Questions: 2 crusty old Winchester 94's

silicosys4

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
3,737
Just picked these up from the same LGS that I got my first one from a few months ago. Strange that locally there was a drought of pre-64 M94's for years, and all of the sudden they are dropping from the sky.

Anyways, I have a 1949 M94 that seems pretty straightforward, just a slick smooth pre-64 M94 with honest wear, no rust, and a good bore. I don't think there is anything special about this one but I could be mistaken. How original do you think this is, particularly the stock finish? I don't know much about these M94's, but my '62 had a varnished stock, and this one appears to be oil finished.

left side dirty full.jpg

right side dirty full.jpg

bottom dirty serial number blacked.jpg

receiver left side dirty.jpg

right side receiver dirty.jpg

barrel markings dirty.jpg

barrel right dirty.jpg

rusty butt.jpg

under lever dirty.jpg

Next rifle is a bit more interesting, I think
 
And this one is a stumper. I cannot find a production date for this serial number. I believe it to be perhaps 1943 or 44. The color of the stock is so...garish compared to other Winchester's i've owned that I suspect its been refinished and stained. What do you all think on this one, what do you think the production date is, and how original it all is?
Its got some old paint on parts of the barrel and loooots of grime, this one will look much better once I go over it.
I paid less than $700 for each of them so I don't think I got hurt too bad.

left side full.jpg

receiver left dirty2.jpg

receiver right dirty.jpg

barrel front left dirty.jpg

barrel left dirty front.jpg

under lever dirty.jpg

butt stock dirty.jpg

butt stock right side dirty.jpg

rusty butt.jpg

And whats up with this extra barrel band notch in the magazine tube and barrel?

barrel cut.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have a 1949 M94 carbine that I'm sure has never been re-finished as it's been in the family since new, and always well treated (but well used) so I don't think it's ever needed a "re-finish". And the overall condition of the rifle is excellent, which would indicate to me that the wood has never been banged up without any scars on the metal. I've not given it much thought, but the stock does not seem to be varnished, more of a oil type finish. ?

Those extra notches on the barrel and magazine...that's a new one on me. However, good deal and I bet they will clean up nicely.
 
I have one from the 40s ill check to see if it has a extra sling mount. I don't think it does, though it'd be handy for a sling though! nice find! If you got the extra coin and everything looks good rifling etc Id think about sending one into a place like Turnbull's, it would come back looking factory fresh and better depending what you'd have them do.
 
Last edited:
And this one is a stumper. I cannot find a production date for this serial number. I believe it to be perhaps 1943 or 44. The color of the stock is so...garish compared to other Winchester's i've owned that I suspect its been refinished and stained. What do you all think on this one, what do you think the production date is, and how original it all is?
Its got some old paint on parts of the barrel and loooots of grime, this one will look much better once I go over it.
I paid less than $700 for each of them so I don't think I got hurt too bad.

View attachment 1152329

View attachment 1152330

View attachment 1152331

View attachment 1152332

View attachment 1152333

View attachment 1152334

View attachment 1152335

View attachment 1152336

View attachment 1152337

And whats up with this extra barrel band notch in the magazine tube and barrel?

View attachment 1152342
Was Winchester building lever guns in 1943-44? Almost all firearms manufacturers (and car makers) were dedicated exclusively to war production until the end of WW2 in mid '45.
 
Just checked my LGS, they have several pre 64s the cheapest was $1400.00 all the way up to $4000. I'd say you got a pretty good deal.
 
I would definitely get a factory letter from the Buffalo Bill museum in Cody Wy. on the one you think is a '43 or '44 . I believe the Govt. bought some for issue to national guard in the northwest ? Or by Canada ? The extra notches look like they may be for sling swivels ? I would want to make sure if it was mine . You may have found something special there .
 
On that second carbine, looks like a barrel date of 1941. From what I'm finding online, 1,307,XXX is right at the end of production for 1941, perhaps even into December, so I'm curious as to whether this gun has any kind of wartime history. Probably not because I see no stampings or markings indicating government issue, but still interesting to ponder.

barrel stamp and date serial number blacked.jpg

The extra barrel band notch on both the magazine and barrel are interesting.
 
Last edited:
the '41 cleaned up nicely. Whatever was on it..paint, varnish, dried blood, whatever it was, a dirty red/brown color, took acetone to get off. It took a few hours and a roll of paper towels, but I got it all off and surprisingly, there was a lot of bluing left over. Overall I'd say this is probably about a what, 95% gun i'd say.

left side clean good.jpg

right side full clean.jpg

right side receiver good clean.jpg

left side clean receiver.jpg

top receiver.jpg

tang markings.jpg

Even the butt plate cleaned off without being too chewed up. Some pitting but not as bad as I was expecting.

clean butt.jpg

And a nice mirror bore
bore.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think that most of the 94s manufactured during WW2 had flat bands just behind the front sight. My go to rifle still IS a 1949 model 94 .30 WCF that I bought when I was 18. That was 62 years ago.

Wow, I wonder if our '49's are close in serial number.
 
With a 1941 barrel that could well be a war time production rifle . In that condition I'd say you can a lot more than double your money .
 
Back
Top