Recommended scope power for 200 - 300 yards hunting?

Status
Not open for further replies.
most of my guns wear good quality 3x9s but are used for ranges a bit farther then you are going to shoot. I also like 2x7s and use them on about any gun that im going to set up that doesn't need to go past 300 yards. Truth be told in a pinch a 7x scope will get it done even at 500 yards.
 
Blade First hit it on the head. The IOR 4x is the most practical, best value scope in the high quality range of scope. Extremely well built and extremely reliable. Best 4x scope I have in every way and that is comparing it to my S&B and Zeiss Diavari 4x's. Low light visibility is incredible.

If I could have only one scoped rifle, it would have the IOR 4x with German 4a reticle. And I would be paying a fraction of what the comparable high end scopes cost. The rifle would be the Ruger Gunsite Scout. I am working on getting a Pachmayr Lo Swing side scope mount adapted to the Ruger for just this setup.

Best $360 you will ever spend.

http://www.midwayusa.com/product/63...4x-32mm-4a-reticle-matte?cm_vc=ProductFinding

Next on the list of high value, high quality scopes is the Minox 1.2 x 6 with the 4a reticle. Comparing this to my Swaro Z6 1 x 6 there is not $1500 difference in the visual experience. The Z6 is clearly better and the FOV blows everything out of the water, but the $500 Minox is very close and a hell of a lot more compact and lighter. Also I have discovered a red dot in a hunting rifle scope is a waste of time and money and I wish I would have bought the Z6 without this feature.

If you are on a budget the Nikon Buckmaster in 4x is a hell of a lot of value for a scope as is the 1x4 Monarch with 4a reticle. The weaver 1x3 V3 is not far behind it.

For hunting, anything over 9 power is not necessary or helpful.
 
I used to shoot a fair number of groundhogs when younger.
4-12X is my fave.
4 is decent for the close offhand shot, 12 enough for load development at the range (100yds) and not too much in the field. Less than 200 yards and a sporter, 9X is about it for watching the thump.
Some higher mag scopes get long and ruin the looks of the rifle.
 
One of the things I've noticed since I've started spending more money on scopes, the better your glass, the less magnification you need.
 
One of the things I've noticed since I've started spending more money on scopes, the better your glass, the less magnification you need.
This is definitely true.

I havent done much long range game hunting. My longest shot on game has been under 100 yards. However I am decently experienced at long range target shooting on steel.

When I was shooting a 12 inch wide by 24 inch tall steel target at 850ish yards my 3.5-15 power Nightforce was set on about 10 power. I sold my 6-24 power Viper PST when I realized I never went above 12 power. My current SPR build wears a 2.5-10 Viper PST which I think will easily cover targets out to 800+ yards. I was easily shooting 6 inch steel plates at 200 yards at around 4-6 power. I also did a good amount of distance shooting in the Army with a 4x ACOG.
 
One of the things I've noticed since I've started spending more money on scopes, the better your glass, the less magnification you need.

I don't have an unlimited budget for scopes and have found the above statement to be true. If my budget is $400.00 I've found that I can get much better glass with a 3.5-10x40 or less magnification than I can with a 4-12 or higher magnification. I also look for good low light glass over magnification. On my budget the Meopta Meopro 3.5-10x44 fits the bill. I have one on my coyote rifle, a .243, and one on a .270, both with German #4 reticles. Most of my non-rimfire scopes have the #4. IMO the most versatile scope on the market for at a price I can afford is the previously mentioned VX-3 2.5-8x36. I would feel confident putting that scope on any centerfire rifle I own. Another scope I really like is the VX-3 1.75-6x32.

Was also enamored with red dot scopes so purchased a VX-R 2-7x33 with illuminated #4 reticle. Great scope but have not had the occasion to need the illumination yet. I find the 2-7 scope to be very versatile and have owned a Fullfield II in 2-7x35. About the best bang for the buck I've ever spent.

Is it just me or do variable scopes have a sweet spot where the picture is the best? On my scopes it is usually around midpoint in the power range, so my 3-9's do best at 6 power.

I also don't think that what works best for me is what is best for anyone else.
Marlin%20336.jpg
My Marlin 336 wears a VX-3 1.75-6x32 with German #4. It is good for very close shots but is also great out to 250 yards which is the max distance I will shoot at game with this rifle. It's primarily a hog rifle but has taken numerous coyotes and a couple of deer as targets of opportunity. The 336 was my son's first deer rifle and had a Fullfield II 2-7x35. When he got his 30-06 he quit shooting the 336 and I commandeered it.

First thing I did was disassemble the receiver and polish the internals, all of them including bolt. Also added a Happy Trigger. Then I loosened the barrel band to improve harmonics and added a comb riser to get a better cheek weld when using a scope. Last I added the 1.75-6 VX-3. The rifle went from 2.5 MOA to MOA after all the work I did which was my goal. I now can take head shots on hogs out to 150 yards with confidence if I have a rest and can take a 250 yard shot on deer with full confidence and a rest. The scope plays a major part in my success because I can use it from 15 yards out to 300.

My main hunting rifle is a CZ 550 American 6.5x55 with a Conquest MC 3-9x40 but I would not feel at a disadvantage for 95% of the hunting I do using the 30-30. I'm 56 years old and have been hunting since I was a kid and the longest shot I've ever taken was circa 330 yards.
 
Last edited:
When a scope is used for hunting I always recommend at least a 9 power. It isn't for shooting, it is for being able to identify antlers when a deer is half blending into a thicket or behind bushes or something like that and I am trying to figure out if it is something I want to shoot. I never point my rifle at anything other than deer or coyotes in the woods but I simply don't have the extra space to carry binoculars as I usually hunt deep in public land and a decent set of binoculars takes up a lot of room. I keep my rifle scope set on the lowest possible setting and never turn it up unless I need it(in case a deer comes in right on top of me). That being said, I have never in 25 years of hunting seen a need for something as low as a 1x4 or 1.5x6, not even hunting in thickets. If I am more than 30 yards away from a deer I like to have my scope on at least 3 power(aim small, miss small). I have a Burris 2x7 on a rifle that I use in thickets and I have found myself wishing I had more scope power in the stand and a 3x9 isn't much bigger than a 2x7 but provides quite a bit more magnification. Keep in mind that sometimes, especially deer hunting in the rut, you will have precious few seconds to shoot a moving buck and I am picky and don't want to shoot a small buck because I couldn't see it's headgear good enough. Just my 3 cents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top