Outfitting A Security Contractor Team

Status
Not open for further replies.

HMMurdock

Member
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
431
Location
Indiana, the home of John Dillinger
Alright, in brief, an associate of mine is trying to put together a private security contractor team to be marketed for security contracting in Iraq. The guys he has put together are fairly well versed in military and tactical law enforcement operations so let's try to stray away from anti-security contractor comments and stick to the topic at hand...

He has asked my personal imput on what they should be issued so I thought I'd bring it to you guys for comment. They have a handful of professional training instructors that have all stressed the need for all members of the team to be issued and trained the same weapons format. I assume this is for training simplicity? Training one guy on a GLOCK, another on a Sig and another on an Hk doesn't seem too practical. I assume the ability to split magazines in case of an emergency is also a factor, but I hear that is an overstated and unlikely scenario...?

I figure the best primary rifle format would be that of an M4/M16 since most with the military/SWAT background would be most familiar with that of the AR family as well as it's current prevalence with security contractors around the world. The AK-47 family is an obvious alternative because of their reliability and availability of ammunition and magazines in Iraq and across the globe.

The standard sidearm is a slightly more complicated issue if you ask me. The individuals I know on the team seem to generally prefer .45s, but from what I understand 9mm is the only combat caliber widely available across the planet. I would personally suggest the GLOCK 9mm family for the team because of the relatively cheap price of a Glock as compared to a Sig or Hk, along with the availability of full sized (G17 and G34) models and the compact (G19) models that so many prefer with their universal GLOCK magazine acceptance and the availibility of 34rd magazines. GLOCKs reliablity is outstanding in conditions such as the gritty environments of the middle east.

Other possabilities would be the Browning Hi-Power, Sig-Sauer 9mm family, Hk USPs, Springfield XD, Beretta 92s, etc.

What would you guys suggest and why? Anyone with contractor experience or military experience having been in close contact with contractors have any input on what is the most common? Any comments on caliber choice and availability? Anything else to consider on the firearm issuance front only?

TRL
 
"I assume this is for training simplicity?" Logistics, I'd say. Ammo supplies, spare parts, spare mags, etc.

I'd go with something in .45 (Glock, HK, SIG, 1911)... maybe something in 9x18 Makarov for backup.
 
Last edited:
Not a contractor, but knew someone while deployed here's my .02


M4s are used extensively as are AKs. Either or, Probably be more of a personal preference as well as what thier mission will be.

As for a side arm, take your pick, something reliable and everyone could use. I defintly would go with the same for everyone only for the interchangablity of mags when the poo hits the spinny thing. But again make sure it's something everyone can be comfortable with.

Other gear....A good vest system with a hydration puch and inserts for plates. Good boots. Reflex sites are good to have, but I went awhile with out one but loved it when I got one. weapons mounted light would be nice if they have to operate at night, BUT dont use it to replace having another one on your person. Lose your long arm and it gets dark fast.

Anywho I'm sure there are others here with lots more to say so ciao!
 
well you want to be able to take multiple 308 hits to the back....


sorry couldnt resist.
 
well you want to be able to take multiple 308 hits to the back....

It would be some 7.62 X 54R in the back, that's usually a little heavier loaded than most .308s but I don't know what they usually get in Iraq.

As far as firearms go, for the sake of all our reputations have someone on the team with some glass so you know at whom you're shooting. No more Tillmans or random civilians, please.
 
I work for a small company that does security contracting and personal protection and we have the option to use sig or HK. If you are active law enforcement you can use your duty weapon with proof of qualification using that weapon. It really depends on the situation, for instance my company will purchase and HK or SIG for work use only or reimburse on specific models for work/personal use. If your friend is purchasing the weapons for his team I would definitely stick to one manufacturer for a price cut and ease of repair, more so than anything though is the ammunition being used. If all of his employees use the same ammunition he can buy in bulk and save quite a bit of money. Other than that, its not really a big deal, even the great schools like blackwater will train private teams with different handgun configurations.

Don't know if that helps you or not, but I dont really know if you are asking from a business stand point or a training stand point.
 
I would definitly say an M4/16 for the rifle. If you want an Ak later on you could get them there for cheap.:D

I would also go with either the Beretta 92 or the Glock 19 as the sidearms. That way you would be able to get spare parts and mags through the US supply line (M9) or buy them from the Iraqi Police (G19).
 
browning hi power, next s&w 59 series, then cz75. those last two have about a zillion mags out there, plus the cz has been used by military and law inforcement for about 30 years all over central and E. europe.
 
also a good legknife, leatherman tool, and camelback, and gloves , and sunglasses, and boots and socks.... anything else?
 
I'd only accept a 9mm. handgun if they can get and use JHP ammo. If they're limited to ball ammo, get a .45 apiece, and don't argue. 9mm. ball is about as useless a "stopper" as anything I know.
 
I had an article written by one of the troops over in the Sandbox. I'll be darned if I can find it now. Basically, the M16 or flavors thereof is somewhat difficult to maintain. Most would prefer an AK variant as they are not as finicky as the M16s when it comes to dust and dirt. They liked the .308s better, too. The other complaint was that the 9MMs didn't tend to keep the bad guys down. Most would have liked having the 45ACP back. If I can find it, I'll post the email.
 
Before you go galavanting around buying stuff, be advised that some firms will "issue", ie, make you buy what they're equipping. No matter how your team works, you'll have to see if you can all get hired on. Some places to try are Blackwater, CSA, and KBR. Be advised, that even if all members of that team get hired, there's no guarantee that they'll be working together, as they may get split up to fill other slots.
 
What about HK 416's? They are being sold and delivered to LEO's, and its gas piston will eliminate reliability issues while maintaining M4/16 platform positives. See more here.

"This is the weapon we oughta go to war with right now."
rtsp://real.atpco.gannett.edgestreams.net/blackwater/2005/HK416002.rm

http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/blackwater/
 
Contractors can use hollow points. Gear is not important, whatever they decide on will be fine I'm sure. The biggest mistake these companies make, repeatedly, is they focus on gear/toys and TOTALLY DROP THE BALL ON LOGISTICS!!!

I know logistical support is "boring", but the saying that amatuers talk tactics and professionals talk logistics is true. Case in point, I got multiple armored vehicles, set up wrong (no upgraded suspension etc.) and NO maintenence plan for them! From day one I asked about maintenence and predicted the vehicles would go down soon. They did, big mess. He needs to think through how to supply and sustain his force, especially vehicles and maintenence. Gear is a one time purchase, too easy. Weapons can be had in country, anything they want. What about training, range access, ammo?

Companies like Diamondback Tactical have pre-made "operator kits" in different configurations with everything but weapon, mags and ammo. The company I worked for got something similar from Blackhawk.
 
I work for a private security company, I am not armed but we have an armed component to the company. All our armed officers must provide their own firearm from an approved list that list is essentially the same as you would see on any police departments. Most if not all of the armed guys are ex LEO's so its a natural fit. Also I dont know about your local laws but here in Oregon being an armed contractor sucks because you gain little if any legal protections but all of the restrictions and regulations, it deters a lot of people.
 
Let them know what local conditions are like and recommend a list of 9x19mm locked breech recoil operated pistols. But ultimately allow them to choose what they want to carry as long as it is 9x19mm. That will simply ammo issues and should increase the chances of availablility.

Also let them know that in order to take it with them they will have to pass a course of fire involving ______ rounds of ammo with the handgun intended by serial number. This should include some practice sessions under instruction, and together with an extended course of fire for record ought to weed out any unreliable pieces.

For issue pieces to those who can not or do not want to take their own I would recommend Browning High Powers or Glocks. Sure there are other good pistols, but most people who speak 1911 can speak BHP. Glocks are universal and a fair choice as long as any not familiar with them are thoroughly instructed and drilled. There are others that are not bad choices by any means, but these two are the best IMO.

In the case of long guns, I would try and get them in-country. Make sure two members going in are experienced M16-family armorers - with good tool kits, and a thorough pre-trip course on the AK family if they do not already have it. They should be able to screen any aquisitions over there and deal with problems that arise. If one gets sick or gets ready to come home he needs to be replaced rightaway.

Last and not least; be sure to weed out any drinkers and dopers. Either are a bigger liability than any faulty equipment. Someone who likes a bottle of beer or a glass of wine with a meal, or a Martini, Scotch etc in the evening on his offday is one thing - anyone who must have a six pack or must lay into a bottle is a potential problem IMO. Some very specific pre-employment screening questions need to asked in this regard with written records; with a written and signed understanding that if they materialize later as a problem they can consider themselves fired and sent home.

-----------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org
 
Our company had a "one ND and you are gone" policy as well. That was A-OK with me. Sent a couple home...

I used an AK over there. Ordered an Ultimak rail and put a reflex optic on it. Great weapon system at that point. An Aimpoint can mount low enough on an Ultimak rail to have the irons co-witnessed. I don't think any other reflex type sight will do that on an AK. The receiver cover rails suck IMO, no cheek weld at all, sight sits way too high. Same goes for AK side scope mounts.
 
Here is how I was told to purchase equipement for the people I supported in Iraq. This info is from a year ago and I don't know if things have changed. These guys were all ex-SF, SEAL, Ranger etc....

No desert camo, The military did not want the the contractors to be mistaken for military. Notice when you see a TV news person they are wearing blue or some other non-military color.

Western weapons no Russian stuff. Its like wearing gang colors, until I was able to get the team M-4s the team would be stopped at check points and often spent quality time with their face in the sand until they were cleared.

Open display of grenades, pistols etc was frowned on, so they wore loose fitting photo vests over the armor.

If you drive american vehicles you will be shot at more then if you buy foreign vehicles.

You cannot armor up a foreign vehicle as much as you can an american vehicle. Foreign built just doesn't have the frame and payload capacity.

You do not have the protection of US law over there, you are covered by Iraqi law.
 
I have a couple clients who provide these services in Iraq and elsewhere. As we have investigated providing services in other parts of the world, we have discovered that different countries have vastly different rules. You need to know where you will be providing services first and then find out what that country will allow. No sense buying a bunch of stuff if you can't bring it with you.
 
Ok, here's the email. Can't say just how valid it is. You know, opinions are like armpits, everybody has a couple and most of them stink.

This email is from a guy who is there...No politics here, just a Marine with a bird's eye view opinion:

1) *The M-16 rifle:* Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is more popular because it's lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also. They like the ability to mount the various optical gun sights and weapons lights on the Picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.

*Fun fact:* Random autopsies on dead insurgents show a high level of opiate use.

2) *The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon):* .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of crap. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly (that's fun in the middle of a firefight).

3) *The M9 Beretta 9mm:* Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the
9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the
9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

4) *Mossberg 12ga.* Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect.

5) *The M240 Machine Gun:* 7.62 NATO (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!). Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable and the 7.62 round puts' em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there.

6) *The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun:* Thumb's way, way up. "Ma deuce" is still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

7) *The .45 pistol:* Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it. The old government model 45's are being re-issued en masse.

Cool *The M-14:* Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.

9) *The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle:* Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers
( we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. Definitely here to stay.


10) *The M24 sniper rifle:* Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in 300 win mag. Heavily modified Remington 700's. Great performance. Snipers have been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcock's record for confirmed kills with OVER 100.

11) *The new body armor:* Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round. The bad news: Hot as crap to wear, almost unbearable in the summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for head shots whenever possible. All the bull**** about the "old" body armor making our guys vulnerable to the IEDs was a non-starter. The IED explosions are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in most cases.

12) *Night Vision and Infrared Equipment:* Thumbs way up. Spectacular performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very little enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. We've all seen the videos.

13) *Lights:* Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are Surefires, and the troops love 'em. Invaluable for night urban operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it. I cant help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old! With all our technology, it's the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants! The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

*Bad guy weapons:*

1) *Mostly AK47's*. The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly shoots like crap. Undisciplined "spray and pray" type fire. However, they are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. (Iran, again)

*Fun fact:* Captured enemies have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's just say they know better now.

2) *The RPG:* Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple, reliable and as common as dog****. The enemy responded to our up-armored Humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range. Still killing a lot of our guys.

3) *The IED:* The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury-rigged artillery shells. Al lot found in Jordan's area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3
155-mm artillery shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone, and the explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank. Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately, they are much more sophisticated "shape charges" (Iranian) specifically designed to penetrate armor. Fact: Most of the ready made IEDs are supplied by Iran, who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the insurgents in their use and tactics. That's why the attacks have been so deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We f ind about 40% before they detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.

4) *Mortars and rockets:* Very prevalent. The soviet era 122-mm rockets
(with an 18-km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordan's NCOs lost a leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage "inside the wire". Jordan's base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue
(It did). More of a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul a$$ in a matter of seconds.

5) *Bad guy technology:* Simple yet effective. Most communication is by cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops. They use handheld GPS units for navigation and "Googleearth" for overhead views of our positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare. They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.

*Who are the bad guys (remember that is what the Captain called them!)?*

Most of the carnage is caused by the Zarqawi Al Qaeda group. They operate mostly in Anbar province
(Fallujah and Ramadi). These are mostly "foreigners", non-Iraqi Sunni Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world (and Europe). Most enter Iraq through Syria (with, of course, the knowledge and complicity of the Syrian govt.), and then travel down the "rat line" which is the trail of towns along the Euphrates River that we've been hitting hard for the last few months. Some are virtually untrained young Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in "sacrifice squads". Most, however, are hard core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas). These are the guys running around murdering civilians en masse and cutting heads off. The Chechens (many of whom are Caucasian), are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters (they have been fighting the Russians for years). In the Baghdad area and south, mo st of the insurgents are Iranian inspired (and led) Iraqi Shiites. The Iranian Shiia have been very adept at infiltrating the Iraqi local govt.'s, the police forces and the Army. They have had a massive spy and agitator network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80s. Most of the Saddam loyalists were killed, captured or gave up long ago.

*Bad Guy Tactics:*

When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their asses kicked every time. Brave, but stupid. Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common earlier in the war and still occurs. They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing AKs and RPGs directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like grass every time (see the M2 and M240 above). Jordan's base was hit like this often. When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (Allah's Waiting Room). We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science. The fast movers, mostly Marine F-18s, are taking an ever increasing toll on the enemy. When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130 Sp ectre gunships cut them to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all.

*Fun fact:* The enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand. That is why we're seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber crap. The new strategy is simple: attrition. The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian non-combatants as cover. They know we do all we can to avoid civilian casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and
(especially) Mosques are locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons and ammo and flee to when engaged. They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for civilian casualties. They will terrorize locals and murder without hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans or the new Iraqi govt. Kidnapping of family members especially children) is common to influence people they are trying to influence but can't reach, such as local govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.). The first thing our guys are told is "don't get captured". The y know that if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. Zarqawi openly offers bounties for anyone who brings him a live American serviceman. This motivates the criminal element whom otherwise don't give a crap about the war. A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnapped by common criminals and sold to Zarqawi. As such, for our guys, every fight is to the death. Surrender is not an option.

The Iraqis are a mixed bag. Some fight well, others aren't worth a damn. Most do okay with American support. Finding leaders is hard, but they are getting better. It is widely viewed that Zarqawi's use of suicide bombers against the civilian population was a serious tactical mistake. Many Iraqis were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the police forces went up, along with their motivation. It also led to an exponential increase in good intel because the Iraqis are sick of the insurgent attacks against civilians. The Kurds are solidly pro-American and fearless fighters.
 
He has asked my personal imput on what they should be issued so I thought I'd bring it to you guys for comment. They have a handful of professional training instructors that have all stressed the need for all members of the team to be issued and trained the same weapons format. I assume this is for training simplicity? Training one guy on a GLOCK, another on a Sig and another on an Hk doesn't seem too practical. I assume the ability to split magazines in case of an emergency is also a factor, but I hear that is an overstated and unlikely scenario...?
Get them a common handgun - simpler to train on, simpler logistics for spares, yadda, yadda. Why complicate things unnecessarily?

I figure the best primary rifle format would be that of an M4/M16 since most with the military/SWAT background would be most familiar with that of the AR family as well as it's current prevalence with security contractors around the world. The AK-47 family is an obvious alternative because of their reliability and availability of ammunition and magazines in Iraq and across the globe.
Either/or - I used both but much preferred the AK for penetrating cars.

The standard sidearm is a slightly more complicated issue if you ask me. The individuals I know on the team seem to generally prefer .45s, but from what I understand 9mm is the only combat caliber widely available across the planet. I would personally suggest the GLOCK 9mm family for the team because of the relatively cheap price of a Glock as compared to a Sig or Hk, along with the availability of full sized (G17 and G34) models and the compact (G19) models that so many prefer with their universal GLOCK magazine acceptance and the availibility of 34rd magazines. GLOCKs reliablity is outstanding in conditions such as the gritty environments of the middle east.

Other possabilities would be the Browning Hi-Power, Sig-Sauer 9mm family, Hk USPs, Springfield XD, Beretta 92s, etc.
No, it's very simple - issue one pistol, period. I prefer .45s too, but carried a 9mm Hi-Power - and we went for 9mm specifically because it's easy to get ammo supplies. Personally, for the dusty conditions over there, I would have preferred a Glock - and I'm no Glock fan-boy, either.

What would you guys suggest and why? Anyone with contractor experience or military experience having been in close contact with contractors have any input on what is the most common? Any comments on caliber choice and availability? Anything else to consider on the firearm issuance front only?
If you're going to be doing a driving outside the wire as opposed to being just security Fobbits, you'll need decent machine-guns because you will eventually run into people inside vehicles that need stopping right the **** now. It takes longer to stop a suspected VBIED with a SAW than it does with a PKM or M2 - know what I mean?

You'll need to supply personal protective equipment such as body-armour and a helmet, of course - assault-vests are nice to give the guys as well but this is a whole other story on its own. Also lay in a supply of decent handgun holsters and some magazine pouches as the ones available there are complete cr*p.

Forget issuing boots, pants, knives and flashlight sort of stuff - unless you're really willing to be generous (which is always welcome, anyway) the lads should take their own, with khaki-coloured pants preferred in general. I'd also suggest supplying a few team golf-type shirts with the company logo to each guy.

Spare magazines - lots and lots and lots of spare magazines per handgun and rifle.

I have so much to say on this score, but I'm now tired. Feel free to PM if you prefer.

Andy
 
That email, FWIW, has been thoroughly dismissed as bunk.

Plenty of terminology errors and it's pretty obvious that whoever wrote the thing has an agenda to push.
 
MKS has your Teams Weapons Solution:p

40sw_carbine.jpg


48339.jpg


$300 per man, you can't get cheaper than that.

Seriously though I would stick with M16A2 M4, M14s, and M9 or their compatable civilan versions.
 
FWIW, when i was at a class at Blackwater (who is one of the larger security contract firms overseas) they were all about the Glock. inexpensive, effective, reliable, and not so many parts (logisitically: less parts to stock for repair). they were big on the 9mm's, probably because of another logistical reason (the US military uses 9mm so it is readily available, vs. some more exotic round like .357 SIG or something).

as many have pointed out, logistics is what you need to consider more than anything. all guns essentially do the same thing. logistically you need to have availability of replacement parts, interchangeability of parts (i.e. no "handfitted" parts, they should all be "drop-in"), and readily available magazines and ammunition.

several people have said the 9mm is a rather ineffective round. true, however, id rather have plenty of 9mm than having to scrounge the entire country for other calibers. an empty gun is a useless tool.
 
AR-10 or Springfield SOCOM 16 as a long arm. The .308 is a proven man stopper. People will complain that the ammo is heavier and that mags are more limited than AKs or a M-4/M-16s. The fact is that ammo weight is a mute point because they will spend most of their time either driving or riding. Spare ammo can be carried on the trucks. Given the choice between making 30 litte holes or 20 big ones, I'll take the twenty big ones. Ammo will not cost much more than 5.56mm. Also, if his employees want something for more close quarters situations, AKs are VERY readily available and so is ammo.

For a side arm I would go with either the Springfield XD 45 Service models. These weapons will fit almost anyone's hands. Recoil is very manageable, and accuracy is amazing. They have also proven to be as reliable as anything else on the market. If he wants something more common, go with Glocks or Sigs. Field reliabilty and performance should be about the same with all three firearms.

Next he needs to invest in armored vehicles and the best body armor and helmets he can afford. Also get some camel back hydration systems. Spare weapon parts (the ones most likely to break...springs, mag springs, anything that gets alot of wear and tear). Sunglasses, boots, uniforms of some type, flashbang grenades, signal flares, commo systems, MOLLE gear, Leatherman Wave multi tool, weapons cleaning and maintainence equipment, spotlights, weapon mounted lights, some type of optics for the weapons (EOTECH, Aimpoint, and ACOGs are all great for their respective missions), lots and lots of spare mags, ammo, batteries for everything, and toilet paper. LOL!!! Yep, toilet paper.

There is alot of other stuff involved. Getting started will probably be the hardest part of it all. Best of luck to him and just make sure he remembers to hire great people and treat them well. He will not be dissapointed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top