What can be done to reduce the subjective recoil of a 1911 in .45ACP?
In yet another gunshop (lots around here), I was remarking how my wife likes the 1911 manual of arms & shootability, but did not like .45ACP recoil...which was why we bought my wife a 1911 in 9mm. Mr. Gunshop Guy just about spewed his Coke over the counter in disgust and disbelief. He said that his gunsmith could reduce the recoil she felt in a 1911 chambered in .45ACP to be equal or less than the identical 1911 chambered in 9mm...and that the high-pressure nature of the 9mm made is less suitable to recoil/muzzle blast-sensitive shooters.
I expressed my doubts, especially since the recoil springs in 1911s chambered in 9mm are generally rated for fewer lbs than those in similar .45ACP chambered 1911s.
Gunshop Guy said that with the right springs and plastic-doohickeys his 'smith could make it a reality. He didn't seem worried about the buffers going south at the wrong time.
Call me conservative, but I am not sure I want plasticky doo-dads in the inner workings of a defensive pistol. Introducing more complexity and parts that wear out on a frequent basis seems like a Bad Idea.
So, is there any way to reduce the subjective recoil without:
1. Resorting to hunks of plastic getting mashed between metal bits
2. Increasing the 1911's weight some way
3. Drilling ports in the slide & bbl
I am thinking that no amount of fiddling with the 1911 innards is going to reapeal Newton's Third Law or its subjective application to my wife's hands & wrists (5' tall & less than 100lbs).
In yet another gunshop (lots around here), I was remarking how my wife likes the 1911 manual of arms & shootability, but did not like .45ACP recoil...which was why we bought my wife a 1911 in 9mm. Mr. Gunshop Guy just about spewed his Coke over the counter in disgust and disbelief. He said that his gunsmith could reduce the recoil she felt in a 1911 chambered in .45ACP to be equal or less than the identical 1911 chambered in 9mm...and that the high-pressure nature of the 9mm made is less suitable to recoil/muzzle blast-sensitive shooters.
I expressed my doubts, especially since the recoil springs in 1911s chambered in 9mm are generally rated for fewer lbs than those in similar .45ACP chambered 1911s.
Gunshop Guy said that with the right springs and plastic-doohickeys his 'smith could make it a reality. He didn't seem worried about the buffers going south at the wrong time.
Call me conservative, but I am not sure I want plasticky doo-dads in the inner workings of a defensive pistol. Introducing more complexity and parts that wear out on a frequent basis seems like a Bad Idea.
So, is there any way to reduce the subjective recoil without:
1. Resorting to hunks of plastic getting mashed between metal bits
2. Increasing the 1911's weight some way
3. Drilling ports in the slide & bbl
I am thinking that no amount of fiddling with the 1911 innards is going to reapeal Newton's Third Law or its subjective application to my wife's hands & wrists (5' tall & less than 100lbs).