Radom, Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jim K

Member.
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
17,847
The previous thread got pretty long, so this will start a new one, same basic subject.

Yesterday, I bought William J. York's book VIS Radom, A Study and Photographic Album of Poland's Finest Pistol.

It does not answer all the questions raised in the previous discussion but some are addressed. One is the question of what was made at Radom in the war years. According to the book, complete pistols were made except for the barrels. For security reasons, all wartime Radom barrels were made at Steyr. The parts "kits" (York's term) with numbered parts, were shipped from Radom to Steyr for assembly and proof/acceptance. This not only put a damper on the theft of guns from the factory but was a security measure during shipment as any guerilla forces intercepting a shipment would not have functional pistols. While this was inefficient, I can see that security was more important than inconvenience under the circumstances.

He also addresses the role of the Znaim facility, though with less detail since there seems little information available. He hints at, but apparently could not confirm, that the Radom tooling and machinery were evacuated not to Steyr itself but to the factory at Znaim. He does reproduce German documents spelling out the hair-tearing that went on as Znaim managers, pressed for production of thousands of "kits", found critical machines missing, and the unskilled labor nearly useless.

He still seems to believe that "77" was at Radom in those years; I plan to write the publisher and see if the author will comment further.

There is considerably more of interest. There are some failings, not counting a couple of inconsequential typographic errors. He provides photos of German and Polish language documents (including the original patent 15567) but translates only excerpts of most documents and no translation at all for the patent document.

Is the book worthwhile? Yes, for anyone interested in those pistols, it is, and I recommend it. Like most worthwhile books, it is not cheap ($60) but writers who do extensive research should be rewarded for their efforts.

Jim
 
Thanks for the preview/review. Mine's on the way. :)
were shipped from Radom to Steyr for assembly and proof/acceptance.
He still seems to believe that "77" was at Radom in those years
These two statements seem to contradict each other, unless the parts were first stamped, then shipped, and then the final assembled pistol received a different stamp.

I don't discount that possibility: might explain why the same eagle/WaA77 was placed on both slide and frame, if they were parts inspected separately and not as a whole pistol (until later).
 
As I understood, he seems to think that "77" was at Radom and inspected the "kit" before it was shipped. That makes sense except that "WaA 77" is also found on Steyr-made K.98k's in the same years.

I suspect that Polish workers, under general German supervision and under threat of execution for failures, did the inspections at Radom as there are marks that appear to be inspection stamps on the slide, frame and other parts. So what did "77" do, and where? I think he (his team) inspected the kits after they were received to make sure they met standards, then they were assembled and proved with "623" (who also inspected K.98k's at Steyr) approving them for acceptance. (I don't know why the division of labor; perhaps one of the teams was at a Steyr satellite factory.)

That the barrels were not made at Radom seems confirmed by the fact that the barrels are marked with only the last three digits of the serial number and in a totally different size and font than the numbers put on at Radom. They also have the "623" mark. Based on the system used elsewhere (including the U.S. with M1911A1 barrels) the barrels were probably made, then proved in a test jig and racked, ready for installation when the kits were received. The final inspection and acceptance (proof) marks on the slide were made after final proving but without the need to take the gun apart to mark the barrel.

Again he doesn't say, but it would seem reasonable that the barrel making equipment was moved out of Radom to Steyr early (mid-1940?), before production resumed in November 1940. That would have been simpler than having Steyr tool up a barrel line and would have made sure the Poles had no means of making barrels.

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top