Remington 600 Mohawk (.308)

Status
Not open for further replies.

<*(((><

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
2,747
I've found a lead on a rifle (Remington 600 Mohawk in .308) that really interests me and would like to get some peoples opinions about it. I know some deficiencies that it has through some research such as:

1. Safety Recall on the Trigger
Solution: I will probably test it myself but in the end probably replace the trigger with a Timney Trigger with replacement safety (~$150.00)

2. Plastic Floorplate and Triggerguard
Solution replace with a Coquille Valley Machine Works CNC'd replacement (~$80.00 shipped)

3. I understand that most people say that due to the light weight of the rifle that it will have some significant recoil.

Why I want this is that I have an affinity for carbine length guns, and this seems like just the ticket for a good hunting rifle that is easy to carry and maneuver. I'm under the impression that the barrel is good for about 4-5 shots in a row before the groups start opening up. But the majority of people have said that they can shoot around MOA with the right ammo on a cold bore.

The fellow is asking $375 for the rifle and he says its in really good shape minus the fact that a previous owner scratched his Social Security # into the receiver just above the manufacturer's marks. The owner says it doesn't appear that it has been shot all that much. I know that most of these older 600's have been being sold more in the $600+ range, so it appear that if the condition is as stated it would be a really good deal.

Looking for any opinions on this particular rifle, and options on removing and rebluing the area where the SS# is scratched in.

Thanks in advance for the replies.
 
I don't plan on wasting anytime on this one of the condition is good. Do you have experience with one of them?
 
What are people's opinion on filing smooth and buffing out the SS# and rebluing? I've never used cold blue or anything like that before, is it something I could do myself or better left to a gunsmith? These rifles aren't necessarily a unicorn but it does seem like they have their collectors out there.
 
If it's in good shape I'd jump on it also. As far as the SS# if it's not terrible looking and the original blue is good I'd leave it. You can use a cold blue to darken it. I like Vans and have done the same thing on a couple .22s I picked up. AFAIC it's just part of the guns history. Get a good receipt from the guy so you have solid proof you got it from him. With that previous "owners" mark I'd want proof where I bought it. Good luck.
 
my wife loves her 600 in 308, i find it quite unpleasent to shoot but her dad carved the stock and its a short stock. Her dad didnt quite care for the short length barrel(noise, veloicty) but did love it for a box stand gun(its pretty short with a short stock and barrel). that price get it, shoot it, if you dont like it pass it along. most likely not going to get hurt at that price.
 
Fine rifles. I wish I'd kept mine. Light, handy, accurate and recoil is not that bad. Some years back a student brought one to a long range instructor course. He did fine with it out to 600 yards 'til he launched the top turret out of his scope. I loaned him a spare scope and he finished the course with my Leupold 6.5-20 on top. It did look a little strange, though.

For that price I'd jump on it.
 
As a hunting rifle there are better options in 2015. In the 1960's it was a short light rifle, today it is a heavy short rifle. The Mohawks in good condition are more collectible than shooters and the SN engraved in the receiver kills any collectible status. $375 is a good price though and I'd be tempted. But realistically $375 + new trigger+ any other mods and you can just buy a better hunting rifle off the shelf for less money.

I might buy it for $375, but other than a new trigger wouldn't spend a dime on other mods.

Trust me on the trigger, replace it. You'll get a lot of opinions from folks who don't have a clue how those triggers actually work. It is a design flaw. Most will never give a problem, but some will discharge with no trigger pull even after 40-50 years of perfect service and trigger adjustment is not the issue. If the internal trigger parts just happen to line up just right it will malfunction. I understand the odds are slim, but it is not worth keeping the trigger in any 600 or 700 series gun made prior to 2007.
 
jmr40, Do you think today's offerings on a carbine .308 would be as good of quality as this would be? I'm ignorant to such a comparison.

I'm guessing the new competition to the Rem 600 would be the following:

1. Ruger GSR ($808, impact guns)
2. Savage Precision Scout 20" (List $880, 2011 price)
3. Mossberg MVP Patrol 18.5" (MSRP $789, so probably $650 in stores)
4. Weatherby Vanguard Carbine 20" (MSRP $523, so probably $450 in stores)
5. Kimber Adirondack 18" (MSRP $1,768, so probably $1,500 in stores)
6. Remington 700 SPS Tactical (in stores for $625-675).

With the Remington 600 Mohawk the cost would be as follows:
1. Rifle $350-375 depending on owners willingness to haggle
2. New Trigger $150
3. CNC'd Floorplate $80
4. Picatinny Scope Rail $39
TOTAL: $619-644

It just seemed to me that the quality of the older rifles with the improvements of trigger and other items I would have a better rifle but that's why I'm posting here to get others opinions on that. Some benefits that I can see of some of the newer offerings are detachable mags, warranty and new. The only one of these items that I would enjoy would be the detachable mag, but that isn't as big of a deal to me for what the rifles use will be.

I'm not looking for the "constant reassurance that what I believe is the truth :) (but I know those you are talking about and it is frustrating to say the least)," but would like to know what others think. I will probably purchase it, but am always open to suggestions and insight that I don't have or am not seeing. And it sounds like if I don't like it I could sell it without loosing any money down the road.
 
Last edited:
I can't say what the condition of the one your looking at is but I will say I'd have no problem laying down the asking price after I tried to haggle a bit.
Can't think of a carbine today that will equal the quality or price.
I have regrets of not jumping on a 350 years ago when I saw one at a local pawn shop.
 
They are great little rifles. I put a mannlicher stock on one for a friend and man did it ever shoot great. Perfect little woods deer rifle...
 
I always have a couple 600s in .308. When trimed to 5 pounds they do recoil sharply, when left at 6.5 pounds scoped they are not bad, the stock was designed to dissapate the recoil. Jump on it at that price. If the plastic bottom metal or rib are intact, no need to replace the glock parts :)
 
.
Why I want this is that I have an affinity for carbine length guns...

You are not alone! My safe is full of short-barreled carbines, both bolt and lever.

Too, the 600 Mohawk was, in Jeff Cooper's own words, "Scout 1"...

Congrats on finding one at the price you stated. I like your plans for the rifle. Good luck!

:)
 
I had one in 308. Pretty stiff recoil and muzzle blast off a covered bench, not so bad offhand out in the open. Traded mine off to a 600 collector several years ago. I see them at shows asking around $600 in average condition these days.
 
This is my 660 model in .308 which has downed many game animals for me. I recommend this carbine to anyone seeking an accurate and well built firearm.

TR

660muley-1.jpg
 
Supposedly, the radically futuristic look Remington gave its 600/660 series of rifles "scared off" traditionalist hunter types, but I always liked them.

If I lived in Alaska, I'd be taking the short-barreled .350 RemMag model into the bush.
For the lower 48, it would be the .308 model.
 
I think I saw one awhile back that had a vent rib on it. Neat looking bolt action.
 
Unfortunately, what one persons standard of "really good" condition and another persons can be quite different. I passed on the rifle, it was too beat up for what I want, but I haven't given up on the Remington 600, it felt really nice in my hand and seems like it would be an awesome carbine rifle to carry around with great ballistic capabilities in such a lightweight and balanced gun. I'll keep this thread updated as I keep searching.

And thanks for the comments and pictures, feel free to add anything else to the discussion.
 
Buy it !

I regret selling the one I had a "few" decades back.

Replaced it with 2 Rugers [ American compact & RSR ].

It will kick you,but a light .308 is a bit of a kicker anyway.

If you pass on it for ANY reason = PLEASE post it here for us all to try and buy. WITH a pic if possible.
 
For a shooter cosmetic condition doesn't matter so much as mechanical. If the blueing was worn some but bore and action were well maintained that price still wouldn't be bad if you intend to put it to use.
 
For anyone interested, the rifle is located in Boise, Idaho. Here's the ad if you want to look at it. Remington 600

First of all, it is not a mohawk, it is the standard Remington 600 with the barrel bridge.

The top bridge on the barrel had a bend in between one or two of the towers attaching to the barrel, and then it had some pretty good scuffs and scratches on the stock near the rear sling swivel. I put a white card in the receiver and shined a light looking down the barrel and the rifling is in great shape. It is a definite shooter base solely on the condition of the barrel, I just wanted something a little nicer for my money on that, it takes a while to save up for a gun and didn't want to buy this rifle and not be happy with the condition and then spend the money on the items I wanted to replace to upgrade.

I went and looked at a Remington 700 SPS Tactical, it has a 20" barrel, and a nice hogue overmould stock. It is heavier, but has a heavy threaded barrel but seemed really nice and you can find those for around $625-675 so I think that may be the route I go as I would have had that much into the Remington 600.

Thank you for all the comments and please if anyone picks this up let us know and post some pictures.
 
Last edited:
What is everyone's opinions on the Remington 700 SPS Tactical? Seems like a decent shooter for the money. They make it with a 16.5", 20" barrel, or 20" barrel threaded, however, on the Remington website it has them all listed as weighing 7.5 lbs. average. The 16.5" barrel sports as 1:10 twist, and the 20" barrel sports a 1:12 twist and the 20" threaded barrel is 1:10 twist.
 
Thanks

I would make an offer if there was a link to the seller.
If its in the condition you state ,its a shooter and that is what I like.
All my guns are shooters and not safe queens,it actually helps if they have a ding or 2.
 
I'd jump on it !!!
My brother had one. Sold it in a financial pinch. Regrets it! Now owns a pre'64 mod '70 in .308. He (and I) still miss the 600. I liked it so much I now own three Mod-7's. Short handy powerful rifles. What's not to like!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top