Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Picatinny rail... just wondering...

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Corner Pocket, Feb 1, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Corner Pocket

    Corner Pocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    The land of the Alamo!
    This may sound pretty wacky, but on the way back from the range today, a thought hit me. I wonder if anyone shooting one of these new "teflon guns" has ever hung some weight on the picatinny rail to experiment with lessening the recoil? Would the gun's "balance" go completely nuts by doing so? :eek: Heck, I think I'll try rigging up something like that to try on my Ruger P345 the next time I go shoot, just for kicks... Would this be something worthwhile? Whaddya think? :D

    Corner Pocket
     
  2. Anonymous Coward

    Anonymous Coward Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Illinois, not Chicago
    Would a flashlight be heavy enough?
     
  3. RobertFBurnett

    RobertFBurnett Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    415
    I just wonder who Mr./Mrs. Picatinny was, and what tac-light laser combo there was available in 1913? Or was it for scopes? And 1913, I wonder if its like the American system of year it entered service?

    My guess would be the extra ballast could help recoil, but like you said could hurt balance and shot placement?
     
  4. 1911 guy

    1911 guy Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,380
    Location:
    Garrettsville, Oh.
    Mil-Std 1913, a numerical designation for standardization, has nothing to do with year of developement. Picatinny, named for the Picatinny Arsenal where it was developed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page