i was kinda happy about the way Newsom, the notoriously lame SF mayor is handling it.
he refused to lower the flag to half mast.
now before you supporters of the war get all upset, hear him, and me out-
(first off , i support the deposing of Saddam, whatever the method)
OK= so Newsom's logic was he could NOT bow to protestors demading the flag be lowered for our lost soldiers just because they want him to.
there are specific guidelines for flag lowering, and this would have opened the door to almost any group wishing the flag be lowered.
Now= besides these legal reasons, that i agree with, the govt flag is for govt officials, local heroes, national events.
IF they lowered the Flag for the protestors, in a way, it would be as if the Govt of SF joined the protest, and they did not.
i barely understand the logic of us not going to Iraw in the first place, i totally dont understand the logic of pullnig out now.
***************
my favorite, somewhat tough to dispute argument, especially in the face of a hard anti war person=
Should we NOt have fought the civil war??
at the time of the civil war it took 3 weeks to march to the south, poor folks form the city fought a rich man's war essentially over manufacturing/labor/tariff disputes, in the name of a greater cause, freeing slaves.
sure, Iraq is far away, but when people are oppressed like that, it IS our business, and Iraq , with oil, has the potential to recover, unlike many other oppresive states. further, it was weak enough we actually could go in and do something. (in response to the "why don't we go to China" argument, obviously it would cost too many lives to help anything.
Not to mention WWII which is already a historical Shame for the way we watched the jews (among others) get taken away for years, only doing something whne we were finally attacked, and it started making huge economic sense to go to war.
and Again, the poor fought, while most of the rich stayed home.
So Be it. i have a particular unfondness for the extremely wealthy, but at the same time i recognize that without money, factories, etc, we could not defend such large groups of people , wars unfortunately must be fought.
every $300 paid by a rich guy to stay out of the civil war= rifles and bullets to kill slave owners (HA!)
so when people tell me we shouldn't be in Iraq, i ask them well should we not have gone to the south either???
in today's world , Iraq is way closer then Georgia was to NY.
how anyone can tell themself they should allow mass graves and other tyrannies of Saddam continue, on OUR dollar (whether we by the oil he sold off for palaces etc directly or not, we all affect the price).
sure it's ok to drive your car, buy Saddam guns, let him kill whoever.
but pay to get him out of there???
i am so thankful for all these brave soldiers wh ogo out there because they know they are protecting the future for all of us.
HA! i just wish Clinton had had the nerve, the US people had the nerve back then when we actually had the $$$ to blast Saddam.
we had enough reason then, but Clinton actually bowed to the will of the people and pulled back.
Dubya and comany saw too much Profit to resist. i know those punks only go to Iraq for the $$ reason. i have no fear at all Iraq posed any threat to the US as a nation.
BUT Saddam had to go, really. he was a turd, scamming his oil for food, oppressing his people, a ruthless murderer bent on total domination of anyone under him.
i Do believe he would ultimately have attacked Israel, another reason to get him out of there.