Anyone wonder who this great sailor was who had the ability to be in the battle with a super high tech Brownie camera, then be on various docks, at Hickam Field, and fly around in airplanes after the battle and take pics of the damage? Oh wait, I am getting ahead of myself because the images posted here are culled. Let me start over.
Anyone else notice how the photographs from "A" Brownie camera tend to all look a bit different? How about the ones with the numbers written on them in white (#77 is printed backwards, BTW). When did the technology come in to handwrite numbers on undeveloped film inside of Brownie cameras? How about the lens sunshade on some (darkened corners) and not on the rest? Just what Brownie cameras had lens sunshades? Why is the resolution different on different images? Just how the hell do you get a superimposed watch image on a photograph shot with a Brownie camera? Moreover, why were the aerial images from the email left out. Oh yeah, it isn't likely a given sailor was going to be in the battle, there in the aftermath, and flying around as well. Why wasn't he fighting and helping with the recovery. Why wasn't he at his duty station on Quapaw after the battle? Y'all do realize that the Quapaw was a tug that would have been EXTREMELY busy right after the the event, right? With all those sailors in the water needing to be rescued, disabled ships needing to be moved etc. The Quapaw should have been on duty 24/7 and its crew not sight seeing the damage area. It wasn't like a tug would have enough spare crew to send one around sightseeing. FYI the Quapaw was commissioned in 1944!!!!!
GIMME A BREAK!!!
Of course Scrat isn't going to take credit for it. It was sent to him by a "friend" who in tern got it from another, and somewhere down the line somebody will claim to know the sailor who had the footlocker with the camera. The "friend" isn't named because he isn't a real individual person. He is many people and the photographs were NOT lost to time and not (not all anyways) taken with a loan Brownie camera.
Hell yeah they are great photographs, some of which were taken by professionals. They weren't found in a Brownie camera in a footlocker. They are archived photographs, two of which I have seen in books. Just because it is a war holiday of sorts doesn't mean everyone loses their common sense.
When you get these emails of remarkable finds or remarkable facts that are from unrealistic places with no known verifiable provenance, think twice.
Had such photos been recovered, Kodak would have been all over the press release, noting their contribution to history, the quality of their camera gear to withstand the march of time, and so on. Instead, we learn of such an amazing find via an email then posted on a forum. Sheesh.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/pearlharbor.asp