PTR-91 vs. VERP

Status
Not open for further replies.

klover

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
675
Location
North central Idaho
Been thinking about another black rifle in .308 or so caliber. There are probably more moving parts in the PTR, but perhaps it's a better design than the VERP.
May be accuracy is better in the PTR? What did you do to pimp out your PTR?

Black rifles are for repelling pirates on the high seas, and for hunting Elk on tropical islands (I just want one that's all).:neener:
 
Um, I think you mean VEPR, not VERP. The VEPR is a semi-auto rifle based on the Soviet RPK light machine gun. It looks a lot like an AK and uses the same operating system. A VERP is what happens when you burp and vomit comes up. :barf: Nasty.

It's hard to compare the VEPR and the PTR-91. The VEPR is a semi-auto clone of an assault rifle. It is smaller and lighter and generally fires an intermediate cartridge (typically 7.62x39, but they make them in .223 and 5.45x39 also, as well as possibly other cartridges).

The PTR-91 is a semi-auto version of the G3 battle rifle. It is longer, heavier and fires the full power 7.62x51 NATO (aka .308 Winchester) cartridge. It hits a lot harder than the VEPR and at much longer ranges.

The VEPR is gas operated. The PTR-91 uses a roller-locked, delayed blowback system. Neither are known for having good ergonomics.

The PTR-91 is probably more accurate. Mine does 2 MOA at 100 yards with iron sights and cheap milsurp ammo, and I can get sub-1" groups with match grade ammo and a scope. The VEPR is known as being very accurate for an AK-style gun, but I doubt it will be quite that accurate. Both are certainly "minute-of-enemy" out to 300 yards, though, and are plenty accurate for every conceivable use other than high power target matches.

Which one you get is a matter of personal preference. Get both if you can, as they are very different rifles.

I have a PTR-91. It's "pimped out" with a wide forearm, folding HK bipod, claw-type scope mount with picatinny rail, 4-14x44 Burris scope, removable cheekpiece, slip on recoil pad, Rooster tactical sling and Tac-Latch mag release. It also had a trigger job by Bill Springfield. Next on the list is to get the muzzle threaded (mine is a ban-era model) and a can for it.
 
Vepr or PTR91

The Vepr isn't really any lighter.
9.0lbs v. 9.17 lbs

The Vepr is more affordable.

I think accuracy may be a wash. The HKs I've shot were never really that accurate (decent but not great). I haven't gotten around to buying a Vepr yet.

The main advantage that the PTR91 will have (and this is a big on) is cheap magazines.
 
I was basing my assessment of size/weight on the VEPR's I've seen, which have been VEPR K models in 7.62x39 and 5.45x39. In looking at the Robinson website, it looks like they do indeed make a VEPR in .308, but it's no carbine. It has a 20.5" barrel. I'll take the word of others on weight, but given the thick steel used for the receiver, it probably is quite a bit heavier than a standard AK.

According to Robinson's website, the Vepr (and VEPR II) in .308 take proprietary 5 and 10 round magazines. Robinson sells the .308 mags for $39.99 each.

The website says that they are working on 20 round mags, but they are not yet available. When they are available, you will have to have your VEPR "converted" to accept them.

By comparison, the PTR-91 uses standard G3 mags. 20 round G3 mags are plentiful and cheap. I was just looking at Shotgun News last night and saw several vendors offering them for $1 to $2 each. I have about 50 of them.
 
I have the SAIGA 308 and a PTR's - currently the folding stock version and have had a VEPR. The Saiga ('lil antelope) line is (was) the inexpensive version of the VEPR (wild hog) but are no longer available as regular dealer stock. The PTR and SAIGA (VEPR) are about equally accurate - depending on the ammo. Magazine availability and black rifle factor favors the PTR over the VEPR. Both designes are proven and should not give you any problems. The PTR will cost you more as there are more accessories available but will also give you alot more fun factor imo.
 
I should add that anyone buying a PTR-91 needs to factor in the cost of a trigger job. The PTR-91 comes with a really terrible trigger. It typically breaks at about 12-14 pounds, and then only after take-up of a lot of slack, and plenty of very gritty creep. By contrast, the trigger on every VEPR I've ever handled has been excellent.

The good news is that Bill Springfield does excellent work on PTR-91 (and HK 91 and CETME) triggers for just $35, which includes return shipping. You just mail him the trigger pack (easily removed with a field strip), and you'll have it back in just a few days with the creep gone and a nice clean break at about 5 pounds.

Williams Trigger Specialties also does excellent work on the 91/CETME, including an awesome set trigger that breaks at just a few pounds. Williams costs a lot more than Springfield, though -- something like $75 for the basic trigger job and several hundred for the set trigger.
 
The Vepr is actually pretty accurate though it suffers from the very bad factory AK leaf site. I guess it is not that bad, but compared to say an M1A peep site, it sucks. You will need to upgrade to a peep site (Mojo) or some sort of scope mount. I thought I printed decent groups with mine considering the sights.

I thought the only reason for buying a Vepr .308 was you couldn't afford better stuff. I don't know how accurate they are though. Might be okay.

I thought I heard that a Vepr was a Russian bear if some sort.
 
Anyone have the contact info for Bill Springfield? I plan on purchasing a PTR91 at the end of this month, ironically I'll also be getting a VEPR 7.62x39 at the same time. I'm on a serious uncontrollable gun buying spree. Something with my wifes great grandma and a rather nice inheritance.
 
Bill Springfield is my savior.


I say get the PTR while you can still pick up mags for $2 a pop.
 
How is the PTR quality compared to an actual HK? Who sells them? Are these put together by CAI's chimps?

What kind of barrels? What kind of receiver? What parts?
 
The PTR91 is made in America by JLD Enterprises. Quality is supposed to be on par and some say even better than original HK. They are made on actual HK tooling and many parts are HK.
 
Kestrel said:
How is the PTR quality compared to an actual HK? Who sells them? Are these put together by CAI's chimps?

What kind of barrels? What kind of receiver? What parts?

The PTR's quality is excellent. They are made by JLD Enterprises. JLD is Jose Luis Diaz, who used to be (maybe still is) a South American importer/distributor for H&K.

As you may know, the H&K 91 is simply a semi-automatic version of the German G3 battle rifle. The G3 was the standard issue battle rifle of many countries from the 1950s to the 1990s. One of those countries was Portugal. A company known as Fabrica Militar de Braco de Prata in Portugal built the G3 for the Portuguese military under license from H&K. When the Portuguese military adopted a new main battle rifle, Jose Diaz bought out Fabrica Militar's tooling and parts inventory, and moved it all to the U.S. He established a company called JLD Enterprises in Connecticut, which uses the tooling and parts to make the PTR-91.

If you know the story of DSA (David Selvaggio Arms) and the SA58 series semi-auto FAL clones, then you know that it is an almost identical story. The difference is that David Selvaggio bought out Steyr's FN-licensed FAL tooling and FAL parts inventory, whereas Jose Luis Diaz bought out Fabrica Militar's H&K-licensed G3 tooling and parts inventory. Both set them up in the U.S. to manufacture excellent quality semi-auto battle rifles using the same tooling.

In my experience, the PTR-91 is indeed better than most "authentic" H&K 91's I've examined. The PTR-91 shows great care in the welds, which tend to be fairly rough in original H&K's, and the finish on the PTR-91 seems to be more evenly applied and more durable. The latter is probably due in part to advances in metal finishing technology, as no H&K 91's have been imported for more than 15 years now (I think the last ones came into the U.S. in 1989).

The PTR-91's do use some reconditioned G3 parts, but it doesn't appear to be many. They use quite a few U.S.-made parts, including of course the receiver, which is made by JLD on the former Fabrica Militar tooling. The PTR-91 also comes with a new, match-grade heavy barrel. It is a heavier contour than you will find on an H&K 91.

I have not had the opportunity to shoot an H&K 91 side by side with my PTR-91. I have examined them side by side, though, and found the PTR-91 to be at least the equal in appearance of the H&K 91, and in many cases better. My PTR-91 is also very accurate for a battle rifle, and that is a common report from PTR-91 owners. The H&K 91 also has an excellent reputation for accuracy, but I have not heard that it is any more accurate than the PTR-91. In fact, I highly doubt that it is, given the heavier/stiffer barrel of the PTR-91.

The only advantage that I see of the H&K 91 over the PTR-91 is the collector value. H&K's were imported in very limited numbers, and no more will ever be imported. Prices will likely only go up from here. The PTR-91 is still in production, and will probably never have any significant collector value. You can buy three PTR-91's for the cost of a single H&K 91, however, and I buy my guns to shoot, so I chose the PTR-91.
 
Kestrel said:
How is the PTR quality compared to an actual HK? Who sells them? Are these put together by CAI's chimps?

What kind of barrels? What kind of receiver? What parts?

I forgot to say -- NO! THE PTR-91 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CENTURY/CAI! The PTR-91 is entirely built by JLD Enterprises. You will sometimes find semi-auto G3 clones assembled by others using JLD receivers, but the PTR-91 is entirely a JLD product.

For more info, visit www.jldenter.com
 
Yeah, the PTR has aftermarket hi-caps a'plenty, but the VEPR .308 doesn't. That's the main difference.

A VERP is what happens when you burp and vomit comes up.

LMAO!
 
FNB,

Thanks for the great info. Do you have any idea as to how the heat treating compares between the HK and the PTR? (I know the HKs have great heat treating.) I wonder if the PTRs are as long-lasting.

They sound interesting.

Thanks again.
 
Sorry, Kestrel. I don't know anything about how the heat treatment (or the alloys used, for that matter) might differ. I suggest you call JLD and ask. I bet they'd be happy to tell you.

I also don't know anything about relative durability. The G3 in all its forms, including the H&K 91, certainly has an excellent reputation for durability. I've never heard any complaints about the PTR-91's durability, and I doubt there would be any. It's a very robust design, and by all accounts the PTR-91 is very well made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top