rec'd from GOA

Status
Not open for further replies.

alan

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,601
Location
sowest pa.
URGENT ALERT!!!
Dingell, McCarthy, Working on 'Compromise' Gun Bill

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org/ordergoamem.htm

"The Gun Owners of America [has] already launched a public campaign
to block the legislation that the NRA supports, warning that the
proposal could 'block millions of additional, honest gun owners from
buying firearms.'" -- Newsweek, April 24, 2007

ACTION:

1. It is imperative that you contact your Representative immediately
and urge him to oppose the McCarthy/Dingell bill. A "compromise"
[read: gun control] deal is in the works and all legislators --
especially those who are pro-gun -- need to hear from gun owners
right away.

GOA members have received a mailing from us within the past week,
asking them to send postcards to their U.S. Senators. It is
IMPERATIVE that you mail those postcards in. We want to increase the
heat on these legislators by deluging them with thousands of
postcards. Now, once you've sent in those postcards, we would ask
you to e-mail the specially-tailored message that is included below
along with contact information.

2. Please circulate this alert to all your pro-gun friends and
family, and encourage them to take action as well.


Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Anti-gun Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) continues his assault on American
gun owners.

Dingell has been tapped by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to broker a
compromise with Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) on H.R. 297, a gun control
bill being pushed in the wake of the Virginia Tech shooting.

The bill provides about $1 billion to the states to "provide the
National Instant Criminal Background Check System [NICS] with all
records concerning persons who are prohibited from possessing or
receiving a firearm... regardless of the elapsed time since the
disqualifying event."

As GOA has pointed out in previous alerts, this could lead to
millions more Americans being included in the FBI's database of
prohibited persons.

Dingell, being a former NRA board member, is in a unique position in
the Congress on Second Amendment issues. Despite the fact that he
betrayed gun owners by supporting the Clinton semi-auto ban, he is
still viewed on the Hill as one of the few pro-gun Democrats.

So his support gives the bill the appearance of having the support of
gun owners, when actually it is the most massive expansion of gun
control in over a decade.

McCarthy, of course, is the most notorious anti-gunner in the
Congress. Her sitting down with Dingell to decide the fate of our
gun rights is like two foxes deciding how to best guard the henhouse.

To make matters worse, Dingell is in negotiations with the NRA to
come up with a 'compromise' as quickly as possible.

The NRA itself told Newsweek in an exclusive interview on April 24
that the group "backs [the] proposed new legislation" in the House.


Newsweek reported, "The NRA's position puts the group at odds with
the Gun Owners of America, which has already launched a public
campaign to block the legislation that the NRA supports, warning that
the proposal could 'block millions of additional, honest gun owners
from buying firearms.'"

Politicians always seek to pass laws in the aftermath of a tragedy,
as if one more law will stop evil people from doing evil deeds.
Instead of passing more and more laws that ultimately will snuff out
our liberty, we should consider repealing gun control laws that
prevent citizens from defending themselves when a madman strikes.

CONTACT INFORMATION: You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action
Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your
Representative the pre-written e-mail message below. And, you can
call your Representative at 202-225-3121 or toll-free at
1-877-762-8762.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Representative:

Gun Owners of America informs me that H.R. 297, a colossal gun
control bill, is on the fast track. I strongly urge you to oppose
this bill.

The Virginia Tech tragedy, which Rep. Carolyn McCarthy is using to
try to push this bill, highlights the failure, not success, of gun
control.

Instead of passing yet more laws that restrict my Second Amendment
rights, Congress should consider repealing the failed gun control
laws already on the books -- laws that increasingly result in
law-abiding adults being disarmed just when they need their guns the
most.

Please oppose the McCarthy bill, H.R. 297, and let me know what you
intend to do.

Sincerely,


****************************

"Live Fire" radio with Larry Pratt is broadcast by the Information
Radio Network on Saturdays at 12:00 Noon Eastern. "Live Fire" is
simulcast on the web at http://inforadionet.com and previous episodes
are archived at http://www.soundwaves2000.com/livefire/ with a number
of listening formats supported.

Podcasts are now available!

Recent guests, among many others, have included:

* Bob Levy, attorney in Parker v. DC
* Former Rep. Tom DeLay
* Dr. John Lott
* Col. David Hunt

Posters note:

Should readers not care for the pre-writtten letter seen above, write your own. Don't forget to call your congress critter. The TOLL FREE phone number for Capitol Switchboard is 1-866-220-0044. Just tell the lady who answers who you want to be connected with, senators or congresspersons, as the case might be.
 
As GOA has pointed out in previous alerts, this could lead to
millions more Americans being included in the FBI's database of
prohibited persons.
And millions of wack-jobs being in the FBI's database of prohibited persons is a bad idea because??? :rolleyes:
 
And millions of wack-jobs being in the FBI's database of prohibited persons is a bad idea because???

"Because" of how some of the reasons given for placing someone on a list can be abused, conveniently misinterpreted, you name it. Remember you are dealing with a system that tells you the Constitution doesn't mean what it says.
 
Uhmm erh... How are we supposed to complain about enforing the rules? Not saying I like it but how do we logicly defend the gov from enforcing the rules that are in place :confused:

Please forget the emotion, forget the people who are going to have a problem due to errors to quote my state representative when we were debating a certain antigun bill "we have to assume the competency of the courts". Again not saying I like it but he's correct.

Don't like the rule and the permanancy feature? get congress to fund the part of the ATF that was set up to handle such cases. Again I do not like it but that is the way it is.:cuss: :fire:

Again please leave emotion out of it for a moment. We are supposed to argue against enforment of the rules? One of the most common saying I'se seen on this and other boards is that "If you enforce the laws we already have we would not need any more laws"

Nomex/Kevlar/Forcefields/Shields ON

NukemJim
 
Text of H.R. 297:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-297

If you accept the existence of the Brady background checks and the NICS, then there is no 2A-related reason not to accept this current bill.

It provides for the use of 'mental defective' definitions already existing in U.S. Code.
It adds definitions for misdemeanor crime of domestic violence and actually includes a generous list of exceptions and exclusions.
Everything else is a means to improve communication and information flow between the many state and federal agencies involved.

If you don't accept the existence of the Brady background checks and the NICS, then the bill is a useless addition to a law that should be repealed and thus should not be supported.

The funding objections are valid regardless of your stand on the 2A issues.
 
"we have to assume the competency of the courts".

- We have to assume that Congress will do the right thing.

- We have to assume that the voting process will elect good people.

:rolleyes:
 
It provides for the use of 'mental defective' definitions already existing in U.S. Code.
It adds definitions for misdemeanor crime of domestic violence and actually includes a generous list of exceptions and exclusions.
Everything else is a means to improve communication and information flow between the many state and federal agencies involved.

It fails to address the scenario that lead to the VT shootings. Why is it suddenly so urgent? Pretending to be a solution is an excuse to argue for maintaining gun free zones at colleges and universities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top