neoncowboy
Member
Maybe you've seen/heard Martha Zoller, conservative radio talk show host from North Georgia. She's a regular on Hannity and has her own show on WDUN 550AM in Gainesville, Ga. http://www.marthazoller.com
Today, she read my email on the air and then spoke flatteringly of what a great analogy I'd made.
================ my email ======================
Hi, I am a regular listener and caller to Martha's radio show. I know that she is a supporter of the 2nd Amendment (or, says she is anyway) and thought I'd suggest this topic:
I got angry the other evening watching some 'voter rights activist' on the TV news.
She was condemning GA's law requiring a photo ID to vote and explained that voting is a most basic constitutional right and that it is wrong to place any obstacle in front of it. She was indignant.
Then I remembered how...
I must have a state issued permit to carry my handgun. That permit costs $15 and I have to spend another $23 on a background check/fingerprinting to get it. This requires me to have picture ID and go, in person, to the magistrate court during business hours and to the sheriff's office during restricted hours for the fingerprints. If I have ever been convicted of a crime, no permit. That constitutionally protected right is gone. I wait for about 4 months and my permit to exercise my constitutionally protected right comes in the mail...even though the law specifies I must receive it in 90 days.
Can you imagine the uproar if we restricted voting to people who had no criminal record? Charged $40 for a voting permit? Made people wait 90 days for one?
Why is it acceptable that this many layers of obstruction be placed between me and my 2nd Amendment rights, but a picture ID being required to vote is 'unconstitutional'.
And why is a court willing to place a restraining order on GA's ID-to-vote law, but not on it's concealed carry law?
I am not a 'gun nut'. I'm not a violent revolutionary, building an arsenal or any of the weird characterizations the mainstream media likes to use when describing gun owners. I am simply a freedom loving American who recognizes that the right to keep and bear arms is the most fundamental of all of our civil rights.
I am dismayed that we accept laws requiring permission from the government to exercise our fundamental rights. It is time for a change.
I'd love for you to tie these 2 issues together on the air some morning.
Thanks,
John Corry
North Hall, GA
Today, she read my email on the air and then spoke flatteringly of what a great analogy I'd made.
================ my email ======================
Hi, I am a regular listener and caller to Martha's radio show. I know that she is a supporter of the 2nd Amendment (or, says she is anyway) and thought I'd suggest this topic:
I got angry the other evening watching some 'voter rights activist' on the TV news.
She was condemning GA's law requiring a photo ID to vote and explained that voting is a most basic constitutional right and that it is wrong to place any obstacle in front of it. She was indignant.
Then I remembered how...
I must have a state issued permit to carry my handgun. That permit costs $15 and I have to spend another $23 on a background check/fingerprinting to get it. This requires me to have picture ID and go, in person, to the magistrate court during business hours and to the sheriff's office during restricted hours for the fingerprints. If I have ever been convicted of a crime, no permit. That constitutionally protected right is gone. I wait for about 4 months and my permit to exercise my constitutionally protected right comes in the mail...even though the law specifies I must receive it in 90 days.
Can you imagine the uproar if we restricted voting to people who had no criminal record? Charged $40 for a voting permit? Made people wait 90 days for one?
Why is it acceptable that this many layers of obstruction be placed between me and my 2nd Amendment rights, but a picture ID being required to vote is 'unconstitutional'.
And why is a court willing to place a restraining order on GA's ID-to-vote law, but not on it's concealed carry law?
I am not a 'gun nut'. I'm not a violent revolutionary, building an arsenal or any of the weird characterizations the mainstream media likes to use when describing gun owners. I am simply a freedom loving American who recognizes that the right to keep and bear arms is the most fundamental of all of our civil rights.
I am dismayed that we accept laws requiring permission from the government to exercise our fundamental rights. It is time for a change.
I'd love for you to tie these 2 issues together on the air some morning.
Thanks,
John Corry
North Hall, GA