+P 9mm in Baby Eagle ok?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread Veer and “Expertiseâ€

twolf - -

This topic has strayed from Sir Galahad’s original question. He asked about use of +P ammo in his Baby Eagle. Your statements about legal problems with use of certain ammo have raised some questions in my mind. Please be advised that this is a request for clarification and NOT a personal attack.

Maybe you have some unusual laws in Campbell County, or in all of Virginia. Can you provide links to cites wherein private individuals are prohibited from use of Plus-P ammunition? Some Attorney General’s opinion that possession or use is prima facie evidence of intent to commit some crime? Perhaps you can furnish a couple of cases where evidence was taken in court pertaining to ammo-as-proof-of-an-evil-mind.

What you aver may well be true for where you live, but you present it as a global truth. I am familiar with the laws in Texas and a couple of other states regarding firearms use by legally armed private citizens.

I know of ONE agency in my area which issues Cor Bon ammunition. My own issues Gold Dot HPs. As a hobby shooter and firearms enthusiast as well as a career peace officer, I pay a lot of attention to arms and ammunition. As most drivers are more interested in basic transportation than in automotive perfection, most cops consider their side arms and ammo merely a part of their gear. They use their radios and computers but are not communications or cyber techs. They can use fire control gear but are by no means firefighters. They have basic first aid training but - - Well, you get the idea. They must demonstrate proficiency in the use of all these things, but are not necessarily experts in any particular field.

Perhaps you have credentials way beyond what you display. Do corrections officers in Virginia carry firearms? Our jailers are given only very basic firearms training and qualifications—Nothing like what the licensed peace officers get --- and most of the latter are far from authorities. Detentions personnel here are armed on duty only under extraordinary circumstances. I am friends with number of licensed jailers, so no disrespect is intended, but you mention your C.O. status as if this gives you standing in this ammo discussion, so I’m curious.

There have been many threads on the boards concerning firearms dealers’ “gun savvy.†Most FFL dealers have a basic knowledge of guns but are NOT ballistics experts. They stock what ammo sells and order what is requested. A dealer’s personal interest in firearms is apt to run to bench rest rifles, shotguns, cowboy action shooting, or varminting or deer hunting. They may read the “New Product Releases†on handgun ammo, maybe not. The dealers I know who carry pistols generally rely on a customer’s suggestions, or the salesmen’s samples.

Most BATFE guys who go to the shops are intent on inspecting records and seldom take time to discuss their preferences in ammo. These are (should be :D) busy people. It would make little difference—Federal Agents are more restricted in what they carry than the locals, and are generally uninterested in what you or I or the legal pistol packers prefer. The records compliance inspectors probably haven’t handled a machine gun or destructive device since they left training.

I am a certified Texas Concealed Handgun License Instructor, and we are required to attend regular refresher courses conducted by the state. The ONLY suggestions made to instructors concerning ammunition: The licensee who doesn’t practice often may be more proficient using .38s in their .357s. Students should be encouraged to test their intended carry ammo for function in their guns. Nothing, ZERO, against hollow point bullets or +P ammo.

If you can provide a statewide or regional survey of LE issue ammo, it would be interesting. It would NOT indicate a nationwide truism.

In my area, a private citizen defending self, family or home will not be “burned†for use of certain ammo. Was it a shooting justified by the circumstances?-- is what counts. While it is usually preferable to avoid shooting people, I think it interesting that (Texas) law has recently been clarified to state that there is NO DUTY TO RETREAT in case of a violent home invasion. A quite recent local case resulted in the householder slaying one robber and seriously wounding another. He was interviewed and a statement taken, but he was not arrested or charged. Local police and prosecutors figure the responsibility lies with the surviving robber. He is up for aggravated robbery, a first degree felony, and may well be charged with Homicide, a death resulting from his participation in a felony.

I eagerly await your replies concerning the legal references.

Best,
Johnny
 
Last edited:
who cares

Since you are a law enforcement officer, you can look the cases and laws up just as easy as I can. As far as my credentials, they do extend past my C/O experience but that is all I have to say on that subject. The bottom line is, you can believe me or not, I really care less either way.

As far as the ammunition goes, everyone can use whatever they want or like. If you think you are going to be defending against vampires, I would suggest +g (garlic) bullets. As I stated earlier and proved with statements from SAAMI, +p and +p+ increases velocity and expansion only. If you find me a man that can move faster than 1000 fps then I will change ammunition, otherwise their is not any way.

Fifty years ago concelaed carry permits were not needed in any state that I know of.

Twenty years ago, an assault rifle was selectable between semi automatic and full automatic. Now we have semi automatic assault rifles.

Ten years ago, anyone could buy magazines in excess of ten rounds.

Last year, a man defending himself and his young son would have not only have been justified in shooting the intruder but would have been praised for his courage. This individual has been indicted because he did not have a handgun permit, not a concealed handgun permit, a handgun permit.

We are closer to a firearm registry now than ever before.

By the way, there is an individual that is serving time in the system that shot an attacker which was justified but since it was a "hot" factory load, it went through the BG and hit another individual. He is serving 20 years for attempted murder.

"The beauty of the Second amendment is that no one will need until some tries to take it" Thomas Jefferson
 
Mr. Twolf, I myself am far from an expert, but I thought you might wish to know that the Jefferson quote above is at best unsubstantiated and possibly false. http://www.guncite.org

I would also like to repeat the earlier request that you provide some examples of cases in which the use of "hot" ammunition such as +P loadings resulted in convictions or heavier sentences than would otherwise have been the case. Honestly, when you say "ask any lawyer, he'll tell you this is true" most people assume that you are saying that you have actually asked some lawyers yourself and are in possession of the answer.
 
moderators everywhere

It is funny that the day after I submitted a complaint to this website about Al Thompson, a moderator, making derogatory comments about the men and women in law enforcement in my area, I am inundated by other moderators taking pot shots at me.

Everyone can use their own judgement, take a look at his whole statement. This is to the point of not only being counter productive, I just don't give a :cuss: anymore. This is the last post I will do on this topic. Let the moderators say whatever the :cuss: they want.
 
You may have the wrong impression - - -

- - - No one's taking pot shots at you. The Moderators are not ganging up on you. You made some pretty sweeping declarations, and questions have been asked. All participants on THR agree to discuss IDEAS, not personanlities; to attack ARGUMENTS, not the writers.

twolf, you say:
It is funny that the day after I submitted a complaint to this website about Al Thompson, a moderator, making derogatory comments about the men and women in law enforcement in my area, I am inundated by other moderators taking pot shots at me.
Just a minute, please - - - Are you referring to Al's remark about, "Great that your folks are all LE, but Lynchburg must have some crackerjack LE orgs."

Then you replied, 'And yes, we have great officers in this state. You calling them "crackerjacks" is an insult.'

Al came back, explaining: "Must be a regional thing. ‘Crackerjack' is considered a compliment down here. As in ‘Crackerjacks' - the candy." I'll second his explanation, as if it's necessary. He's a well-read, well-spoken, and erudite individual. "Crackerjack" is indeed a positive reference or descriptor - - Refers to person or persons of enthusiasm and proficiency, as in, "A cracker jack rifleman." If I worked in Rustburg city jail, the Campbell County Jail, Lynchburg PD, or in Virginia Prison System, I think I'd feel good if someone called my outfit a crackerjack organization.

I'm sorry, but I don't follow your line of thought regarding several things, including - - -

* * * "If you find me a man that can move faster than 1000 fps then I will change ammunition, otherwise their is not any way." Ohhhh- kaaayyy . . . . I didn't know there was a question of bullets needing to chase anybody. And, really, no one here is trying to change your ammo choice. They DO resist your declaration that there is some reason they should carry what YOU say: "I do not recommend anyone to carry +P or +P+ rounds unless you are a member of a police department or sheriffs department because you will be burned if you ever shoot someone."

* * * Carry permits, fifty years past vs. Now. ("Fifty years ago concelaed carry permits were not needed in any state that I know of." You might want to research this a bit. Think of Chicago, NYC, Boston, and Los Angeles.)

* * * Assault rifles, twenty years past vs. Now.

* * * Magazine capacity ten years past vs. Now.

* * * "Last year, a man defending himself and his young son would have not only have been justified in shooting the intruder but would have been praised for his courage. This individual has been indicted because he did not have a handgun permit, not a concealed handgun permit, a handgun permit." That's the NYC deal you mentioned earlier, right? Again, awaiting a cite or link to a news story.

* * * "By the way, there is an individual that is serving time in the system that shot an attacker which was justified but since it was a "hot" factory load, it went through the BG and hit another individual. He is serving 20 years for attempted murder." Where? When? May we please have a link or cite? Is he doing the twenty for a hot load or for negligence, or . . .?

Friend, we'll discuss this stuff with you, but could we please have some answers to our questions? How about a little structure to what you say? Please feel free to reply by e-mail or PM if you feel more comfortable in that mode.

Best regards,
Johnny
 
Since you are a law enforcement officer, you can look the cases and laws up just as easy as I can.

Well, I'm trying to, but I can't find any cases or case law pertaining to trial and conviction of non-LEO person(s) for using +P or +P+ ammunition in a shooting instead of regular-pressure ammo.

You've stirred my curiosity, and I'd really like to take a long look at the cases and case law you allude to. Since I can't find it, would you kindly provide some information? A case name, if nothing else, would be helpful.

Thanks in advance.

LawDog
 
twolf

What happened was, your post set off some of our B.S. detectors, and you got called on it. I could be wrong, but I haven't read anything in your subsequent posts to suggest that my B.S. detector needs to be re-calibrated. I don't have a problem with your opinions, except when you try to pass them off as facts.
 
Sir, speaking only for myself, I was not aware that you'd made any complaint at all. If I had been, though, I'd have posted the same thing. It's not hard to tell the difference between a personal attack and a question about what you posted. The difference is that with a question, you can make it go away simply by posting the answer. If you post the answers to my questions, then you have refuted my arguments and we're done with those questions.

You're on The High Road. No one is out to get you. I simply don't agree that juries punish people for using +P ammunition in otherwise justified shootings. Some other moderators disagree with other statements. Frankly, you should be prepared to defend your arguments against much more vigorous criticism than you've encountered here if you're going to post things that run counter to the experience of most people. Personally, I recognize that I lack practical experience in a lot of areas, which is why, if I found myself at odds with Johnny or Ian on a matter involving law enforcement, I'd go do some research before I continued the argument.

A few other statements that tripped my meter:

1. A year ago, a father wouldn't have been sent to jail for shooting an intruder.
Huh? I assume you're talking about Ron Dixon in New York, right? Well, last year, that part of New York had exactly the same laws and, I believe, the same prosecutors, not to mention the same public sentiment. So what is it that you believe would have stopped such an incident last year?

2. We're closer to a gun registry than we've ever been.
Nationally? No, we're not. We're not where we want to be, politically, but we're close to it. Between Columbine and the election of 2000 it looked like Gore would be elected and would pursue the matter with Congress.
 
Now this is TOO weird!!! One of my other threads somehow merged into this one! In another thread I started on the legal & political forum, I asked the question about legalities regarding ammo selection. Ths was due to some locals here spreading a rumor that if you don't use what the cops use, you'll go to jail after a self defense shooting. Several folks pointed out what utter BS that is AND backed it up with SOURCES. Now, Twolf (If you are still persuing this thread), you were asked to back up your claims. You did not. So, without evidence, you are 100% wrong here, sir. By the way, where did the moderators attack you??? No, what happened is someone called you on your BS and you found any port in a storm to hide from backing up your unfounded hearsay. I truly feel sorry for anyone who you advise on self-defense. Your "advice" just may well get some poor soul killed. I hope YOU can live with that, sir. My uncle is also a state trooper but that doesn't make me an expert on LEOS. As far as you being a corrections officer, I am not impressed. In some states now, COs are private guards hired by Wack-a-Nut Wackenhut with barely a few hours of training and barely paid above minimum wage. A few have already been killed because of that fact. I'm smelling eau de mallninja here...

On another note, I ran some 124 grain Gold Dot +P Gold Dot 9 mils through my Baby Eagle the other day and they were perfect! At my longest household distance of 14 feet, 10 rounds into a group the size of a quarter! Happy! Happy! I couldn't tell much difference recoil wise, but the Baby Eagle is a heavy pistol, all-steel (weighs almost 2 pounds unloaded!) and attribute it to that. I recently got hold of some brand-new factory high-caps for this pistol and am a happy man indeed. Thanks all who replied!
 
Now I don't want to get caught up in all this. But I would like to say that I don't buy the "you will get burned by the jury using +p ammo".
Now as a new person to guns and knowing very little about ammo, I feel that I would have a similar knowledge as the jury would about ammo.
The first thing I would think about a user of +P ammo is that he wanted to use the best ammo he could get the protect his home, not that he wants to kill. But this is only MY opinion.
 
I'm not a LEO

Not a trainer

Not even a mall ninja

But I do work with a few lawyers (corporate types) as a side product of my job. (None of them shoot)

I asked them that if they were to push a wrongful death suit would they play the "killer ammo" card. I named a few brands that the LEO's use. Six out of six said "no." When I asked why, I got one "would different ammo make the bad guy any less dead" four "same ammo the police use would stand up in court" one "if it is sold to the area public as self defense ammo what else would it be used for"? When first asked all six looked at me like I was crazy and had to do a lot of explaining and even show this thread to get any answer but all agreed that in a shooting if the laws of self defense for the area are followed that type of factory SD ammo should not matter.

One did say that hand loads could be a case point in a trial

.02 I found, to be taken with salt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top