otomik said:it's a Sigma, which is Glock with a worse trigger.
okay it's got some different styling and changable grips and different tactical mounts but it's a Sigma still. It's like that episode of the Simpsons were the geniuses at the Malibu Stacy company add a new hat accessory but don't really make any effort otherwise.
Yeah, incorrect.it's a Sigma, which is Glock with a worse trigger.
okay it's got some different styling and changable grips and different tactical mounts but it's a Sigma still.
yeah it's different enough that they won't be sued by glock again, different enough. inspired "don't sue us" design includes a mag disconnect safety and disassembly that doesn't including pulling the trigger. i just feel kind of underwhelmed, another striker fired dao with polymer frame and browning-petter action and this one from a company with treachorous past and now they're giving us "safety features" that they don't have to include and won't be in the police models.Coronach said:In fact, it seems to share no commonality of design with the Sigma whatsoever besides the fact that it is (partially) polymer-framed and made by Smith.
same with the magazine disconnect safety, it's not optional for us peons.For one thing, S&W will only sell versions of the gun with integral locks to us peons. My opinion is S&W can take all of their integral lock guns and shove them where the sun don't shine.
double action onlyIt's made by Smith and Wesson.
It's polymer framed.
It's striker-fired.
really? i'd like to know more, no half-cock from slide allowing a second strike perhaps? that would be nice. could you be more descriptive?In particular, the trigger seems to be unbelievably good, and completely unrelated in either design or feel to that of a Glock or a Sigma.
"the AA2000 instantly makes the 1911 obsolete." Dick Metcalfgvass said:"Have read several articles/reviews and all are very positive. "
From the US gun press, does mean ANYTHING a positive article?
))
Whoop-te-do."the AA2000 instantly makes the 1911 obsolete." Dick Metcalf