OHIO: Taft backs concealed-carry bill

Status
Not open for further replies.

WAGCEVP

Member
Joined
May 26, 2003
Messages
864
"• Guns in cars must be locked away if the car contains a child under age 18. Otherwise, the gun must either be locked away or in a holster in plain sight. "

Careful, this is what they tried on us this year, it's "child endagerment"..............



....................................................................................
Taft backs concealed-carry bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latest version overcomes obstacles

By Jim Siegel
Gannett Columbus Bureau


COLUMBUS - Reversing years of opposition, Gov. Bob Taft has agreed to support a bill that permits Ohioans to carry concealed handguns.

The governor's backing came after two major law enforcement groups, for the first time, dropped their opposition. The measure passed unanimously in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

The full Senate was prepared to vote today, but the National Rifle Association, which has backed legislation to permit concealed weapons, informed GOP leaders it was pulling its support from the bill until it could study it..

Senate President Doug White, R-Manchester, said he has given the NRA 24 hours to examine the measure.

"I support the bill very strongly that we have today," he said.

The proposal requires county sheriffs to issue concealed handgun permits to anyone age 21 or over who passes a criminal background check and completes a 12-hour training course.

Without an NRA endorsement, White questions whether his Republican members would vote for the bill. The NRA also has a lot of influence in the House, which must agree with any bill adopted by the Senate.

"Certainly if the NRA doesn't support the bill, I wouldn't be in favor of it," said Rep. Jim Aslanides, R-Coshocton, sponsor of the bill.

Since taking office in 1998, Taft, a Republican, has opposed concealed weapons bills introduced in two sessions of the Legislature. He said he could not support any bill that was opposed by law enforcement groups.

The Fraternal Order of Police, the state's largest police union, and the Buckeye State Sheriffs Association, whose members would issue the permits, previously dropped their opposition.

However, the Ohio State Highway Patrol and the Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police have remained opposed.

The patrol now is neutral because the bill was changed Tuesday to better protect officers confronting motorists they have pulled over, said Capt. John Born, a patrol spokesman.

In vehicles, guns would have to be in plain sight in a holster or locked in the glove compartment or a container. If children were present, the gun would have to be locked away. The original version had no restrictions.

Motorists also would have to tell officers immediately if they were carrying weapons, which wasn't required in previous proposals.

Taft said he would support it despite the continued opposition of the police chiefs. He said it reflects his positions on safety, training and the support or neutrality of law enforcement on the bill.

"Our understanding is the bill is satisfactory to our position on all those points," Taft said. "If a bill like that came to my desk, I would sign it."

Aslanides said he could support the bill if people who believed there was an immediate threat to their lives were allowed to carry weapons without permits.

"I can't sponsor a bill that puts citizens of Ohio at risk," he said.

Doug Joseph, state director for the Gun Owners of America, called the measure a gun owner registration bill that won't allow people to defend themselves.

"Gun owners really are getting the shaft," he said.

Meanwhile, Toby Hoover, director of the Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence, said the new bill attempted to address some concerns but is still a problem. "The bill is still about politics," she said. "Carrying guns will, plain and simple, not make Ohioans safer," she said.

The debate continues as the Ohio Supreme Court considers a Hamilton County case challenging the constitutionality of the state's ban on concealed weapons. Two lower courts have ruled the law banning the carrying of weapons without "legitimate reasons" is unconstitutional.

Gun bill at a glance

• Sheriffs would be responsible for issuing concealed handgun permits. Cost may not exceed $45.

• Applicant must be at least 21 and pass a criminal background check, which includes fingerprinting.

• Applicant must complete a 12-hour gun competency course. At least two hours must be live firing.

• Guns cannot be carried into police stations, jails, MR/DD centers, courthouses, school safety zones, places serving alcohol, churches, child care centers, universities, aircraft or public buildings.

• Private property owners can restrict gun possession.

• Guns in cars must be locked away if the car contains a child under age 18. Otherwise, the gun must either be locked away or in a holster in plain sight.

• If stopped while in a vehicle, the driver must inform the officer immediately that there is a loaded gun in the car.
 
Since taking office in 1998, Taft, a Republican, has opposed concealed weapons bills introduced in two sessions of the Legislature. He said he could not support any bill that was opposed by law enforcement groups.

I wouldn't care to live in a state whose "law enforcement groups" dictate terms to the governor.

Never—ever—trust a R.I.N.O.!
 
:::::Meanwhile, Toby Hoover, director of the Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence, said the new bill attempted to address some concerns but is still a problem. "The bill is still about politics," she said. "Carrying guns will, plain and simple, not make Ohioans safer," she said.::::::

well she has one thing right, it is politics
but if she doesnt feel safer carrying a gun then she doesnt have to
or perhaps she would feel better moving to Chicago, where this kind of bill will probably never happen.......::::sigh::::
some people,.... dont trust themselves with a gun, so no one else gets one either!
 
I love how Taft backs a bill that oppresses the rights of his constituents more than the current laws.

The state Senate is no better than Taft as they were the ones that introduced all the crap into an otherwise "OK" CCW bill.

God, how I hate the pseudo-Republicans in this state!:mad: :cuss:
 
I still say accept the bill and the progress we have made with the public statement that the bill as presented is unjust and we intend to put maximum pressure on the legislators in the future to make corrections. Like it or not politics operate this way, in small steps not giant leaps. The support to do anything else just is not there at this time. I don't like the restrictions on where you can carry, yet everyone seems to be only upset with CCW in an automobile. What about ALL the public buildings and private property ( shopping malls and stores, ect.) that are banned from CCW. That just about leaves only my home and the woods, come to think about it, this bill is a joke for CCW!:cuss: The NRA should withdraw their support and target those up for election who do not support a "real" CCW bill. :fire:
 
If the Ohio Supreme Court does their job and rules on the letter of the law, the whole issue would be moot.

However, they will not legislate from the bench (tho it's warranted).

I have said all along, this state will not see a reasonable CCW. I pray for it, I urge my representatives, but mark my words Ohio is not going to let it happen.

This state, our professional sports teams, our weather, and our polititians suck and always will.
 
The bill sucks
The Ohio state patrol sucks
Taft sucks
Toby Hoover sucks
[sarcasm] Just what we need. Kiddie CCW [/sarcasm]
 
I spent some time in Florida when the rash of carjackings/assualts against individuals using rental cars was at it's height.

What was never publicly acknowledged (but widely know within LE) was criminals realized that foreign visitors and/or out-of-staters were far less likely to be a card carrying/pistol carrying CCW resident of FL and it made their criminal activity less dangerous to them.

With that vehicle provision in the Ohio bill, the OHP has just created a "safer" target of opportunity for the BG's.....adult men and women in vehicles with minor childen. I hope that Ohio residents take the "holster in plain sight" route and not lock their firearm up.

I am so disappointed with OHP. WORDS, on PAPER, never protect(or make safer) anyone.

regards
 
RCS,
The problem is that if you have children, then the holster in plain sight is not an option...with kids 18 or younger in the car the gun must be locked away. :cuss: :fire: :fire: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:


Mark
 
I do not have faith that the OH Sup Ct will do the right (or even correct) thing. :(

Anyway, How many holsters will we have to wear? One to keep it concealed, one to keep it exposed (in a car) or maybe a dash-mounted holster rig?

This is crazy! :fire:
 
It sucks, but...

And IMO, it's worse than the 25 year old limit in Missouri. :(

However, don't cut off your noses to spite your face, take what you get, then fix it later. The logic of mothers and cars with children being targeted for crime will be hard to fight and it will be a much smaller change then getting the bulk of CCW passed. The reforms could be submitted as soon as next year.

The anti's never try to get us in one fell swoop either, and conservatives tend to lose because they'll fall on thier swords on principle for the all or nothing attitude we often all have. There's been tons of CCW liberalizing and reforms going on in the states that have passed it in the last few years, and now that your foot is in the door, I really don't think you should take it out.

Good luck.
 
From Packing.org:

The Ohio House has rejected the Senate's version of House Bill 12 by a vote of 83-5.
 
The patrol now is neutral because the bill was changed Tuesday to better protect officers confronting motorists they have pulled over, said Capt. John Born, a patrol spokesman.

This moron's statement brings this question to mind:
How is a LEO in more danger from an individual who is legally carring a handgun than with someone who is carrying illegally?

The person with a CCW has been checked by the police for any criminal history and has attended the mandatory training. How does this make the person a threat to the police?

Statements like this only reinforces the anti-gun propaganda directed at the sheeple that anyone with a CCW is a homicidal maniac waiting to go on a rampage. They just need a trigger to set them off. It's gotta be true because a police Captain says so.
I wish one of the politicians backing CCW would have the guts to call this jerk in and tell him to prove his position or shut his lying mouth. I'm really tired of being defamed in this manner by political hacks.
 
It's awful hard to get gun control out of bill once they pass!
=======----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:37 AM
Subject: OH: Senate Passes Gun Control-Laden CCW Bill


> Senate Passes Gun Control-Laden CCW Bill
>
> Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
> 8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
> Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
> http://www.gunowners.org
>
> June 20, 2003
>
>
> Dear Ohio GOA supporter:
>
> For the second time in six months, the Ohio Senate has taken a bad
> concealed carry bill and made it much, much worse.
>
> Earlier this week, Ohio Senators (bent on appeasing the anti-gun
> demands of Gov. Bob Taft and numerous organizations opposed to your
> right to defend yourself with a concealed firearm) passed Amended
> Substitute House Bill 12.
>
> Previously, the Ohio House of Representatives passed H.B. 12 with
> restrictive provisions that would permit some Ohioans to get a CCW
> license and carry concealed in some locations. The bill was
> horrible even then. But the Ohio Senate added massive new
> restrictions that guarantee very few Ohioans will ever be able to
> carry concealed for self-defense.
>
> Some of the anti-gun provisions now in the bill include:
>
> * A total BAN on carrying in cars if children are passengers.
> This is outrageous -- what better reason to carry concealed than
> to defend the lives of your children?
>
> * Mandatory fingerprinting of permit holders -- as though they were
> convicted sex offenders.
>
> * Onerous training and testing requirements -- to include forcing
> you to "prove" yourself whenever you renew the permit.
>
> * A laundry list of No Safety Zones where carrying is banned --
> such as all government buildings, all colleges and
> universities, any establishment that serves alcohol (even if
> the permit holder isn't drinking), all churches and places of
> worship unless posted otherwise, any private building or parking
> lot that is posted by the owner, and all day care centers.
>
> * Felony penalties for failure to inform a law enforcement officer
> that you are carrying -- too bad if you happen to forget to do
> so under the stress of finding yourself at the scene of an
> accident.
>
> One of the few good things in the original House bill has also been
> stripped out of the Senate version. Originally, the bill had what
> is known as an Affirmative Defense clause. This meant that if a
> person were forced to use a gun in self-defense, he or she could be
> protected from anti-gun prosecutors. If the person could prove to
> the judge that he or she would have qualified for a CCW permit, that
> person couldn't be prosecuted for not having one at the time of the
> incident.
>
> H.B. 12 is so incredibly anti-gun at this point that several law
> enforcement organizations -- previously highly vocal opponents of
> CCW -- have now flip-flopped and are either neutral or outright
> supportive of the bill.
>
> That's right. Ohio CCW's most vocal opponents are now more than
> satisfied with the anti-gun nature of the bill.
>
> As a result, Governor Bob Taft has indicated he is willing to
> sign H.B. 12 into law.
>
> In short: the Ohio Senate has screwed gun owners big-time.
>
> GOA saw this coming and previously warned that the Senate was on a
> mission to pass a very dangerous gun control bill disguised as a
> so-called "shall issue" concealed carry bill. That is why GOA has
> instead promoted H.B. 113, Vermont-style Right to Carry legislation
> sponsored by State Representative Tom Brinkman (R-Cincinnati).
>
> Just this month, Alaska passed such a law, proving that gun owners
> should always ask for what they want, not settle for what the
> politicians say they can get.
>
> A "Vermont-style" concealed carry law in Ohio would restore to
> law-abiding gun owners more freedom to protect themselves and their
> families with a concealed firearm -- without all of the anti-gun
> provisions so prevalent in H.B 12.
>
> There is still a chance to derail H.B. 12's anti-gun freight train.
> Since the House and Senate versions of the bill are very different,
> a special conference committee will be appointed to iron out the
> differences between the two versions.
>
> Many Representatives are already steamed about the Senate trashing
> their bill in such a blatant manner. Here is our chance to use
> that indignation to fix or kill H.B. 12.
>
> It is very important for you to contact your State Representative
> IMMEDIATELY and tell him or her them to push the members of the
> conference committee to remove all the Senate gun control
> restrictions now in the bill.
>
> Here's exactly what you need to do:
>
> E-mail, call and fax your State Representative RIGHT NOW! An Ohio
> House roster and pre-written letter are included below for your
> convenience.
>
> If you do not know who your State Representative is, at
> http://www.house.state.oh.us/jsps/Representatives.jsp you can search
> using your zip code. All letters to State Representatives can be
> faxed to: 614-644-9494.
>
> Please take the requested action as soon as you finish reading this
> alert. The conference committee could send H.B. 12 to the floor
> for final passage as early as TODAY.
>
>
> ----- Pre-written message to your State Representative -----
>
> Dear Representative ______________________________:
>
> As your pro-gun constituent, I STRONGLY OPPOSE the Senate version of
> H.B. 12 and want you to push the members of its conference committee
> to remove all Senate-imposed CCW restrictions from it.
>
> Specifically, I want the conference committee to:
>
> * remove the ban on concealed carry in cars;
>
> * restore the affirmative defense provision found in the original
> House version;
>
> * remove the mandatory fingerprinting scheme;
>
> * remove the onerous penalty for not notifying a police officer
> when carrying concealed;
>
> * delete the laundry list of No Safety Zones where law-abiding
> permit holders are disarmed; and
>
> * remove the stringent requalification training mandate.
>
> If these gun control provisions are not removed from H.B. 12, I
> want the bill KILLED, as it is completely unacceptable as passed by
> the Senate.
>
> Therefore, should your efforts to pressure the committee not meet
> with success, I demand that you vote AGAINST final passage of
> H.B. 12.
>
> Gun Owners of America will report to me what you do.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> ___________________________________
>
> ___________________________________
>
> ___________________________________
>
>
>
> ************************
>
> Ohio House of Representatives Roster
>
> (If you do not know who your State Representative is, at
> http://www.house.state.oh.us/jsps/Representatives.jsp you can search
> using your zip code. All letters to State Representatives can be
> faxed to: 614-644-9494.)
>
> Dis Name Pty Phone (614 area) E-Mail
>
> 01 Blasdel R 466-8022 [email protected]
> 02 Peterson R 644-6711 [email protected]
> 03 Carmichael R 466-1474 [email protected]
> 04 Willamoski R 466-9624 [email protected]
> 05 Schaffer R 466-8100 [email protected]
> 06 Latta R 466-8104 [email protected]
> 07 Jerse D 466-8012 [email protected]
> 08 Mason D 466-5441 [email protected]
> 09 Woodard D 644-5079 [email protected]
> 10 Smith, S D 466-7954 [email protected]
> 11 Key D 466-1414 [email protected]
> 12 DeBose D 466-1408 [email protected]
> 13 Skindell D 446-5921 [email protected]
> 14 Miller, D D 466-3350 [email protected]
> 15 DePiero D 466-3485 [email protected]
> 16 Kilbane R 466-0961 [email protected]
> 17 Trakas R 644-6041 [email protected]
> 18 Patton, T R 466-4895 [email protected]
> 19 Flowers R 466-4847 [email protected]
> 20 McGregor R 644-6002 [email protected]
> 21 Reidelbach R 644-6030 [email protected]
> 22 Hughes R 466-2473 [email protected]
> 23 Wolpert R 466-9690 [email protected]
> 24 Smith, G R 644-6005 [email protected]
> 25 Stewart, D D 466-1896 [email protected]
> 26 Price D 466-8010 [email protected]
> 27 Beatty D 466-5343 [email protected]
> 28 Raussen R 466-8120 [email protected]
> 29 Clancy R 466-9091 [email protected]
> 30 Seitz R 466-8258 [email protected]
> 31 Driehaus D 466-5786 [email protected]
> 32 Barrett D 466-1645 [email protected]
> 33 Yates D 466-1308 [email protected]
> 34 Brinkman R 644-6886 [email protected]
> 35 Schneider R 644-6023 [email protected]
> 36 Setzer R 644-8051 [email protected]
> 37 Husted R 644-6008 [email protected]
> 38 White, J R 466-6504 [email protected]
> 39 Allen D 466-1607 [email protected]
> 40 Strahorn D 466-2960 [email protected]
> 41 Williams, B R 644-5085 [email protected]
> 42 Widowfield R 466-1177 [email protected]
> 43 Taylor, M R 466-1790 [email protected]
> 44 Sykes D 466-3100 [email protected]
> 45 Otterman D 644-6037 [email protected]
> 46 Olman R 466-1731 [email protected]
> 47 Ujvagi D 644-6017 [email protected]
> 48 Brown, E D 466-1401 [email protected]
> 49 Perry D 466-1418 [email protected]
> 50 Hagan, J R 466-9078 [email protected]
> 51 Oelslager R 752-2438 [email protected]
> 52 Cirelli D 466-8030 [email protected]
> 53 Webster R 644-5094 [email protected]
> 54 Jolivette R 644-6721 [email protected]
> 55 Cates R 466-8550 [email protected]
> 56 Kozuira D 466-5141 [email protected]
> 57 Martin R 644-5076 [email protected]
> 58 Walcher R 466-9628 [email protected]
> 59 Carano D 466-6107 [email protected]
> 60 Patton, S D 466-9435 [email protected]
> 61 Boccieri D 466-1464 [email protected]
> 62 Callender R 466-7251 [email protected]
> 63 Young R 644-6074 [email protected]
> 64 Sferra D 466-5358 [email protected]
> 65 Harwood D 466-3488 [email protected]
> 66 Schmidt R 466-8134 [email protected]
> 67 Raga R 644-6027 [email protected]
> 68 Chandler R 466-2004 [email protected]
> 69 Calvert R 466-8140 [email protected]
> 70 DeWine R 644-6020 [email protected]
> 71 Evans, D R 466-1482 [email protected]
> 72 Kearns R 466-2038 [email protected]
> 73 Hartnett D 466-5802 [email protected]
> 74 Buehrer R 644-5091 [email protected]
> 75 Hoops R 466-3760 [email protected]
> 76 Gilb R 466-3819 [email protected]
> 77 Faber R 466-6344 [email protected]
> 78 Seaver D 466-1507 [email protected]
> 79 Fessler R 466-8114 [email protected]
> 80 Redfern D 644-6011 [email protected]
> 81 Wagner R 466-1374 [email protected]
> 82 Reinhard R 644-6265 [email protected]
> 83 Core R 466-8147 [email protected]
> 84 Widner R 466-1470 [email protected]
> 85 Schlichter R 644-7928 [email protected]
> 86 Daniels R 466-3506 [email protected]
> 87 Evans, C R 466-1366 [email protected]
> 88 Niehaus R 644-6034 [email protected]
> 89 Book D 466-2124 [email protected]
> 90 Collier R 466-1431 [email protected]
> 91 Householder R 466-2500 [email protected]
> 92 Stewart, J R 466-2158 [email protected]
> 93 Hollister R 644-8728 [email protected]
> 94 Aslanides R 644-6014 [email protected]
> 95 Dominic D 466-3735 [email protected]
> 96 Wilson D 466-8035 [email protected]
> 97 Gibbs R 466-2994 [email protected]
> 98 Grendell R 644-5088 [email protected]
> 99 Distel D 466-1405 [email protected]
 
What are you going to have to do? Take your holster off before entering a car and place it on the dashboard before you drive off? and then when you get out, you'll have to get out, put your holster on..so much for concealed carry.

It amazes me how ignorant politicians are that none of this matters because someone who is going to use a concealed firearm against a state trooper isn't going to jump through hoops and put on a dog and pony show to get a license to carry a concealed firearm.
 
Don't ya get tired of these police chiefs, Highway Patrol brass and LEO lobbyists testifying to restrict our rights at every turn and funding anti-rights candidates and then having the gall to say, "Hey, I don't write the laws, I just enforce 'em."

Lying, statist pukes.

Rick
 
From www.ofcc.net

House Bill 12 has been rejected by the Ohio House after the Ohio Senate made numerous changes to gut the bill. Ohioans For Concealed Carry has learned that Senate President Doug White is refusing to appoint conferees from the Senate until the differences between the House version and Governor Taft are "resolved". Is it any surprise that the Highway Patrol has to be involved before this committee will be appointed? Isn't this the purpose of appointing a committee? Governor Taft and Senate President Doug White are now holding concealed carry legislation hostage. More to come soon.

Ohioans For Concealed Carry fails to understand how holding a conference committee over the head of Ohioans and the Ohio House is somehow morally superior to doing the right thing: holding the actual conference committee to work out the differences. This is nothing more than the Senate playing politics for Governor Bob Taft

Senate President Doug White said he told Rep. Robert Latta, chairman of the House Criminal Justice Committee, that he's satisfied Taft would sign the Senate's bill. So, there's no reason to form a committee until the House and Taft work out their differences, he said.

"In my opinion, I do not have the votes to override the governor's veto. So it would be useless for me to send conferees over to negotiate something that's going to have to go to a veto fight," said White, a Republican from Manchester.

Contrary to what the AP Article states, it would only take twenty votes to override a veto, not twenty-two.

Proving once again that the Ohio Highway Patrol is running Bob Taft like the true puppet he is, the AP story ended with this:

The patrol also had not heard from the House. "Once we're approached, we'll listen," Lt. Rick Fambro said.

We don't write the laws, we only enforce them, right Lt. Fambro?
Man, just WHAT is going on in Ohio? Just when I thought it couldn't get more ridiculous. And these are Republicans?! :cuss: :fire:
 
Guns in cars must be locked away if the car contains a child under age 18.
That's a sensible provision. Because after all, a carjacker would never attempt to take a car from a family with kids. :rolleyes:

-BP
 
Additionally, isn't the SAFEST place for the gun on the person of the permit-holder, with regard to child "safety"? :rolleyes:
 
WAGCEVP: Used your pre-written message and sent to my House Rep (who is Pro HB 12 BTW). Also called Governor's Office as well as my Senator's Office today. Additionally sent the following to all my elected critters (including Gov Taft):

"I ask for your support in passing a PROPER Ohio concealed carry bill into law and NOT the Ohio Senate's Amended Substitute HB12 of 18 June 2003.

As an Active Duty Member of the US Military, I have had the opportunity to reside in a number of other U.S. states as well as overseas assignments in Europe, Central America, and Asia. I have served under arms in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan. Frankly, I worry more for the safety of my family here in Ohio (due to its entirely inadequate, antiquated, and unconstitutional self-defense/concealed carry laws) than I have ever personally worried for my own safety in any of those combat zones.

Having been issued concealed carry licenses in a number of other states and having served for 26 years as a U.S. Army Ranger/Special Forces NCO & Weapons Instructor, I have a comparative frame of reference for the pros & cons of self-defense issues and concealed carry legislation. The current cat fight in Ohio over this issue is a sorry spectacle...

I have NEVER lived (until now) in a location where my fundamental right to defense of self and family has been abrogated to the degree caused by Ohio's poorly conceived (and unconstitutional) existing legislation, the refusal of the Ohio Supreme Court to strike that legislation down, and the attempts by the Governor and Ohio Senate to pass WORSE legislation (such as Amended Substitute HB12 on 18 June 2003).

Ohio would do well to look at Georgia's Concealed Carry Law. In effect for over a decade, that state's law provides that responsible law-abiding citizens are capable of being masters of their own destiny and are able to handle firearms/self-defense issues as responsibly as they handle life's other significant matters (voting, taxation, employment, obeying the law, home ownership, raising children, driving vehicles, etc.). That state enacted legislation providing that:

1. ALL Georgia citizens legally eligible to own firearms are allowed to carry loaded & concealed firearms anywhere about their person while in their home, place of business, or inside their vehicles and WITHOUT NEED FOR A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT. This covers the self-defense needs for about 96% of that state's law-abiding citizens and for the vast majority of the situations they find themselves in during the course of a normal day.

2. A statewide permit system was enacted for persons who desire to be armed at all times (with the usual prohibitions against carry inside government buildings, airports, schools, bars, etc.). A statistically normal 3-4% of the law-abiding population availed themselves of this procedure.

Contrary to the predictions of anti-gun lobbyists, the streets of Georgia have not become rivers of blood. The highways are not littered with the bodies of Georgia State Troopers. In fact, crimes of violence have dropped precipitously (as they have in many other Shall Issue states enacting similar legislation). LICENSED LAW ABIDING CITIZENS DON'T SHOOT POLICE OFFICERS. CRIMINALS SHOOT POLICE OFFICERS!

Revision of the Georgia Code also DECRIMINALIZED thousands of otherwise law-abiding Georgia citizens who had (at great legal risk) routinely chosen to ignore the old statutes by deciding that their right to defend self and family outweighed any possible penalties for illegal carry. This eliminated a huge case-load from the Georgia court system.

HB 12 as presented to the Senate was a perfectly reasonable piece of legislation that has been gutted by Senate amendments in a fence-sitting attempt to appease all sides without actually redressing current injustice to the rights of Ohio citizens. I suggest that you pass HB 12 as originally submitted by the Ohio House (without the idiotic amendments attached by the Senate).

The provisions for de-facto database collection on Ohio citizens, the required re-holstering/securing of weapons (in public no less!) while entering/exiting vehicles, and the concept that my child is legally less deserving than my spouse of my best efforts to defend her are lunacy at best and criminally negligent at worst. Can you imagine the potential damage awards in the first court case involving someone's child murdered because Ohio law forbade her licensed parent access to the only means of protecting her life?

My vote in upcoming Ohio elections will hinge on this single issue (irrespective of candidate party affiliation). As well, the voting members of my family and numerous Ohio neighbors and co-workers feel as I do.

A wise friend once pointed out that a worn path across planted grass was not indicative of the need for new fencing, "Keep Off the Grass" signs, pedestrian traffic pattern studies, or an increased landscaping budget. It was, rather, an indicator for emplacing a SIDEWALK where people tend to travel. Let's quit screwing around Ohio, and join the other 44+ states of the union in enacting a common sense Concealed Carry Statute. We need a clearly paved sidewalk before we get dragged down the garden path."

Let's hope for the best in The Peoples Republik of Ohio...
 
"1. ALL Georgia citizens legally eligible to own firearms are allowed to carry loaded & concealed firearms anywhere about their person while in their home, place of business, or inside their vehicles and WITHOUT NEED FOR A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT."



RE carrying in your car: with NO permit , firearm has to be in open view, in the glove compartment, or in the center concole ... Any where else must have a permit..... We tried to change that to where the car was an extension of your home so we could carry CW in car, but it didn't fly..... Best we could wa sin the center concole......... BTW , our state NRA was absolutely NO help.
They keep saying our CCW is "up to par". I'm STILL waiting on a response to the question - WHO's PAR? :cuss: :fire: :banghead: :what:
 
Pulled together from www.ofcc.net

LATEST: At least one news organization (the Ohio News Network) is reporting that HB12 "appears to be dead." Others seem to be suggesting that summer break will be used as a cool-down period, and that the matter will be readdressed when the General Assembly reconvenes.

Gov. Taft is allowing the Ohio State Highway Patrol bureaucracy to dictate his position, and is refusing to entertain any notion of a compromise, despite having received 98% of law enforcement demands. The Senate is deferring their legislative responsibilities for negotiation to the Governor. The House is standing against efforts to make existing law even worse for citizens who wish to defend themselves.

Representatives from Governor Taft's office and the Legislature ended talks aimed at reaching a compromise Wednesday. Lawmakers are scheduled to leave the Statehouse Thursday for the summer.

The House wants to allow people without permits who get charged with carrying a weapon to be able to try to convince a judge that the weapon was necessary because of a job or personal safety.

The State Highway Patrol opposes that provision.

Governor Taft says he won't sign a bill without that the patrol opposes.

Meetings also took place Tuesday between Taft's aides, Representative Jim Aslanides, a Coshocton Republican who sponsored the bill, and Senator Steve Austria, a Beavercreek Republican who carried the bill in the Senate.

House Speaker Larry Householder said he was disappointed the House was negotiating with Taft and not the Senate. When each chamber passes a different version of the same bill, a committee of lawmakers usually works out differences.

"The Senate has sort of given its authority for negotiation to the governor, and the governor will not budge, so we're kind of stuck right now," Householder said.

Ohioans For Concealed Carry believes strongly that a HB12 compromise deserves to be agreed upon by a House and Senate conference, and sent to the Governor's desk, even if that means risking a Taft veto. Senate President Doug White (614-466-8082) has said he will not send members to a conference committee unless Taft is brought on board with a compromise in advance.

The Ohio House leadership deserves your words of thanks for standing against efforts to force a bill that would render families defenseless, erase existing affirmative defense laws without true reform as a replacement, and increase the risk of negligent discharges.

Am. Sub. HB12 would not technically die until Dec. 31, 2004, when the 125th General Assembly ends. Whether or not it "dies" depends largely on your actions, as constituents and voters, in the next few weeks.

Following this episode is really making me sick to my stomach. I don't know how much longer I can follow this...might be better off ignoring it for a while, for my health and all. :barf: :fire:
 
Gov. Taft is allowing the Ohio State Highway Patrol bureaucracy to dictate his position...Governor Taft says he won't sign a bill without that the patrol opposes.

As Governor, Taft controls the OHP. How can he maintain, and why does the news media, allow such a fallacy?

Rick
Happily, formerly, of Ohio
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top