MatthewVanitas
Member
I just started reloading .32H&R, using .5cc of Blue Dot with a 78gr RN lead slug.
Just today I picked up an old Savage 340 with Weaver mounts for $195, in .222. So I went to see if Blue Dot could be used in .222 at all.
I'd been more hoping to find a .22 Hornet rifle for cheap reloading, low noise, and minimal barrel heat/wear, soI was pleased to hear that apparently Blue Dot has indeed been used with some success, mainly in reduced loads for .222/.223. These reduced loads apparently more or less replicate Hornet performance. So I can hopefully get low-hassle quiet shooting with small amounts (4-14gr) of powder I already have in stock.
Does anyone see any reasons why Calhoon's data would not be a good idea? I do understand that .222 is not the same as .223, but if I stick to 40 and 45 grain bullets, and stay away from the stated max charge, should I be reasonably safe?
Calhoon's chart is at the bottom of this page:
http://www.jamescalhoon.com/tobee2.php
Just today I picked up an old Savage 340 with Weaver mounts for $195, in .222. So I went to see if Blue Dot could be used in .222 at all.
I'd been more hoping to find a .22 Hornet rifle for cheap reloading, low noise, and minimal barrel heat/wear, soI was pleased to hear that apparently Blue Dot has indeed been used with some success, mainly in reduced loads for .222/.223. These reduced loads apparently more or less replicate Hornet performance. So I can hopefully get low-hassle quiet shooting with small amounts (4-14gr) of powder I already have in stock.
Does anyone see any reasons why Calhoon's data would not be a good idea? I do understand that .222 is not the same as .223, but if I stick to 40 and 45 grain bullets, and stay away from the stated max charge, should I be reasonably safe?
Calhoon's chart is at the bottom of this page:
http://www.jamescalhoon.com/tobee2.php