One day he is with NRA the next day Brady bunch...suuuuure

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
Gun control issue needs addressing

William Welliver
Co-News Editor

Until last week, my thoughts on gun control generally fell into line with those of the National Rifle Association - gun crimes aren't the result of too many guns, gun crimes are result of people.
That has changed. Within the last week and a half, two serious crimes involving guns were committed in my hometown of Lititz, Pa. The first occurred last Tuesday when a man who was being served for traffic violations refused to get out of his vehicle. The police broke the driver's side window and the man responded by firing several shots at the three officers, wounding one. The shooter, 23-year-old Daniel Faust, fled the scene of the shooting and remained at large for several hours.
Around 12 p.m., approximately 11 hours after the initial shooting, Faust was shot to death on a farm in rural, southern Lancaster County by a state police corporal and a federal marshal. Faust apparently drew his gun when confronted by the two officers and fired a shot before he was shot and killed.
At approximately 8 a.m. Sunday, Michael and Cathryn Borden were shot to death in their Warwick Township home. The alleged shooter, 18-year-old David Ludwig, then abducted their 14-year-old daughter, Kara. Authorities believe Ludwig committed the crime because the Bordens had reservations about Ludwig being involved with Kara romantically.
I used to blame gun crimes on the people that committed them. However, after these two incidents that hit extremely close to home, I have changed my tune. There are too many guns in this world and all too often, they end up in the hands of the wrong people. Who knows how the Borden abduction would have turned out if authorities weren't able to cause Ludwig to wreck his car.
When Michael Moore released his "Bowling for Columbine" documentary, gun control was still a rather important issue on the national level. Now, as shown during the 2004 presidential election, gun control is a minor issue.
It is time for the issue to be put back on the table. It truly boggles the mind that, in Pennsylvania, our government has spent more time complaining about their own salaries than working on serious issues. Property tax relief, Medicaid funding and gun control - all issues that the state government should at least attempt to address, and they sit and do nothing.
How many people have to lose their lives before we take this issue seriously again?

http://www.etownian.com/051117/opinion-gun_control_issue.asp
 
He fell off his meds.

How can he think that "gun crimes aren't the result of too many guns, gun crimes are result of people," one week and then "There are too many guns in this world and all too often, they end up in the hands of the wrong people," the next week and not realize that he is saying the same thing in both statements?

Somebody hit him with a cluebat, please.:rolleyes:
 
There are too many guns in this world and all too often, they end up in the hands of the wrong people.

Pandering to irrational fear is a tried and true leftist extremist technique. It worked for Lenin. It worked for Stalin. It worked for Hitler. It worked for Mussolini. It worked for Mao. It worked for Castro. It worked for Pol Pot. It will work again for...
 
Fly320s said:
Somebody hit him with a cluebat, please.:rolleyes:

Or just a BAT.

Seriously.......

Until last week, my thoughts on gun control generally fell into line with those of the National Rifle Association - gun crimes aren't the result of too many guns, gun crimes are result of people.
That has changed

This was a shameless ploy to grab the attention of more moderate shooters. He hoped that, by not immediately showing his true colors, he would get more folks to read his article; rather than starting out with the usual BS and turning away anyone that is not like-minded. Clever, but sneaky and a little trite. He never thought like an NRA member or gun owner, because our perceptions of reality do not change whimsically.
 
What gets me is that gun control proponents really do know that their
ideas are as worthless as bunny dung.


Why do these people devote their lives to disarming their fellow citizens?

I know there are truely uninformed ignorant folks out there that truely belive that less guns = less crime

But the brady bunch, VPC, and their ilk KNOW the score and take great pains to lie and propagandize to further their cause?

Is this the definition of evil?
 
pants flambe'

I like that. I don't have a clue what it means, but I like it. Send that cluebat my way, apparently I need it too.

I agree that Mr. Welliver is full of crapola, but some people do change their minds about gun control. For the last few years, the changes have mostly gone our way. Bill O'reilly changed his mind after Katrina and now appears very pro-gun.

I think for a lot of people, it's more about winning the argument than the merits of the argument itself.
 
You can't blame guns unless they go around commiting crimes all by themselves. Until then you have to blame the people.

This guy is either a lying bastard who always favored people control or he's a stupid moron who can't figure out the truth. Either way he now openly opposes my civil rights and is my enemy.
 
I sent an e mail to the editor politely suggesting Mr. Welliver need turn down his hearing aid so couldn't hear the evil guns whispering to him to pick them up and go kill someone. I further noted that it was a shame how many folks are trying to illogically transfer the responsibility of evil deeds from the human who committed the deed to the inanimate object (tool) that was used.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.