Now that you know the NSA spies on americans, will that change your posting habits?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It changes nothing for me....I came into this world not giving a crap what other people think or say and i will go out the same way......I also know I am the last person that the FBI,DHS, NSA *cough*( KGB ) is ever going to be interested in. No matter what i say here or any other place!
 
How could someone be vehemently against infringement of the 2nd ammendment and lackadaisical about a complete violation of other constitutionally guaranteed rights? Just doesn't make sense to me. Constitutional law operates largely on precedent, and this is a pretty bad one if you ask me. If this administration is willing to spy on it's own citizens without due process, it would be foolish to think they give a d@mn about any of your other rights, least of all gun ownership.

- CM
 
Mad Chemist said:
Believing it ten years ago would have earned one a spot in the Tinfoil Hat Club.:cool:
Click to expand...


Well...I do know this much, for as long as thirty years or so: Let's just say that if you get far enough in the application process for the National Security Agency then you'll find out what they are capable of!
 
Maybe I got it wrong ...

As I understand it, they were monitoring calls from suspected terrorists originating outside the US. ...

<sigh>... never mind... it isn't worth it. Go ahead and believe that the Government is out to get you.
 
It changes nothing for me....I came into this world not giving a crap what other people think or say and i will go out the same way......I also know I am the last person that the FBI,DHS, NSA *cough*( KGB ) is ever going to be interested in. No matter what i say here or any other place!
Click to expand...

Coma, check out this FBI brochure that another member posted on line:

Page one: http://keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Front.jpg

Page two:http://keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Back.jpg

Note that you fit the profile if you consider yourself a "defender of the US Constitution" or if you "Make numerous references to US Constitution."

Now are you so sure that the "terrorist" being monitored is not you?
 
McCall911 said:
Well...I do know this much, for as long as thirty years or so: Let's just say that if you get far enough in the application process for the National Security Agency then you'll find out what they are capable of!
Click to expand...

But don't get me wrong.

I believe the NSA has done, and continues to do, far more good for our country than most people will ever realize. But, no, I don't believe the agency will be "out to get" any of us for voicing an opinion on a message board.
 
No not really

Then again, I remind myself each time I post that I am using my real name to keep me from putting my foot in my mouth (even though it still happens).

Being prudent with what you say on the internet is no different than deciding it's better to just shut your pie-hole in the middle of an angry mob.
 
From day one I have posted to the web only those things that would tend to make me look like a complete creampuff.

I assiduously watch my own posts so I do not dicusss the marijuana green house I set up in our basement that draws illegal power from the main power lines running over our back yard.

I also try to not talk about the computer hacking I have been doing on stolen US Government computers which I bought from some guy who stole them from Los Alimos National Laboratory in New Mexico. These are good computers too! I mean after I defragged their hard drives I was able to get atomic weapon plans which I was alble ot sell to the Al Queda terrorists in exchange for some nice full automatic rifles (of which I sold 3 of to my Meth Dealer).

The stolen USG computers are also very good for distributing child pornography but you can bet I wont talk aboput THAT in the clear either! No sir ree bob! If any police officers made it past my hand grenade protected back door (oh that boobytrap project idea came from my buds in the Crips - helpful guys) they would likely find me beating my wife with the body of our dog and I can not imagine the amount of trouble that might cause since her stepfather is the leader of the local Hells Angels and constantly talks about assasinating the pr...


Seriously however.... I think Pax put it best early in this thread.... I quote those words of absolute wisdom here: "When I started posting online, I figured that anything I said could easily be traced back to me, personally, by anyone who cared enough to put some legwork into it.

So I decided a long time ago to only post stuff I wouldn't mind saying in public, in person, to whomever I was talking to, with the whole world listening in. I figured I only had one reputation, regardless of what username I used, and I've acted accordingly. It's kept me out of a lot of grief.
 
Hahaha, you must be kidding.

They don't even give a ???? about Bin Laden already, you think they're gonna worry about me, come on now, don't be silly.

How do you think Bin Laden would have turned out inside these borders. Ask David Koresh or some of the folks from Ruby Ridge.

nuff said



jeepmor
 
They don't even give a ???? about Bin Laden already, you think they're gonna worry about me, come on now, don't be silly.
Click to expand...

They do give a Shiite about Bin Laden. They need him, and they need him alive and free so they can use him as a focal point to define this vague war on terror. Without Osama or the WOT, how would they trick us sheep into handing over our liberty?

If they wanted Bin Laden, they would have caught him. There is no possible way that our government could not have caught him if it had marshalled all its forces to do so. The only explanations that make sense are that either our government didn't really want to catch him or else our leaders are so mind-bogglingly inept that they shouldn't be managing a local Kwiki Mart, much less the world's most powerful country.
 
Lobotomy Boy said:
:eek:r else our leaders are so mind-bogglingly inept that they shouldn't be managing a local Kwiki Mart, much less the world's most powerful country.
Click to expand...

I suscribe to the above, but Hillery will get us straightened out shortly. :cuss:
 
I suscribe to the above, but Hillery will get us straightened out shortly.
Click to expand...

The best hope some Democratic twinkie like Hilary has for being elected is for the Republican party to continue refraining from holding its leaders responsible for their own ineptness.

The Republicans have less than a year to clean house or we're going to have a Democratic congress with the lamest of lame duck Republican presidents about this time next year. A Democratic congress will do much more harm than a Democratic president ever could.

You can keep telling yourself that this won't happen, but look at how far the Bush administration has fallen in just one year. What do you see happening in the future that makes you think this won't get anything but worse?
 
I disagree with the idea that Bin Laden is available and allowed to roam for political purposes.

A few years back a certain individual shot an abortion clinic doctor and, I believe, set an explosive near a clinic. He went up and hid in the hills in known territory in our own country, was possibly helped by associates for a while and eluded capture for a couple of years.

He was finally captured when he was found digging food out of a trash bin. Dunno what happened to the local support. Would not have been captured yet if he had support, though.

Right here in the good old US of A.

If we can't locate a criminal within the fully mapped US borders what makes it any easier to capture Bin Laden from behind a wall of local tribal supporters? The Pakistani government can't even go into some of these areas.
 
I got a message today from tower hobbies... The Warhead comes with $200 of hopups... :)

=========

They finally played Enemy of the State on TV over the weekend. I'm suprised they waited so long...
 
Last edited:
Whyworry about it?

I have always assumed that ATF or perhaps some other nouveau gestapo bureau of the government has been reading websites having to do with weapons as long as such sites have existed.

Listening to phone calls longer than that.

The government of this country bears no resemblance to the government the founders established.

If you expect minimal adherence to anything from our government, think again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
  • Locked
EFF disclosures in NSA/ATT spying case
Replies
2
Views
344
xd9fan
X
P
  • Locked
In the wake of the Kofi Annan bugging scandal, details emerge of Big Brother's spying
Replies
3
Views
417
7.62FullMetalJacket
7
R
  • Locked
Bush tells America "Watch your neighbor"
Replies
17
Views
993
mr.trooper
M
R
  • Locked
interesting program?
Replies
1
Views
359
Richmond
R
R
  • Locked
NSA Wiretaps / FISA Court
Replies
3
Views
461
Don Gwinn
D
Back
Top