Man, ccsniper, take a look over at the akfiles "SVD and Romak III forums. Tons of PSL and SVD owners. Many who seriously know there stuff.
Allot of guys get one of these, dump 200 rounds of surpluss crap down the tube and can't hit ****.
I have a PSL and I like it just fine. So far I have put about 600 rounds down range and I would say 1.5 to 2 MOA is as good as cheap surplus is gonna get Ya. And thats on a bag "trying"!! But...it aint the final word.
Nearly all of the surplus lightball 7.62x54r is low cost high production rpk machine gun ammo. What does this mean? It's not accurate. <--period. Not consistently at any rate. And why? Because it has few consistent components as in, bullet weight, amount of propellant from case to case and so on. To get consistent accuracy it requires consistent ammo even mach grade.
If You search around You will find reports from shooters using the PSL with Russian 7n14 (russin marksman ammo) These reports usually grade the rifle at about 1.5 MOA. Or about the same performance as the SVD. A few shooters hand load ammo and get similar or better results. I have read 1 MOA or 1 inch at 100 yards and 10 inches at 1000 yards. This I won't believe til I see it.
The SVD and PSL are ....SDMRs (semi automatic designated marksman rifle) They both play nearly the same roll. The difference between these rifles are as follows, PSL =stamped steel receiver and an akm style long stroke gas piston action . SVD =milled receiver and a slightly modified shorter gas piston action. Both rifles have a 1 in 12 inch twist. As far as the cost the PSL is widely available in the U.S. and the SVD is no longer imported nor is the sporterized version, the Tigr. This alone is the biggest reason for the huge price difference. And the SVD is super sexy. But many who own both will admit, the SVD performs little or no better!!!! And that's no BS. He who argues is simply defending his pride and a four thousand dollar purchase.
whew, sorry long winded.