Picking my first Lever Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

civilian75

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Messages
111
Location
Hillsboro, OR
Never cared for a lever action rifle until the other day I fired my friend's. He is a FFL/SOT and does a lot of funky stuff, like, SBRing his SS 44Mag Marlin (~11-12” bbl) and attach a 45 can (11/4/09 correction: it is a Rossi M92, not a Marlin). I fired a handful of 240gr XTP-HP. Dang! :what: That thing was suppressed-22lr-bolt quiet! He wasn’t finished with it (no optics or sights) so I could not assess how accurate the rig is. Nevertheless, I am a believer now. I want a lever in my collection, and I want it suppressed, too.

Guys, I need help with selecting my first lever action rifle:

This is what I have in mind and why:
1. want a big bore rifle. I have narrowed it down to 44Mag or 45LC.
2. want a rifle that can stabilize at least a 250gr bullet (preferably a 300gr) at transonic and subsonic speeds and still be pretty darn accurate.
3. want also to shoot hot loads as well as subsonic loads.
4. will reload
5. Although I do not discard hunting, I am a plinker. But I like variety. I already have several 22 and 30 caliber guns (bolts and auto loaders). I want now something with a big bore and a mild rainbow trajectory :p that will still have a lot of energy at 100-150yds. I know that sounds like a .45-70 but I’d rather stick to calibers that will be easier to load subsonic.
6. I will probably buy two identical rifles:
a. one I will keep original,
b. the other I will cut both the barrel to 16”, (or maybe less if I feel like paying the tax stamp) and threading it to attach a 45 can.
c. But, if I can help it, I will try to make it just one, a sort of like a “transformer”. I am not moved by single shot platforms (i.e. T/C), just in case.
7. I may or may not get a revolver to match, probably a Blackhawk, so I can shoot the hot loads if I want. But most likely it will be cowboy loads. I am over 50 and foresee will soon start preferring the milder loads/calibers.

So, here are the questions:
1. 44mag or 45LC? I lean towards 45colt because:
a. I think I can load almost as hot as 44Mag if not as much (could be wrong so set me straight). Also, rifles come with a faster twist rate in 45 colt which will definitely favor my subsonic loads.
b. 45 Colt levers come with a 1:16 twist rate vs. 1:38 of the 44mags. My calculations show me a 240gr is barely stable in transonic speeds on a 1:38 twist. So a subsonic 300gr is out of the question in 44Mag
c. For accuracy, barely stable is not good enough, I think.
2. What rifle? Rossi, Marlin, Winchester, others? I lean heavily towards a 1894,
a. since I spotted a beautiful, like new, checkered stock octagonal 45 colt 1894 at a local shop for $465. Been drooling since. That’s when I realized I might have to buy two, because I’d hate to cut that bbl down. Is $465 a good price for a like-new rifle? Yes, it has the safety block, but that’s what dummy bolts are for.
b. Can install optics easily (my aging eyes will be grateful).
3. How hard is it to swap barrels on a 1894? I am thinking about buying round bbl at Numrich for the cut barrel job. But then, I wonder what will happen to all the other parts that were fitted to an octagonal bbl.
4. Need a shorter mag, too. Cut? Replace? Am I better off getting a half mag, and a half mag spring? Where?
5. If possible, I will try to stick to having just one rifle, one I can convert back and forth, even if it takes a couple of hours to do, without risking permanent damage to any of its parts by repeating the procedure several times.

I can take all the advice you can dish out.

I am pretty handy. Have rebuilt several AKs down to bending my own flats, and have done several gunsmithing jobs to my other toys. That’s to give you an idea of what my skills are.

Darn! that was a long post!!
 
Last edited:
I know that sounds like a .45-70 but I’d rather stick to calibers that will be easier to load subsonic.

With just a quick look in one of my manuals there were 3 loads that would be subsonic. One had a starting load MV of 700 fps. You may want to give the 45-70 a better look cause it would seem, at least to me, it would be a better choice to do want you want. But I'm biased, I love the 45-70.
 
Puma/Rossi 1892. I hear these have strong actions for your hot loads. Or like your friend, get a Marlin. But I would get the Rossi because its different than your friends, it doesn't always hurt to be a little different.
 
.45-70?

Wow! Three responses already. Thank you guys. I know it is long post but I wished you try to read it. I have several questions I'd love to hear your thoughs about them. I'm ultra low in my lever action learning curve. Advise in several areas requested is very much welcome.

[
With just a quick look in one of my manuals there were 3 loads that would be subsonic. One had a starting load MV of 700 fps. You may want to give the 45-70 a better look cause it would seem, at least to me, it would be a better choice to do want you want. But I'm biased, I love the 45-70.

Did not surprise me the first response was going to be around the .45-70. I seems to have a big following. You made me look again, and that is good. But the .45-70 has a very large case to fill. I suspect it will be very hard to find an accurate subsonic load, if at all possible. At least the twist rate on a 1895 is 1:20, not bad for slow 300-350gr slugs. Will run the numbers...
 
Last edited:
Second the Puma 92 clone. I'd suggest .44 Magnum. It's got a bigger rim that aids in feeding and extraction for lever actions. I've had some real problems with .45 Colt leverguns. I also much prefer handloading the .44 because the brass seems to be stouter and the loads easier to develop. But YRMV.

I lean heavily towards a 1894,

Why? The 1894 was designed for intermediate length cartridges such as the .30-30. The action cycles more slowly and literally disassembles itself every time. The bottom has to fall out to fit the round. It's a great, reliable action for its intended purpose but it was never supposed to be a pistol caliber carbine. That's what the '92 does. The action is quicker and more reliable with short cartridges.

But the .45-70 has a very large case to fill. I suspect it will be very ghard to find an accurate subsonic load, if at all possible.

There's a great new powder called "Trail boss" that fills big cases like that well without the need for filler. I've been using it for .44 mag loads and it's great stuff. And of course you can use good old real black powder with a heavy bullet and be nicely subsonic. The .45-70 will take you to an entirely different type of levergun, of course. The modernized Marlin 1895 is very popular around these parts. It is beefier and heavier than a '92 carbine.
 
Last edited:
.45 Magnum.?
Cosmoline, did you mean 44 Magnum?
Why? The 1894 was designed for intermediate length cartridges such as the .30-30.
Good input. This is the kind of things I need to hear.

Thanks for bringing the Puma back into my radar screen. The Puma was my original choice until I read some horror stories and the splitting forends. I need to hear positive feedback from other Puma owners. How is the Puma in the original and OEM parts market (barrels, magazines, etc) department? If only I could get a 44Mag replacement barrel for the 92 with a 1:20 or faster twist...

The problem I have with all .44mag levers is the twist rate: 1:38; very slow for subsonic. :( Otherwise, that would have been the route I'd take. IMHO, 240gr stabilizes enough as to avoid a baffle strike on my friends rig. Accuracy is still questionable. I am considering waiting until he finishes it and put it to the test. Don't think anything longer than a 240gr will be safe to shoot subsonic, though.

There's a great new powder called "Trail boss" that fills big cases like that well without the need for filler.
Trailboss is already part of my arsenal. Finding accurate loads with it has been hit-n-miss, though. I think twist rates had a lot to do with the accuracy issues I've had, though. Also tried SR 4759 and IMR 4198 (cycles the bolt on a AK47). But Trailboss has given me the best results so far.

I agree a .45-70 is a totally different ball game. One might be in my future but no now, and not for subs. I agree, if I already owned a .45-70, and wanted to explore subsonic loads, Trailboss would be my choice.
 
Yeah I meant .44 mag. The .45 Mag is the Casull which is another option but not really subsonic ;-)

The Puma furniture is not the greatest, but the actions are sound. There's also problems with drifting mag tubes under recoil which they fixed for the .454 but not for the .44 at least not that I've heard of. Basically it's a good one to get if you're going to tweak it anyway and maybe cut the mag tube down or dovetail in something to lock it in place. You'd never want to hack a real 92 for obvious reasons.

There's a fellow called Nate who specializes in slicking up and fancifying the Puma:

*warning his website shoots at you
http://www.stevesgunz.com/
 
Why? The 1894 was designed for intermediate length cartridges such as the .30-30.

The 1894 Winchester was designed for .30-30. The 1894 Marlin, as in the OP, was designed for pistol calibers.
 
.45 Colt baby! Less pressure and more versatile than .44 mag. Plus, if you get any other gun in .454 Casull (rifle or handgun), you only have one bullet type and die set to deal with.
 
XTP-HP at low velocity? Does it expand? (I doubt it.)

So what is it that you're wanting to poach, anyway?
 
+1 on the Marlin in .45 Colt and what extraction issue? I have put hundreds of rounds through the Marlin and hundreds through 5 revolvers in .45 Colt without a single extraction issue. The .45 Colt is an extremely versatile round running the gamut from mild to wild. If you're interested in reading about the top-end potential of the .45 Colt take a look at John Linebaugh's website HERE.

Pair the Marlin with a stout revolver in .45 Colt and you have a formidable set of tools at your disposal. I shoot the same loads using 200gr (Trail Boss), 250gr and 300gr (H110) through the Marlin and a bunch of revolvers. Once you use the Marlin to send a 300gr bullet downrange with 20 to 24 grains of H110 pushing it along, you'll be hooked. I have a S&W 629 but I'd swap it for another revolver in .45 Colt in a heartbeat.

:)
 
Last edited:
It's got a little dinky rim and if the claw doesn't grab it well enough you've got problems. Not to mention the potential for slipping under the cartridge carrier. Plus the brass is often thin walled and collapses when reloading--a problem I've never had with the stout .44 Mags. From my experience with it, the .45 Colt is overrated. Heresy, I know, but it's an early, poor design that ought to have been left in the moribund heap. There are dozens of similar cartridges that get the job done better that were unfortunately forgotten instead.
 
Cosmoline said:
From my experience with it, the .45 Colt is overrated. Heresy, I know, but it's an early, poor design that ought to have been left in the moribund heap.

Heresy ... YES!! I hereby sentence you to being burned at the stake ... your timing couldn't be better with Guy Fawks night just two days away!!

:fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire:

:)
 
It's got a little dinky rim and if the claw doesn't grab it well enough you've got problems. Not to mention the potential for slipping under the cartridge carrier. Plus the brass is often thin walled and collapses when reloading--a problem I've never had with the stout .44 Mags.

All very true. There's no real downside to the .44 Magnum and I'd definitely choose it over the .45 Colt, especially for use in a rifle. Start gathering the firewood.
 
Heh! Modern 45 Colt brass is just fine. You can get the same velocities with the same weight bullets with less pressure from the 45 Colt as you can with the 44 Magnum.

PR787LV, my first posting in this thread would have been about buying a new wallet as the old one would have caught fire from the speed at which it would have left my back pocket upon finding a new Marlin 1894 Cowboy in 45 Colt for $495. That's $200 less than what I've been seeing them for.

Of the two calibers, I'd choose the 45 Colt. It's versatile, accurate can be loaded to modern pressures in modern weapons and has more class than the 44 Magnum.

Seriously, can you imagine yourself holding your 44 Magnum saying "Ya feel lucky punk?" or the 45 Colt and "Fill yer hands ya sons of bitches!"

Ok, so the latter is better suited to the 44 WCF as they didn't chamber rifles for the 45 Colt back in the day.

Both are great calibers and wil serve you well. With the right bullets, the edge goes to the 45 Colt for hunting
 
PR787LV, my first posting in this thread would have been about buying a new wallet as the old one would have caught fire from the speed at which it would have left my back pocket upon finding a new Marlin 1894 Cowboy in 45 Colt for $495.
err.. I said $465:uhoh: It is "used" but looked like new. I am pretty sure by the time I go back for it, it'll be gone. The story of my life. :'(

Any input on how easy is it to replace the barrel? Especiallized tools or skills required? Keep in mind I am a do-it-yourself-er. To me that is a large part of the fun.
 
To the untrained eye (mine), 44Mag and 45LC looked pretty similar. I lean towards 45LC because of twist rate (1:16) and I noticed so mnay more bullet types and mfg to chose from.
XTP-HP at low velocity? Does it expand? (I doubt it.)
So what is it that you're wanting to poach, anyway?
Couldn't help yourself, could you? :)
 
Seriously, though, I don't think XTP-HP will perform well at low velocities, but I could be wrong.

I lean towards 45LC because of twist rate (1:16) and I noticed so mnay more bullet types and mfg to chose from.

You'll probably settle on a limited number of loads. .44 is not poorly supported, and it is a better round, especially considering the real availability non-exotic brass and standard production handguns.

However, you're right about the twist rate in the lever guns. If you want subsonic performance, you have to count on using some heavy bullets to get it. That pretty much takes the .44 out of the running if you want a stock gun. I don't know why they don't do, say, 1:20" or something.

But then again, you don't want a stock gun. You'll have it 'smithed anyway, so maybe a different barrel isn't a big price difference, either.

And I still wonder what you're going to be poaching. That sounds like a pretty classic poacher's gun right there. You don't need such huge bullets for paper-punching, bowling pins, or home defense.
 
$465 used. I need new reading glasses. Still, at that price I'd need a new wallet. Don't rebarrel it. See if you can find just a Marlin action and work with that. Have you been to the Lever Guns website? Lots of fellers there that might be able to help you out. Portland eh? You're just down the road from me. Where'd you say you found that Marlin? :)
 
It would be a shame to butcher a Marlin Cowboy. Not that many were made. Lots of plain-jane Marlin '94's out there to make into a project gun.

I picked up a LNIB used one in .44 Mag not long ago at a GM for $200 OTD, and it was a pre c.'83 model without the saftey!

It varies, but most XTP's will expand down to 800 fps. Some don't. Some go lower. Take a look at the chart shown in the pdf posted here:

http://www.hornady.com/media/2009_catalog/19-22_bullets_handgun.pdf
 
I've been having lots of fun with the .450 Marlin. It can certainly be loaded subsonic, but it also delivers a whole lot of whoopa'
 
I know absolutely nothing about reloading, that being said the next lever action I plan on getting is the Rossi 454 Casull. I belive it will shoot the 45LC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top