HankB
Member
The September 2007 issue of American Rifleman magazine has a spread by field editor Wiley Clapp on a couple of Para-Ordnance .45s . . . these are billed as "Gun Rights" guns since for each one purchased PO will donate $25 to the NRA to fight to preserve the 2nd Amendment.
There were two things that struck me as funny in this article, the first being the assertion that Para-Ordnance - a Canadian company - has changed its name to "Para USA." Yet in the sidebars listing stats on the pistols, the manufacturer is still listed as Para-Ordnance of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. I guess Ontario is the 51st state, eh?
Okay, maybe its a typo, maybe the name change is TOO new to have percolated through all the literature.
But the second item I found amusing was Wiley Clapp's . . . creative . . . description of the pistols' performance; consider this gem:
Is it just me, or does the careful parsing in Clapp's statement fairly scream "Jammamatic?"
There were two things that struck me as funny in this article, the first being the assertion that Para-Ordnance - a Canadian company - has changed its name to "Para USA." Yet in the sidebars listing stats on the pistols, the manufacturer is still listed as Para-Ordnance of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. I guess Ontario is the 51st state, eh?
Okay, maybe its a typo, maybe the name change is TOO new to have percolated through all the literature.
But the second item I found amusing was Wiley Clapp's . . . creative . . . description of the pistols' performance; consider this gem:
Quite often, test reports in American Rifleman of other firearms - including .45s - either state there were no failures of any kind, or that there were "X" failures to feed or eject, or something of the sort.Wiley Clapp in American Rifleman said:. . . I ran a couple of boxes of 230-gr. ammuntion through the pistols to get a feel for them. Like many .45s, they are intolerant of anything less than a firm grasp, and they do need to be carefully broken-in. After a breaking-in period and postive lubrication, it was time to do a Ransom Rest evaluation . . . I can commend the guns to you from the standpoint of inherent accuracy and general handling.
Is it just me, or does the careful parsing in Clapp's statement fairly scream "Jammamatic?"