bushmaster1313
Member
There are those who maintain that requiring a photo I.D. to vote is unconstitutional because it has a disparate impact on the voting franchise of minorities, who are asserted to be less likely to have a photo I.D.
Curiously (I am being polite) many of those pushing the voting franchise issue are also pushing to require a photo I.D. to purchase ammunition, and it is already a Federal statute that you must show a photo I.D. to purchase a firearm from an FFL.
Has anyone pointed out to guns & ammo photo I.D. folks that if the pundits are right about the voting issue, the photo I.D. requirements for guns and ammo will necessarily have a disparate impact on minorities seeking to exercise their franchise under the 2nd Amendment?
Curiously (I am being polite) many of those pushing the voting franchise issue are also pushing to require a photo I.D. to purchase ammunition, and it is already a Federal statute that you must show a photo I.D. to purchase a firearm from an FFL.
Has anyone pointed out to guns & ammo photo I.D. folks that if the pundits are right about the voting issue, the photo I.D. requirements for guns and ammo will necessarily have a disparate impact on minorities seeking to exercise their franchise under the 2nd Amendment?
Last edited: