Private company wishes to build hotel on Justice Souter's land :)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was discussing this possibility just the other day: that I would hope one of them would get nailed by the own filth they passed onto the rest of us. Only, I wish one of them lost their primary residence, not just undeveloped land they owned. Maybe that'll teach them a lesson

Then again...nah. Not likely.
 
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
Click to expand...

Works for me!
 
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
Press Release

For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.

# # #

Logan Darrow Clements
Freestar Media, LLC

Phone 310-593-4843
[email protected]
http://www.freestarmedia.com
Click to expand...
 
Hopefully, the developer's plans go through. Until then I hold my, "He** yeah!"s.
 
I am in a quandry...

... I have called it un-American to make this sort of a land grab. But, the victim. Oh my. I also call the planned and plotted taking of life murder. But could I call it murder or courthouse cleansing in the cases of the DISHONORABLE five?

But I would fight against the ultimate solution for these bastids. I want them to live forever so they can view the damage they have unleashed as it unfolds around them and people realize who did it to them and pound forever on their vile heads.

rr
 
Even if this plan is carried out (which I highly doubt), Souter will probably get 1.3 X more than the value of his property.

Or, even if he gets only the fair market value, it will probably be for a huge profit after he pays off his loan.

Then everyone who agrees with the court's decision will point to this case and say, "what, it happened to Souter and he didn't have a problem with it."
 
Well well, it seems that New Hampshire already has a law on the books prohibiting the taking of land for private use. Did the learned Justice Souter already know this when he voted?
 
I just hope the "just compensation" is less than the remaining value of his mortgage. Or at least less than fair market value. :neener:

Kharn
 
There shouldn't be a mortgage if it's already been in his family for a long time. :D

As far as the comment on the "land-grab"...well, we did that to the people who were already living on these lands before the white man arrived. :eek:

I've always wondered if some Gov't entity is going to come crashing through my door late at night for being in possession of stolen property (my land and house). :eek:

Leave it to the Gov't to force me to pay taxes on something they stole. :eek:

Everyone have a nice 4th! Ah, yes, the time to celebrate the fact that our founding fathers were traitors to their country because they didn't want to pay a tea tax...try that today and see where it'll get you. Celebrate responsibly!
 
Everyone have a nice 4th! Ah, yes, the time to celebrate the fact that our founding fathers were traitors to their country because they didn't want to pay a tea tax...
Click to expand...

You honestly think that's all there was to it?
 
The letter they sent:

Monday, June 27, 2005

Mr. Chip Meany
Code Enforcement Officer
Town of Weare, New Hampshire
Fax 603-529-4554


Dear Mr. Meany,

I am proposing to build a hotel at 34 Cilley Hill Road in the Town of Weare. I would like to know the process your town has for allowing such a development.




Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, "Kelo vs. City of New London" clears the way for this land to be taken by the Government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare.

As I understand it your town has five people serving on the Board of Selectmen. Therefore, since it will require only three people to vote in favor of the use of eminent domain I am quite confident that this hotel development is a viable project. I am currently seeking investors and hotel plans from an architect. Please let me know the proper steps to follow to proceed in accordance with the law in your town.



Thank you.


Sincerely,


Logan Darrow Clements
Freestar Media, LLC
Click to expand...

I hope it's more than just a home to him. I hope it's a piece of land that has been in the family for generations. I hope he was raised there, and saw any children he has take their first steps there. I hope it really means something to him. Then, maybe, he can feel the consequenses of his traitorous actions.
 
could you call it murder or courthouse cleansing? and did Souter know ??/

Just food for thought on some points brought up above:
The accepted definition of murder is the willful taking of a life where that life does not merit its destruction, i.e. taking innocent life.
I the accepted sense, it also includes the willful taking of life where the killer does not know with reasonable certainty that the victim merits death.
that is, the Beltway Snipers may have killed a really bad bad badguy -but since they had no way to know that, it is still murder.

In days past, people killed over land and property (horses, etc) esp when those items were more closely tied to survival- steal an early 19th century rural farmers herd, and he may well have starved to death, making it a life or death affair and justifying deadly force against the thieving party.

Question is, does the same apply to the folks in new London? are they truly in danger of death or grave bodily harm? is it a case by case decision?
Now, history is clear what tends to happen to corrupt politicians. But the question put today is wether is it "murder" or "Courthouse cleaning", regarding the 'dishonorable five'. Is the city council who approves the ED-ing of your house just as guilty? The county assessor, same question? the police officer who comes to make sure you come along quietly to your new apartment?
This, everyone will have to decide for themselves- a difficult decision with grave importance!

(pause)

Also asked was if Souter knew ahead of time that his place was safe in NH. DOESN'T MATTER!!!! if it is, you appeal and cite the Kelo ruling, asking to override state authority; then go after some other property of his in another state. This will force the matter to a head again, and invite reform.
if not, you draft up a plan that meets the requirements to show the proposed growth, etc and convince the city to let you do it! THEN, don't build anything. This also forces the issue to the front, and highlights the areas already blighted with this issue so folks can see that nothing came of it but broken lives- no hotel, no marina, nada; just evicted americans who in good faith bought a home.

Obviously, it would be better if Souter's house was vulnerable, but all is not lost if its not.
Any pro bono lawyers out there wanna take this on?
C-
 
Ever since this ruling I have been hearing the strangest things--liberal anti-gun Democrats asking me how they can go about obtaining firearms, and proclaiming that they will fight to the death if Walmart or anyone else tries to take their homes, stuff like that. I think this ruling brings us one step closer to the $h!thammer coming down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

W
  • Locked
Souter's Home to a Developer??
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
RooK
R
L
  • Locked
Eminent Domain Revenge
Replies
2
Views
393
Beren
Beren
D
  • Locked
Monetary help can ge given for "Lost Liberty Hotel" Proposed on Justice Souter's Land
Replies
6
Views
387
jnojr
jnojr
W
  • Locked
Libertarians Propose Taking Breyer's Land
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
Vang
V
D
  • Locked
New Hampshire town inundated with support to take justice's home
Replies
3
Views
491
280PLUS
2
Back
Top