azmjs
member
Up until relatively recently many people were severely oppressed by the government in this country.
IN the 50s, 60s, and 70s, people began to seriously resist this oppression, and they used mostly non-violent means to do so.
Would they have been morally justified under the Second Amendment and the founding principles of our nation in using guns to kill their oppressors and the agents of their oppressors?
Should civil rights marchers have shot policemen and Jim Crowe politicians, thereby watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants?
IN the 50s, 60s, and 70s, people began to seriously resist this oppression, and they used mostly non-violent means to do so.
Would they have been morally justified under the Second Amendment and the founding principles of our nation in using guns to kill their oppressors and the agents of their oppressors?
Should civil rights marchers have shot policemen and Jim Crowe politicians, thereby watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants?