Progressive or single stage for beginner?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Loco,

Your commentary is giving me enough information to tell me you need to consider something that creates volume. That said, your commentary is also telling me cost is an issue for you. For you, the deciding factor on which press to buy is how much time you have to reload and what your actual quantity is.

Based on your commentary, here's where I suggest you think about and/or look at.

1. How many rounds you are actually shooting in a month's time now.

2. How much actual cash you (and your brother, since he's involved) have to spend on equipment right now. Yes, the cost is amortized over a period of time, but the actual cash in your wallet isn't.

3. How many rounds you are actually shooting combined with how many rounds your brother is shooting over a month's time now.

4. If you want to save even more money by casting your own bullets, which means the eventual purchase of casting equipment. (Of course, casting your own bullet could be a problem that can be solved "later." But if cost is an issue, casting your own pistol bullets can reduce costs to less than $2.00 a box of 50, so seriously worth consideration.

5. A compromise - you need volume, but you may want to slow down and learn, depending on your mechanical aptitude. If it's high, no problem with a progressive such as a Hornady LnL or a Dillon 550/650 If it's lower, you may be better off with something simpler, like a semi automated turret such as the Lee Classic Turret.

6. How many rounds you are shooting per month now and how many you might want to shoot per month for the same cost or less cost.

7. How much of your budget can you spend on components? (Hint: It's about the same as you can afford to spend on ammo now.)

8. How much time you have to spend shooting and reloading. The more time you have, the more you can spend. A man with a wife and kids has less. A man who's retired, who's kids are grown or who is single has more.

9. How much you're actually shooting and are likely to shoot.

Conclusion:

Notice how the statement how much you're shooting keeps popping up?

Here's some loading rates for various presses that go from low average to press potential. (Note these are my own estimates and are in no way scientific. I didn not put the reloader on a stop watch and they're only to get you in the ball park.):

1. single stage press (pick brand) - If your a working man with kids and are well organized, you'll be challenged to turn out 200 rounds of rifle ammo per week at best if you work every night, with each step a single focused step. However, your ammo will be very accurate if you do it right.

2. Standard turret press (pick the brand) - you can reduce the time for those 200 rifle rounds per week down to three nights work vs. 4-5 days of single stage work. Again, this is including trimming, etc.

3. Lee Classic Turret press - 200-300 rounds per hour when they're using it with the Safety Prime and the Pro Auto Disk powder measure. I mention it alone because it's unique in design and function at the present, because it's an auto rotating turret.

4. Dillon 550 - 300 to 550 rounds per hour. Adding a casefeeder to one you already own adds about 20-25% production to this rate. I suspect the RCBS 2000 to be about the same rate, but to my knowledge, RCBS does not offer a casefeeder for it. If you don't already own one, I wouldn't buy one with a casefeeder. Insteady I'd opt for:

5. Hornady LnL and Dillon 650 - 400 to 700 rounds per hour. The upper level rates depend on you having such things as casefeeders or a highly organized/ergonomic setup as well as either extra primer tubes pre filled or a vibra prime primer filler.

6. Dillon 1050 - 1050 an hour, this press is approaching a low end professional grade reloader, so it's quite expensive. This is for the serious competition shooter or some who shoots a helluva lot or has little time and lots of money and who wants to shoot a lot.

Ok, what do all those rates mean?

1. Convert the rounds per hour to boxes of ammo for the gun you shoot and see how many boxes you think you'll need per week.
2. Think about how much time you spend shooting at the range and how much free time you have to load. The lower the amount of time you have to spend reloading, the faster a machine you'll want.
3. Be conservative in your thinking. After all, it does you no darn good to have a press capable of 650 rounds per hour if you can't afford to keep it in primers, powder and bullets. Better to have a slow press you can keep fed. Trade off time for money. Kinda how it works with cars too, you'll notice. The guy that can't afford mechanics usually has more time to work on it himself. The guy that can, typically is too busy working to work on his own car anyways. In both cases, ya probably gotta work somewheres some how, no free lunch.

So there you have it, the how to pick it thought process. Good luck with your choice.

Dave
 
Don't ignore the Lee Load Master

I would only add the Lee Load Master as an economical progressive. For less than $250 you can be up and running quickly. I set one up three weeks ago in less than two hours, including the time to bolt it to the bench. It is very easy to set up; just follow the video directions on the Lee website.

It will load a ton of ammo--here's the setup link and a demo link showing it in operation at a rate of 900+ rounds / hours(short demo--nobody's going to watch it spit out rounds for an hour! It is in the text below quoted from another thread.)

http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=600465

This is taken from another thread and shows the video link to operation--

"So just for fun, boys, here, without sound so you'll have to count the flashes as loaded rounds drop into the RED bucket,is another take on the Load Master, make this Take Two. The resolution is a little ragged because I'm trying to make the batteries last in the camera--but the loaded rounds are clearly seen.

Elapsed time is actually 79 seconds when I run the file in

Windows Media Player--the upload to Photobucket added 2 seconds.

http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l...plusperhour.flv

20 rounds spit out in 79 seconds which is 900+ rounds per hour. Watch out Uncle Don--I'm after your record!

I emphasize--in no way was I hustling on this. If I really get organized and get this danged hand well, 1000+ is going to be easy."

Don't let people tell you it is not a quality press--it is strong; solid and when set up properly, which is easy, operates smoothly. I have had zero problems with it.

If you decide you don't like reloading you haven't invested big $$ and can easily sell it.
 
I've been reloading for the better part of 35yrs and my advice is this. First and foremost buy a good reloading manual,IMHO Lyman manual#48 read it then read it again makes sure you understand the reloading process.Then make the decission on which equipment. I statred with the old lee loader as did a previous gentlemen (ask about how you primed cases:what: )
My next press was An RCBS rockchucker good solid press but I learned the steps sizing,primeing etc. Went to a Dillon 450 then a 550 then the 650. Again If you know someone that reloads ask
if he'll teach you the ropes and above all else in reloading TAKE YOUR TIME reloading is not a competitive sport so what if you load 200 rds rather than 250 ,as you gain experience you be able to load with more comfidence and increase your speed.
I still have my RCBS as it does thing that my Dillon can't ie
reforming cases but that's a tale for another time
 
My brother and i shoot around 1800 a month so it sure sounds like i would never be able to keep up with a single stage. Money is really not a factor because my brothers buying. He gave me a 1000 to buy what ever i need to get into reloading. It's not everyday that my brother pulls money out of his pocket so i really not afraid to spend it. Something tells me he's getting a good deal having someone reload for him for the rest of his life for a thousand bucks. Little brothers get away with murder. Anyway, thanks all for all the info. You guys have been a great help. I made up my mind and I think i'am going to go with the Dillion 650.
Thanks Again
Loco
 
I've used a Rockchucker for over 30 years. But, for loading lots of handgun ammo, it's a real pain. Just over a year ago, I bought a Hornady Lock & Load from Cabela's. I researched the various gun groups and felt the LNL gave the most bang for the buck. I haven't been disappointed. If you know that you'll be reloading a lot of ammo, I'd go progressive.

Start out loading one case at a time to get up to speed. A Dillon or LNL are both high quality machines that will hold their value. I always tell my wife that I like to buy good quality stuff because it will bring good money at my estate sale and she can use the money to run off with "Juan, the pool boy".

Cabela's has a deal on LNL's going on (last time I looked). $50.00 "Cabela's bucks" which puts the price at $300.00. You might want to look at this: http://www.cs.odu.edu/~rtompkin/hornady/blue.php

Cloudpeak
 
if i could do it over, i might consider a 3 stage turret for my first press.

i went with a lee single stage, then several pro 1000s (they work well for me) and just recently got a 3 stage turret for rifle rounds.

so far i think its the best compromise between volume and precision, wish i had bought one sooner, and for 50ish dollars new off midway, they really are a good deal.

i haven't had a chance to purchase one of those new saftey primes for it though. but you can chug along pretty well just by placing the primers by hand.

another nice thing about it is you can remove the rod that makes it auto index (it literally just lifts out) and now you can do batches/ single stage loading a bit easier until your more comfortable with the system.
 
my first press was a dillon 550, and I'll probably keep loading on it until the lever breaks off (then I'll call dillon and they'll probably send me a new one free of charge :) )

atek3
 
Well I'm a newbie when it comes to reloading. Yet I can see just how dangerous it can be if even one round is not loaded properly. SO with a progressive setup one is turning out many rounds an hour. Some here are reporting rates as great or greater than 1 round per second. It seems to me that one is taking for granted the danger involved and safety is taking a backseat to speed.
 
I started out on progressive stage...personally I did not feel it was that difficult at all just got to multi task and pay attention (had a good teacher also).

If you have any friends or family who reload you should check out their setup and try and learn from them if possible.

Progressive stage is significantly quicker but speed comes with time and you may not want to have speed beginning. Its like giving a 16 year old a permit and then give him a ferrari f350 as a daily driver...bad IDEA.
 
dragongoddess said:
Well I'm a newbie when it comes to reloading. Yet I can see just how dangerous it can be if even one round is not loaded properly. SO with a progressive setup one is turning out many rounds an hour. Some here are reporting rates as great or greater than 1 round per second. It seems to me that one is taking for granted the danger involved and safety is taking a backseat to speed.

Um, one round per second is 3600 rounds per hour. Nobody has claimed that. I don't think anyone that reloads takes the "danger" for granted. With a progressive press, one doesn't sacrifice safety for speed. I'd argue that a self-indexing press with a low powder sensor is "safer" than any single stage.

With good equipment, the tradeoff isn't safety for speed, the tradeoff is $$$ for speed. You get what you pay for. Do you feel safe firing factory ammo? How quickly do you think that is produced? (I'll give you a hint - it's much faster than one round per second). The equipment that makes it is big bucks.
 
Powder checkers are available for most progressive presses. the likelyhood of a dangerous round being produced is low to zero. In the nearly 25,000 rounds I've done--begnning as a complete newbie with the progressive--I have had NO bad rounds.
 
I started out on a pimped out Dillon 650. I may not be as mechanically gifted as some, because it took me quite a while to setup. A few years later, I was able to setup a super 1050 much easier because I knew what I was doing. The learning curve is a lot steeper with the progressive, but the ammo rates are undeniably better. I highly recommend the XL 650 if you decide you really want a progressive and you can afford it. I have good and bad stuff about the Loadmaster. I recently acquired one pretty cheap. I kind of feel like I got what I paid for it. I may keep it for smaller batches of certain types, but I certainly will not be using for my favorite ammo.

-Lonnie
 
Medula,

What great childhood memories you a creating. I get all teary-eyed thinking about how lucky your kids are. It's a shame all kids can't have a parent like you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top