Pistol-Packin' Liberals

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/22/30441.shtml


Pistol-Packin' Liberals

Tom Marsland
Thursday, May 22, 2003

Liberals have it tough. Many liberals smoke, but hate big tobacco; drink, but belong to M.A.D.D.; vote, but want the courts to overturn elections; drive their automobiles, even to protests against internal combustion engines; are patients of tremendous doctors, in a health-care system they say is broken; enjoy virtually every aspect of freedom, while denouncing its guarantor, our military.
As if it weren’t tough enough living in the world of contradictions necessitated by liberalism, ‘conceal-carry’ reform comes along and throws a real wrench into their thinking. Will they, too, want to arm themselves while still somehow decrying the existence of firearms?

That was answered for me this past week when I attended the daylong basic handgun-training course put on by Minneapolis-based Plus P Technology (www.plusp.com). I was amazed at the liberal background of several of my fellow attendees, liberals who want to exercise their right to self-defense too.

Left-leaning Minnesota has just drifted right, becoming the 35th state to allow the Second Amendment to function closer to its original intent. Minne-soviet, as we’ve affectionately come to call her, has just passed the ‘conceal-carry’ reform legislation I just referred to, legislation that guarantees the right of law-abiding citizens to arm themselves against the ongoing threat of harm from our non-law-abiding citizenry. Folks who have always been well armed, and unfortunately they are legion.

Remarkable, I thought, as our new governor, a friend of mine named Tim Pawlenty, signed this legislation into law. The only caveat I was suffering under was the questionable provision that made this libertine guarantee available to 'all the people.'

When I, your humble correspondent, asked my fellow basic handgun course attendees "How many of you consider yourselves to be liberal?" I thought none, maybe one or two, would respond in the affirmative. But NOOOO … fully one-third of Plus P Technology students raised their hands. Plus P's director of training, Mike Wolbrink, said this was a "normal" class.

Now in this jaded age, I’ve come to think of normal as a setting on a Maytag dishwasher. Further, I thought raising your hand in a handgun class and admitting you’re a liberal was like Daniel wearing a Purina Lion Chow T-shirt when entering the lion’s den.

Back to the ‘all the people’ provision in the new law. That is not a very liberal concept, as you may be aware, and we from the Land of 10,000 Taxes get properly nervous when straying off liberal holy ground into uncharted constitutional waters.

But whoever it was that said liberals aren’t 'straight shooters' (thought you'd like that double entendre) ought to apologize to a gaggle of tree-hugging, crystal-gazing, incense-sniffing, "Kumbaya"-singing, 'PC' lefties from the People's Republic of Minnesota!

Ah heck, while you’re at it, throw in a big old group hug for them (just make sure it’s adequately diverse and multicultural).

Though liberals in Minnesota can compete with the best that Berkeley has to offer, I am still a little stunned. At some point they'll surely have to deal with the hypocrisy demonstrated by supporting the anti-gun politics of the late Sen. Paul Wellstone, may God rest his soul, and now celebrating (liberals like to 'celebrate' stuff) one’s right to have and bear a firearm.

Believe it or not, this is very provocative in our beloved socialist utopia, and it may indeed be taking things just a bit too far. Before you know it, we may have to relent, allowing such nonsensical freedoms as religion, speech, the press, peaceful assembly and petition.

Perhaps even ownership of private property, presumption of innocence for the accused, protection from unreasonable search and seizure, freedom from self-incrimination, a speedy and impartial trial by a jury of your peers, and even representation by counsel.

You see how this could get out of control?

Now why would I, a dyed-in-the-wool member of the vast right-wing conspiracy, make such a call for this kind of unabashed outpouring of conservative affection for our estranged pistol-packin' liberal brethren?

I am congratulating them on discovering the Second Amendment, a heretofore rarely exercised libertine principle, originally guaranteed them in 1792 and held in trust for them by conservatives until 2003. Now please, allow me to say on behalf of all conservatives: "Welcome to the good ship U.S. Constitution!"
 
Liberals do not "hate guns." They hate you and me. The "huckleberries" (their name for those of us outside Boston, NYC and DC) need to be controlled and commanded.

They surround themselves with guns and own and carry them. From Oprah to Rosie to the media, they all have guns. They do not want us to have them as well.
 
The Liberals would be the happiest if they were all armed, but you and I are not.:barf:
This of course would mean the Liberals and the BGs would have all the arms, and since we were not armed, the BGs would leave them alone and only go after us. :fire:
The Liberals would also be in better control also. We can't fight back without weapons, no more than the Jews were able to.
 
If you want to really understand liberals...

...read Thomas Sowell's "The Vision of the Anointed".

The thesis is that the liberals are the wiser, philosopher kings who lead the rest of us "the benighted" toward aperfect society by protecting us from the consequences of our actions and ensuring that we can only exercise freedoms in a way that will contribute to their vision of utopia.

This view of liberals explains almost all of their kooky ideas and their shameless hypocrisy.
 
:D
feinstein.jpg


............ :fire:
 
Malone,
It isn't enough for nitwits to think of their political opponents as merely wrong, they must also be evil. Why else do you think we see the constant references to "they want to enslave/kill us?" It isn't nearly exciting enough for it to be mere political differences when we can spin it up into Gotterdammerung. "They" are the enemy. "They" want to destroy our whole way of life. "They" want to kill us. "We" aren't merely right, "we" are all that is good and holy. "We" are the heirs to the infallible Founding Fathers. "We" are the ones who really care about the children. For the record, neither right nor left is suffering a shortage of nitwits at present.
 
Not evil, but....

I don't think anyone in this thread has said that liberals/leftists/socialists are evil. We've just said that some of them either hate conservative/libertarians or that they hold us in contempt as uneducated rubes from the hinterlands.

That said, I can understand how one could grow to hate people who would force their opinions about what kinds of cars to drive, what kinds of toilets to use, and what kinds of guns to own on us at gunpoint.
 
"It's not Balrog, it's MICRO Balrog...'

Geez, use a term of familiarity, and the Balrog bites your head off...

Or, since he's a Microbalrog, your little toe... :confused: \

Oh, and don't get me wrong. There's hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle.

That good "Republican" Tom Davis of Virginia is a perfect example.


As for that particular individual, I wonder if the trip to the range would be out of the question if the person wasn't a cop?

A common citizen with a gun? Uh oh...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top