RaymondMillbrae
Member
Hey Folks,
I'm back again with yet another question. This time it's in regards to reticles and point of aim. Let me try to make my query understandable.
My buddy and me were speaking the other day and the topic came up: Why does the point of aim change when you have the crosshairs on a target using high power magnification - but when you go to low power magnification (while still having the target in your crosshairs) you will not be centered?
Did that make sense to yall?
In other words, I have always understood that if I zeroed my crosshairs on a target using high power magnification, that I must always place it back in full magnification prior to shooting...for precision. But if the truth be told, I never really understood why this was.
If someone could shed some technical light on this topic - IN AN INTELLIGABLE WAY - I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
In Christ: Raymond
I'm back again with yet another question. This time it's in regards to reticles and point of aim. Let me try to make my query understandable.
My buddy and me were speaking the other day and the topic came up: Why does the point of aim change when you have the crosshairs on a target using high power magnification - but when you go to low power magnification (while still having the target in your crosshairs) you will not be centered?
Did that make sense to yall?
In other words, I have always understood that if I zeroed my crosshairs on a target using high power magnification, that I must always place it back in full magnification prior to shooting...for precision. But if the truth be told, I never really understood why this was.
If someone could shed some technical light on this topic - IN AN INTELLIGABLE WAY - I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
In Christ: Raymond