swampsniper
Member
One thing sure, they don't make TROLLS anywhere near as good, today, as they used to!
Where did that little Pissant go off to, anyway?
Where did that little Pissant go off to, anyway?
alpha63romeo said:Don't clean the barrel good. Because you can't. Good is an adjective (used to describe a noun), well is an adverb (used to describe a verb). What you want to do is clean (verb) it well. Then the barrel (noun) will be good and clean.
Don't mess with the mote in my eye, until you get that logjam out of yours!History Nut said:Although I too understood what was meant by "clean the barrel good", I have to disagree that the correction of the grammer was not in order. I do agree that it could have been done more diplomatically. As is obvious, I don't get high marks in grammer and spelling either. I do proofread each post before submitting it and it doesn't seem to "take the fun out of it" at all. I do try my best to get it right. We should all try to use the language correctly for a very good reason. Laxness in any area breeds sloppy habits in all areas. Some may think it "funny" to demand correct usage of the language but take seriously the loading of the wrong cartridge in a gun even though the two are connected. It pays great dividends to "get the details right" both in communication and the use of tools. Checking each cartridge for correctness before loading is no more trouble than proofreading before posting and a lot healthier. Personally I would rather have a bruised ego than a damaged eye.
Disdaining correctness in spelling and grammer is like walking into a gun shop and asking for some "45s". Okay, which "45"? Another all-too-common one is to ask for "30 caliber". Okay, what is the bore diameter so I can find something 30 times that size? It is important to know if you just put a 20 guage in your 12 guage for some strange reason.:banghead:
I have seen some posts that are so bad that it is almost a foreign language. I usually send them a private message in the most polite way that I am able to try to help and educate. Sometimes I have saved myself much embarrasement because it turned out the person with the bad grammer/spelling was 'English as a second language' or dislexic. As this is "The High Road" and quite public, grammer and spelling corrections should be done privately. However, it is also not the "High Road" to ridicule someone who, however impolitely, attempts to better our usage of the language. We are supposed to be grown-ups and able to take our criticisms besides hand them out.
swampsniper said:but, Diane Feinstein ain't one of MY senators!
Actually he got it right
You're = you are gonna hate it here.
swampsniper said:I was teaching a girl friend to cook, no way would I propose until she got the hang of boiling water, walked in one day, and she showed me the spaghetti she boiled, then, she said, "have a beer, relax, I'm starting to make the sauce"!
History Nut said:As this is "The High Road" and quite public, grammer and spelling corrections should be done privately. However, it is also not the "High Road" to ridicule someone who, however impolitely, attempts to better our usage of the language. We are supposed to be grown-ups and able to take our criticisms besides hand them out.
Black Majik said:oh yeah,
Welcome to THR alpha63romeo
1KPerDay said:Nice comma splice there, professor.
alpha63romeo said:This has been entertaining. Let me first address whomever it was that pointed out my comma splice: you are absolutely correct. I find myself less concerned with punctuation than with how something sounds when spoken though. Had I spoken the sentence there would be no comma/semicolon. I understand the difference; it was just an error on my part. When I say out loud: “clean the barrel good”, it seems to want to come out in the same voice I might use to jokingly say “I like them french fried potaters,” or, “boy, you got a purdy mouth.” I’ll assume that the unnecessary comma in “Nice comma splice there, professor” was meant to be funny. If you wanted a pause there I think an ellipses would have been more appropriate.
Let me then address the person who said:
“Whoa-oa-oa! I feel well, I knew that I would, now
I feel well, I knew that I would, now
So well, so well, I got you!
Just doesn't cut it for me. Now, as much as I am a stickler for correct spelling and grammar, if we can cut James Brown some slack surely we can do the same on this forum.”
Good is correct when referring to verbs of sensation. For instance: “The pie smells good” is correct. “Good” is describing the pie. To say “the pie smells well” would imply that the pie has a nose and is good at smelling. Likewise, you can say that you feel good, or smell good, or even taste good (if you enjoying licking yourself).
In all seriousness though, if I were interviewing someone for a job and they said, “I work good with others,” I would say, “Thanks, don’t call us… we won’t call you.”
As far as being labeled a troll… well, quite frankly I have no idea what that means. I’m not frightened by the discussion that my post has created. In fact, that was the entire purpose of the post: to create a discussion. I’ve simply been too busy to respond. I didn’t intend to offend anyone.
If anyone’s interested in my bits of wisdom, I’ll leave you with a few. 1- Watch your adjectives/adverbs. 2- Use whom if the pronoun is the object of the sentence, otherwise it’s who. 3- Don’t call something a “gun” unless you’re referring to a piece of artillery. And 4- If you missed something someone said, ask them “say again”; only use the word “repeat” if it’s immediately followed by “last fire mission.”
alpha63romeo said:By the way, I'm pretty sure a run-on sentence is a sentence where two or more complete sentences are joined with no punctuation. So, he was right; it was a comma splice.