The groove diameter of your barrel may be oversized and the base of the bullet may not be expanding enough to seal with the barrel and causing the leading. Typical factory barrels are .355"-.356" but some are oversized at .357"+, which will require you to use higher powder charge to expand the lead base of FMJ.
arthury said:
I'd expect super high velocity and magnum pressure can certainly melt the lead but 4gr of BullsEye?
High pressure powder ignition gas may melt lube around lead bullets but will not melt lead - instead, it will blow loose lead particles towards the muzzle end of the barrel. You need sufficient chamber pressure to expand the exposed lead base of FMJ to seal with the barrel. If the powder charge is not high enough, you may get lead particles leaking around the bullet as the bullet travels down the barrel causing lead deposits.
2004 Alliant load data lists 5.0 gr max powder charge for 115 gr FMJ bullet. I use Winchester 115 gr FMJ with 4.2-4.4 gr of Bullseye with 1.135" OAL. My various pistol barrels are .355"-.356" and I do not experience the same problem you are having. For your next range trip, you could load 10 test rounds of 4.2, 4.4 and 4.6 gr and see if the leading decreases. Take a cleaning kit with you and clean between incremental powder charges. +1 on copper scrubber (Chore boy) wrapped around an old bore brush - few strokes back and forth and leading is gone!
If higher powder charges do not resolve your leading issue, you could consider using CMJ or JHP bullets. MG CMJ bullet are FMJ bullets with a metal disk at the base to cover the exposed lead.
I have shot Montana Gold FMJ for match shooting and many have gone to JHP for cleaner shooting. My match load using 165 gr 40S&W FMJ (RNFP) vs JHP is comparable in accuracy due to mid-to-high range load data I use for target loads but in theory, at high-to-near max load data, the FMJ load has higher potential for accuracy due to the exposed lead base.