Twiki357
Member
This question came up then I read post #162 by JohnBT on the thread about Cavalry Arms. In the post, the purchaser pled guilty to making false statements to purchase 40 guns from another state. Part of the case against Cavalry Arms was selling four hand guns to a person from another state.
It made me wonder about the FFL license. Can the FFL holder operate in any state, or is the license state specific? The reason I ask is because a few years ago I purchased a handgun from a dealer at a gun show in Phoenix, AZ (He did all the paperwork & background check.) But, he did not automatically issue me a receipt. I had to ask him for it. After I got home I noticed that the only address printed on the receipt was in Las Vegas, NV, no indication that he had any operations in Arizona other than his presence at the gun show and he did not collect sales tax.
Without getting into the local business license, tax collection issue, was this a legal transaction from the FFL standpoint?
And in the Cavalry Arms case, if the purchaser had not illegally acquired AZ ID, could not the owner of Cavalry Arms have just crossed into California and had a legal transaction with a CA resident, assuming that the guns were legal in CA?
I'm just trying to get a better understanding of some of the ridiculous ATF regulations.
It made me wonder about the FFL license. Can the FFL holder operate in any state, or is the license state specific? The reason I ask is because a few years ago I purchased a handgun from a dealer at a gun show in Phoenix, AZ (He did all the paperwork & background check.) But, he did not automatically issue me a receipt. I had to ask him for it. After I got home I noticed that the only address printed on the receipt was in Las Vegas, NV, no indication that he had any operations in Arizona other than his presence at the gun show and he did not collect sales tax.
Without getting into the local business license, tax collection issue, was this a legal transaction from the FFL standpoint?
And in the Cavalry Arms case, if the purchaser had not illegally acquired AZ ID, could not the owner of Cavalry Arms have just crossed into California and had a legal transaction with a CA resident, assuming that the guns were legal in CA?
I'm just trying to get a better understanding of some of the ridiculous ATF regulations.