Outfitting A Security Contractor Team

Status
Not open for further replies.
AR-10's, SOCOM's, and XD-45's, huh?

You've apparently never been overseas. When somewhere like Afghanistan, or Iraq, the name of the game is logistical simplicity. Bringing in a weapon like an AR-10 or an XD, which needs propietary parts are going to be a lot harder to maintain than M4's/16's, AK's, Beretta, Glock, or Hi-Power pistols. There is a reason most contractors prefer those weapon systems. They can get parts, mags, ammo, and replacements very easy.

You lose a few XD mags in a vicious running gun-battle, and you're pretty screwed, unless you stocked up ahead of time. You lose some Hi-Power mags, and you buy some more locally.

When going to war, the KISS rule should be paramount in a planners mind.
 
Whatever your chosen weapons platform may be, be sure to train your guys in it (hopefully with the actual weapon they'll use, for confidence) before leaving if at all possible, zero your iron sights/optics as well.

Getting it when you get there is a little late when bad guys decide to come calling!

I believe the quote you are trying to remember is:

"Amateurs study tactics, proffessionals study logistics."
From "The Cardinal and the Kremlin" by Tom Clancy.
 
Have someone who knows their paperwork.

Keep them in the rear with the gear.

Good communications. After the crap hits the fan, you wanna get outta there.

Plenty of ammo. Don't worry about accuracy - just keep shooting and keep heads down.

Buy trucks (not new), and pay a good mechanic. Well.
 
I would also go with either the Beretta 92 or the Glock 19 as the sidearms. That way you would be able to get spare parts and mags through the US supply line (M9) or buy them from the Iraqi Police (G19).

If Iraqi police and Blackwater is using Glocks, I would go with a Glock 17 or 19. The US military may get stingy with replacememt parts, but Glock parts would be more of an open market thing. If the Democrats get their way you will see more troop reductions, and increases in security contractors. It would be good if you had dealings with other contractors and Iraqi Police.

Ohh and Hi-point is still waiting for your order ;)
 
couple thoughts.... my bro went over there recently for a stint as logistical contractor (no security duty/combat time, mainly in "safe" area) but having been over there previously in the army, he was given the option to carry which he did at all time.
being separate from the US armed forces, he went w/ the AK b/c of ammo availability. they had iraqi and fijian security forces who used primarily AK so he went with that in case he had to borrow ammo from them.

COMS, COMS, COMS!! i don't know much about them but my bro said he insisted on upgrading his groups communication system/communication security. don't know specifics, but you must be able to communicate effectively without giving info to enemy.

I'd make sure they have some good NV eqiupment.

Bro saw some sorry companies using regular pickups, etc. Ouch. Pay the $$ for the armored Humvees/trucks.

other thoughts: try to get as many arab speakers as possible. sure, interpreters are available but my bro took some arabic b/w his stints and it came in VERY handy.
 
OEF VET...duuuuhhh...why wouldn't you stock spare parts ahead of time. I guess the military just has parts fall out of the sky. Set your supply line up like the military does. Hire an armorer who knows his stuff. You can get any weapons parts you want over there. Be smart, choose the best weapon you can and don't make exceptions based on what is "readily" available. Don't count on being abe to get anything from the military...sometimes you can, sometimes you can't. With the right preparation you can use whatever weapons you want and have parts on hand to fix what breaks. And check your facts before you make comments OEF VET. I did my time in the sand box, and did it in Anbar Province, so I think I am quite qualified to put in my two cents worth.
 
marksman13,

I answered your questions in PM, but I'll post abbreviated answers here for everyone else to see, as well.

Name a PMC, besides Blackwater, that has a logistics support system anywhere near as complete as the U.S. Army. There aren't many. I assure you, some tiny company from Podunk, USA isn't going to match the Army's logistics.

Sure you stock ahead of time. If you have the money and the means to ship all of the stuff there. And how much is enough? What happens when Murphy strikes, and the amount you planned for wasn't enough? Are you going to run to the PX and buy XD mags? How many do you think Hadji has at the Hadji-mart in downtown Fallujah?

You mention getting stuff in via the mail, in your PM to me. Well, what happens when your last XD mag fails, and you're still waiting on your replacements to come in from the States? Or, your package is en route from BIAP to Al Anbar, and the Blackhawk carrying your mail takes an RPG round and crashes? Or, your box is coming in via a convoy, and the truck carrying your mail is hit with an IED, turning your XD mags into shrapnel? Are you going to go see PVT Joe Snuffy, at LSA Anaconda, and swap some hootch and girly-mags for a few spare XD mags? Probably not.

Murphy's Law is a mother. It will bite you in the backside at the very worst moment. You have to have a solid plan to counter Murphy. If your plan is to bring extra stuff with you, or to rely on the U.S. Mail, your plan is FAR, FAR from solid.

There are reasons why PMC's use common types of weapons like the M4, AK, Glock, Beretta, and Hi-Power. Amongst those reasons are things like the fact that most .mil types already know the systems, commonality of mags and weapons between team members, and ease of resupply.
 
A buddy of mine really likes his small GPS receiver. It lets him call back location (concern esp. if "off route" in a neighborhood and someone is coming out to link up/reinf).
 
AR-10 Shorty, Springfield Armory SOCOM M1A, or AK-47 Shorty as main-arm

HK USP Tactical or Springfield XD .45 ACP as side-arm

GLOCK .357SIG compact as backup
 
Duh_Bear,

Finally, a voice of reason.

Yeager's courses are top-notch, from everything I've heard (which includes a rundown on his recent alumni training day by one of my good friends, who attended it this past weekend). Yeager has actually been a PMC in Iraq, as have many of his instructors. Most of his instructors are either military, LEO, PMC, or a combination of the three.
 
AR-10 Shorty, Springfield Armory SOCOM M1A, or AK-47 Shorty as main-arm

HK USP Tactical or Springfield XD .45 ACP as side-arm

GLOCK .357SIG compact as backup
Once you get some real-life experience, perhaps you'll quit talking out your behind. Until then, let the men talk.

Yeager's courses are top-notch, from everything I've heard
I don't know anyone in Iraq who will touch him with a 10-foot pole, and no, I don't know the man and have no axe to grind - just reporting what I know.
 
Last edited:
They have a handful of professional training instructors that have all stressed the need for all members of the team to be issued and trained the same weapons format. I assume this is for training simplicity?

I would venture that it is for ease of logistical support. It would also allow you to buy in somewhat of a bulk buy and get some discount.

edit: lol, guess I should read all (or at least the very next post) prior to posting my reply.
 
quote:

Yeager has actually been a PMC in Iraq

yes, and in the video i saw of him, he was hiding behind a vehicle tire laying on the ground during an ambush. i think most of us have seen that video. in fact, a Marine Officer i know took a Tactical Response course and Yeager spent the first portion of the class defending himself from that infamous video of him, even though nobody even mentioned the video.

yes, Yeager has been a contractor in Iraq, but i don't know how much operational experience he got while he was there.
 
I have friends working over there for smaller companies.

After some casualties, shootings they completely dropped the "bullet magnets" (aka flashy SUVs) and switched to low profile, ragged looking, unarmored local vehicles with tinted windows (+w/ picture of Saddam or other preferred political figure on the windshield) to blend into the traffic. They feel much safer doing the route Irish this way.

Other than the DoD badge they like to wear casual clothing, minimal or no personal armor, and carry AK/AKMs (some dressed up with Ultimak stuff) and iraqi Beretta clones or BHPs. They found out the hard way that SMGs are useless, M4/M16s draw too much attention and require more maintenance...
 
Yeah, I've seen the video of the ambush. And, yes, I agree, Yeager dropped the ball on that one.

I should mention that I have never met the man, and don't have any bias towards him. In fact, I'm not entirely fond of him, based on my limited online interaction with him.

However, I have heard from several folks who have taken his class, and other classes, that his classes are well-run and informative.

I am also aware that he's more or less persona non grata in Iraq. That doesn't mean he can't run a good class, however. ("Those who can do, those who can't, teach."? Not to imply he can't do the job, but that if he can't be in-country, at least he's doing what can for the effort.)
 
Last edited:
OEF VET wrote:

Yeah, I've seen the video of the ambush. And, yes, I agree, Yeager dropped the ball on that one.

I should mention that I have never met the man, and don't have any bias towards him. In fact, I'm not entirely fond of him, based on my limited online interaction with him.

me neither. ive never had any interaction with him so really i can't say anything about him directly. i've only read the online stories.

However, I have heard from several folks who have taken his class, and other classes, that his classes are well-run and informative.

i know two guys who recently took a class from him and they really liked it. after they told me all the stuff Yeager taught them, i had two conclusions:

1. the classes he teaches really appeal to civilians who want to learn military-style "team drills." things like an Australian peel, etc.

2. while these have their place in the military, i have heard from many LEO's who have taken his class that most of his information is useless for LE work unless it breaks out into total mass chaos. the LE agency would have your badge if you were shooting that many rounds. also i dont really think there are alot of opportunities CONUS to use his training in real-world scenarios, but hey, the "overseas contractor thing" is the new hot thing in the tacticool world, so hey, if he can make a buck off of it, whynot?

alot of cops i know refuse to take his class. alot of civilians i know want to take his class. like him or not, his classes are almost always full.

alot of guys seem to like his classes because they shoot alot of rounds. one of my buddies said that because they shot 2000 rounds it was a good class. so i was like, ok, my sniper course was like 300 rounds, so it must have been terrible?:confused:

i had a friend who's an LEO here, who has taken many classes from Thunder Ranch, Pat Rogers, Triple Canopy, etc. he has taken about 10+ pistol classes from reputable training cadres. he asked Yeager if his prior classes would make him eligible for his advanced handgun class. Yeager told him no. evidently, Yeager's basic handgun class is so good it surpasses that of Thunder Ranch, Pat Rogers, Triple Canopy, etc. that is a pretty ballsy statement. i think putting yourself ahead of Clint Smith, Pat Rogers, and Paul Howe is pretty arrogant.

I am also aware that he's more or less persona non grata in Iraq. That doesn't mean he can't run a good class, however. ("Those who can do, those who can't, teach."? Not to imply he can't do the job, but that if he can't be in-country, at least he's doing what can for the effort.)

i know there are a few guys that talk a big game on internet but seem to have a very bad reputation in the private security/military/LE community. Yeager is one of them and his buddy Gabe Suarez is another. Gabe is a former Santa Monica (CA) PD officer who got busted for some sort of fraud and did jail time. personally if i wanted to build a name for myself i wouldn't be associating myself with either of these two persons.
 
As said over and over, logistics outwieghs everything for the indie contractor. Being able to find what I needed at Big Green & co. would be paramount in my decision making. Therefore M4/M16 would be your best bet. Your safest bet on logistics for pistols would be Berreta 92's; I dont think I'd even take a chance on Glocks, or Hi Powers. Im not farmiliar with the relationship military armorers and ind. contractors have; if armorers were allowed to repair ind. contractor weapons I would want to be absolutley certain that when/if the weapon goes down I can have a military trained armorer fix it or find what I need to get it running again. Military armorers may not be trained or may not have parts on hand to fix anything but American issued weapons.

Added: I liked what someone suggested about having a team member carry a rifle fitted with an optic. An M1A or accurized AR fitted with an optic would be a good idea, M1A parts & mags should be readily available at a base; not as abundant as M4/M16 parts & mags, but available.
 
I'm surprised that no one is advocating mauser 98s and nambu pistols or other relics and milsurp weapons. My hat goes off to the real players (the few of you) to the rest return to the bunker, with the warm feeling that you are doing your part. The pentagon will be posting next.
 
Good communications. After the crap hits the fan, you wanna get outta there.

commocx7.jpg


More accurate than you might imagine ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top