Redhawk safety interlock gone. Anything to worry about?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chuck Dye

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
938
Location
Oregon-The wet side.
The stainless Redhawk was worked on by a smith I no longer have confidence in and no longer have access to. Recently, the interlock that locks up the action when the cylinder is swung out has ceased to function. There does not seem to be anything else different, nor is there any apparent safety hazard. Does anyone know if this is cause for a trip to a (better) smith?
 
If ANY safety feature no longer functions, I'd be seriously wondering what ELSE might be wrong internally.

I'd very seriously consider sending the gun in to Ruger, or finding another pistolsmith to look it over.

Anytime any safety feature no longer works, you should start hearing alarm bells and sirens.
 
I agree with sending it back to Ruger. They may charge you because somebody modified the gun or broken something, but they could also just fix it and in typical Ruger Customer Service fashion, go through the whole thing and make it like new at no cost.
 
I agree, it needs to be checked out. Some of these morons take out the safeties to supposedly get a better trigger pull, the sad part is it ins't necessary in any way and if they knew what they were doing in the first place it wouldn't happen. There are lots of guys that hang a shingle and claim to be gunsmiths, but very few are any good. At best some are learning at the customers expense.
 
Problem solved.

After additional thought, the penny finally dropped: gradual, progressive onset means unexpected wear or a screw. The round count for this revolver and Ruger’s hell-for-stout construction pretty much eliminate the probability of wear as the cause, so I went screw hunting. There are very few screws. The crane latch pivot had backed out ¾ turn. A moment with a screwdriver and the problem is solved. (With a mental apology to the smith who did the trigger. :eek: )
 
The factory usually stakes the screw for the cylinder latch so it should not back out. Obviously it did so would suggest staking the screw, too.
 
The crane latch pivot is staked. That is why it only backed out ¾ turn and went unnoticed during inspections. The loss of the interlock function was first discovered when a friend and I were showing off the differences between the Super Blackhawk and the Redhawk to another friend, comparing Ruger’s single action loading gate safety to the double action interlock. When the interlock proved intermittent, the Redhawk was set aside and not shot until fixed. The "gradual, progressive" nature I described is the result of multiple disassembly/reassembly cycles and a lot of experimentation in my attempt to diagnose the problem. I do not normally attempt to cock a revolver or cycle its trigger while the crane is unlatched, nor do I normally try to open the crane while the hammer is at full cock. Discovering the flaw came only when I wanted to demonstrate the interlock. The interlock, at least in my case, is Ruger’s answer to a problem that does not exist. The movement of the pivot did not compromise lockup or timing, and had the pivot dropped completely from the gun, the gun have would failed safe: the latch would have ceased to release the crane. In a hunter/plinker the result would have been a nuisance only. In the end, I answered my initial question - it was nothing to worry about and a trip to a smith would have cost money better spent elsewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top