in cert since June of 2002.

The stated Avante "issue" today is that the panel and elections department of the SecState's office hasn't yet sorted out the "new rules" for paper-trail-equipped systems. But in reality, they've continuously shifted the rules for Avante for about a year and a half now, and they're getting *pissed off* for obvious reasons. The Avante rep expressed some of his disgust and while some of the crowd had gone home after Diebold's chunk ended, enough folks remained to give him thunderous applause afterwards.

Facts:

* Avante has never hired former elections/SecState staff/officials as "sales managers", vice presidents and the like, while ALL the established players (Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia) have done so.

* Avante's products are considered by Bev Harris, myself and others as being among the best and most honest stuff available, and were studied by a succession of SecState staff who then left the SecState's employ and jumped straight to Avante competitors with that info!. Avante folks are of course quietly furious but can't complain too loudly because of the "discretionary" nature of the panel's decisions.

(In my conversations with Avante rep John Byrne, we talked briefly about how I'm also a "gun nut" (grins all around) and I explained first about the discretionary abuse in CCW permit issuance, and how similar it is to the discretionary abuse his company is facing from this panel! As you can imagine, a little lightbulb went off over his head!)

My final comment spoken to Wired magazine reporter Kim Zetter is that Diebold's certification seems to be rushed through because they've sold uncertified product and now the counties are screwed if it isn't certified soon. Avante on the other hand hasn't sold uncertified products based on promises of future gov't certification - and are apparantly being punished on that basis.

:banghead:

It's also a widespread theory that the major players don't like Avante because it "shows them up" and have used lobbying tactics to slow down their cert while the other companies can catch up - while hiring gov't staff who have been studying the Avante product on the gov't's payroll. (Meanwhile Avante has promised all along to release their source code, pending some patent approvals. I think it's likely they'll do it, they're by far the "geekiest" of the elections companies :D.)

See also:

http://www.aitechnology.com/votetrakker2/products.html

(Fortunately, Avante isn't totally reliant on elections gear for survival - it's a sideline they got into after work done in personal-verification ID cards which are a convenient piece of the elections gear puzzle. They also do semi-conductor support products, flexible connectors, other such (why I said "geekiest")...so here's hoping they can survive the BS thrown their way.)

----------

Upshot: I think the massive public outcry will force the panel to stomp hard on Diebold, who I think will be booted soon. BUT the panel's treatment of Avante suggests deeper issues in progress and raise troubling questions about the whole certification process.
 
Last edited:
JIM!

Thats Great!
A lot of young black block ananrchist are pro gun.
Reaching out to them can add good dedicated people
to "our" side.
I should know! I used to be among the unwashed
torn jeans and circle A crowd.
(till I quit smoking weed and realized the lefty Anarch's
were being used by the commies and the dem's)
Now I am a right wing little c conservative anarchist.
I still love (old) punk rock
:cool:
I am glad some one has the "know how"
to reach out to the indy media types.
their lack of respect for fairness and due process
just irks me so much I can't communicate with them
even though I used to be one.
Thanks again Jim!
What you're doing is extremly important
and makes me feel like we can change things for the better!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top