Physics of Pin Shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Coffeeguy

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
22
I’m not going to get into what is the ‘best’ load or bullet weight for bowling pin shooting, just a simple examination of the physics involved. Of course, the basic object of most pin shoots is to knock the pins off of the table in the shortest time possible…For most of us, that would mean one shot, one pin. It seems pretty simple, until you actually try it, as any rookie can attest. Bear with me as this isn’t pure textbook physics, nor are the terms used all scientifically correct, but the math is what’s important.

The basic deciding factor is the force of the bullet striking a bowling pin weighing approximately 3 pounds. It must transfer sufficient force to the pin to accelerate it and move it clear of the table. So, most shooters tend to consider the muzzle energy of the bullet, defined as ME = (m x v2) / K, where:

ME = muzzle energy in ft/lbs
m = bullet weight in grains
v = muzzle velocity in feet per second
K = constant based on acceleration and converting grains to pounds: (1 ft/lb divided by (32.163 ft.sec2 x7000) or, simplified, 450,435.

So, a 230-grain bullet traveling at 800 fps gives us:

(230 x 800 x 800) / 450435, or 326.8 ft/lbs of energy.

As many pin shooters can attest, .45 ACP is almost always perfect for the job. However, thinking in terms of muzzle energy, we know that even the small-by-comparison 9mm parabellum seems better. For example, where the above loading in .45 ACP yields 326.8 ft/lbs, a 115-grain bullet traveling at 1200 fps give us:

(115 x 1200 x 1200) / 450435 or 367.6 ft/lbs of muzzle energy.

Of course, the rookie decides the 9mm is obviously the way to go! Until he sees that a lot of times, the 9mm only knocks the pins over, instead of flinging them clear of the table as the ‘numbers’ indicate they should. Why?!?!?

Instead of bullets, let’s look at…What else? Bowling balls!

The average pro bowling ball weighs 16 pounds. The length of the bowling lane, from the foul line to the head pin, is 60 feet. On average, in pro bowling, the ball takes about two seconds to travel that 60 feet, and sends the pins flying…for the head pin, it gets knocked about 36 inches backward, good enough for any pin shoot, right? Well, the surprise comes when we crunch the numbers:

16 lbs x 7000 grains/lb = 112,000
60 ft / 2 sec = 30 ft/sec

So, plugging those numbers into the above equation gives us:

(112000 x 30 x 30) / 450435 = 223 ft/lbs of ‘muzzle energy’… Less than what the .45 ACP gives us. So how in the quack can it take out 10 bowling pins so decisively, with not nearly as much ‘muzzle energy’?

First, for muzzle energy to be a factor, we assume that ALL of the bullet’s energy is transferred to the target. If the bullet glances of the rounded surface of the pin, that won’t happen. The bullet would have to strike the pin perfectly straight on, which is a difficult accomplishment (especially when shooting 5 pins in 3 seconds or less!)

You can have a 110-grain bullet in a .357 magnum loading scream along at 1600 FPS, which would give you 625 ft/lbs of muzzle energy, eclipsing the .45 ACP, but it would probably punch right through the bowling pin, thereby not transferring all that energy to the pin.

Then, you have some plain weird stuff happen…It’s not uncommon to find slugs laying close to the pin tables, or have slugs ricochet back toward the firing line. Remember, at the bowling alley, the bowling ball has LESS ‘muzzle energy’ than most bullets at a pin shoot, and I’ve never seen the ball ricochet back towards the bowler. The bullet shouldn’t do it either, but it happens! The simple fact is that on paper, we can make things look very neat but in the real world, it’s not so simple.

So the REAL answer as to ‘why’ lies in momentum, not muzzle energy. We’re going to look at the bowling ball again. Where muzzle energy had a more complicated formula, momentum is simply a measure of the force applied to an object to move it and, as a result, the force that object transfers to its target. Instead of (m x v2) / K, momentum can be expressed simply as
m x v, where:

m = weight of the bullet in pounds, and
v = muzzle velocity in feet per second.

With the weight in grains instead of pounds, we merely divide by 7000, changing the expression to
((m x v) / 7000).

And, taking the above examples and calculating for momentum in pound-feet per second instead of muzzle energy in foot-pounds, we get:

Projectile Grain wt. velocity momentum
.45 ACP 230 800 26.3
Bowling ball 112000 30 480
357 Mag 110 1600 25.1
9mm 115 1200 19.7

Holy Discrepancy, Batman!!! No, that's not a typo. Not only can we finally see WHY the 9mm does not perform as well as the .45 ACP during pin shoots, but why a bowling ball can really fling the pins around even though it doesn’t have much ‘muzzle energy’!
 
Once you have been hit in the boot heel by a 255 grain .45 Colt bullet bouncing back off a railroad tie back-stop at probably no more the 200-250 FPS?

You will have more a complete understanding of momentum of those big heavy slow bullets!!

The darn thing nearly knocked my leg out from under me and dumped me on my butt in the dirt!!

Muzzle energy is the last thing in the world to be concerned with at big-bore handgun velocities.


rc
 
I shot pins for a few years and watched lots of guys struggle to get the pins completely off of the table with 9mms or .357s. If you can make a perfectly centered hit a 9mm will usually get the job done but it does not allow for ANY slop factor. I also saw .38 Spl. and 9mmbullets bounce off of pins without ever even penetrating the tough nylon jacket on the pins - it would just make a black mark. The nylon jacket and the hard rock maple used to make bowling pins is TOUGH - many times you would see pins with a .45 bullet that only went halfway into the wood. The best setup I used was a 625 revolver loaded with 255 gr. SWCs. A solid hit would blow pins off the table and 4 feet behind it. Of course it took more work to run that load at speed. I also worked at a range where we held "2X4" matches. You had a 2X4 held vertically with the flat side facing you and you had to stitch a line across the board and break it in half. A few people showed up with 9mm Glocks and would fire 6 or 7 full magazines at the board and never break it in half. The look on their face was priceless. Using a .45 you could stitch a line through the board and essentially "perforate" it and then place one round into the top of the board and lever it off and break it like a cracker. We discovered fairly quickly that a .45 SWC would punch a .45 hole going in and tear a huge chunk of wood out of the back when it exited. We called them "semi wood cutters".
 
Last edited:
I think that bullet placement is the biggest factor, in that you have to hit the pin center mass in order to transfer the energy into it and backwards off the table. A hit to the side of the pin knocks it sideways and hitting it too high causes it to lay over instead of flying off the table.
 
That is absolutely correct. I used the bottom of the neck as an aiming point. A hit there would usually make the pin do a back flip straight off the rear of the table without disturbing the other pins. Accuracy, power and speed were all required to win.
 
Short version: You have to know when momentum is relevant and when kinetic energy is relevant. Since you're trying to push over the entire body in pin shooting, momentum is relevant, and KE is not.
 
Spent a long dull winter a few years back working on this Pin thing. Made a bracket that suspended a pin along its center of gravity, about where the "shoulders" are widest. A threaded rod through that point on a pair of shallow "v" blocks was my test vehicle.
What I found, after hundreds of rounds fired and dozens of pins destroyed, is the following:
If you hit a pin with anything from a 115 9mm on up, sitting on the "back spots" (12" in from the rear of the table), in an area 2" above or below and 1"to either side of the center of gravity/mass or whatever you want to call it, it will go off.
If you hit it higher it will fall backwards and might not go off. Lower, bottom kicks back and you're looking at a small round head.
Either side it generally falls the other way and you might have a "spinner" to take care of.
Bigger calibers do much the same but you get a little more rearward motion.
Semi wadcutters help bite into the newer plastic coated pins.
I've been hit in the chest with two 40 cal bouncebacks in the dead of winter (we don't shoot after Oct. any more).
We also shot .22s using only the heads.
My favorite was a 1911 with RCBS 45 255KT over about 5.5 Unique. Anything close to the center was a dead pin.
For minor class, a M39 with 147 truncated cones over 4.4 Unique.
Revolver, same as the 1911 only a 625 smith.
Liked to shoot my 686+ against the autos.
Bottom line.....hit the center of the white part with anything decent and it will move back. Miss the center area and it won't. Simple.
 
As some have mentioned, shot placement is critical. But I think energy transfer is not nearly as important as momentum transfer. The comparison of momentums, normalized to the .45 ACP bullet is:

.45 ACP....... 1.0
9mm........... 0.75
Bowling ball. 18.26


And if the pin is fairly close to the table edge, an off center-of-mass shot is probably better than a direct center-of-mass shot. A shot directly on center of mass must have enough momentum transfer to overcome the sliding friction of the pin on the table and move it far enough for the entire mass to clear the table. An off-center shot will translate some of (hopefully ALL of) the linear momentum of the bullet into a moment of inertia on the pin, which causes it to rotate backward. If the center of mass just starts to go over the edge, the pin is going to fall off.
 
Been a long time, but as I recall, 9mm events didn't require the pin to be off the table. Just knocked over. At Second Chance anyway.
"....45 ACP is almost always perfect..." 10mm did a pretty good job too. Shot a few pins with an absolute stock Colt Delta Elite and Norma ammo(nothing else available at the time. No other pistols either.), long ago. Both provided by a very decent Colt Rep at a shoot. Pins went off the table with no fuss. Pistol and ammo were a tick excessive with recoil. More about recovery time than recoil with the stock pistol. Even the Colt guy mentioned that it wasn't in the same league as gussied up pin guns. Not bad though.
Kind of suspect a .40 S&W or even a .41AE would do ok.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top