Remington 710?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gunnerpalace

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
2,092
Location
Somewhere in Michigan
I read the old post of how this gun was garbage and I heard that Remington had fixed the problems like replacing plastic parts with steel. I was wondering if that was true as I saw 3 today at Gander Mountain for 300.00 with the standard Bushnell scopes(they were mostly 30-06),hoping that if they got better I would get one. Main reason being I like the already mounted scopes.
 
i think the 770 or something like that is the product improved version of the 710. its not in their 07 lineup except for a limited edition or two. if you really want it, get it. only 300 bucks, and itll make a good beater woods gun if thats what your looking for. dont expect it to make it to the grand kids, but i should work alright for a few seasons.
 
R.700 wanabee

The Remington 710 is the enrty-level budget lineup for Remington. If you are looking for a cheap gun to have fu with, take your money & customize a rimfire to match-grade (10/22). If you are looking for a quality big-bore (30-06 or .308) save until next year & get the Rem. 700 Sendero in bull-barrel with a good Nikon or Leupold scope... you won't be sorry!
 
Or, you could spend less money and buy the Mossberg 100ATR or 4x4 and get a better rifle based on the Howa 1500 design (and buy a better scope).

Ash
 
Im getting one of those that I saw at Gander as well, a closeout type for 265, with the scope. Can't beat that, especially for a beater.
 
If you are looking for a quality big-bore (30-06 or .308) save until next year & get the Rem. 700 Sendero in bull-barrel with a good Nikon or Leupold scope... you won't be sorry!

he will be if he wants to carry it a long way
 
They came out with the 770 (calling it the successor of the 710.) I'm looking at it in Rem's 2007 catalog. What's the deal with this gun?
 
Last edited:
I have very limited experience with 710's.....

but I have sighted in a couple for friends. My very opinionated view is this: Pick up a Stevens from a local dealer, without a scope, add Weaver mounts and a K4 scope. AFIK the Stevens trigger is adjustable as was the 110's before the accu trigger. ( internet instructions should abound ) I know I'd be content with such a set up.........Essex
 
Hey praharin... get a rifle-sling & quit whining... it's a rifle! Ever carry an M1... not too light either, but worth carrying. If he wants one that'll hit anything with confidence out to 500+ yards, how could he beat the R700? Well, an equal woudl be a Winchester Model 70 with a bull barrel. Want to lightern it up, get a fiberglass stock & fluted barrel. BFD
 
even with a sling, heavy is heavy. you dont need a heavy barrel to be accurate. i have an m700 mountain rifle, and its 3/4 moa for 2 shots in a row. then the barrel is too hot. i could quickly and easily put shots on target with it out to 300. beyond that, youre pushing the 7-08's capabilities, imho. for live targets you dont want suffering anyway. i can put a scope on an m16a4 and hit with confidense out to 500 yards, and thatll still be lighter than your sendero. 500 yards isnt too far out there. a sendero in '06 should take you to 1000 if you can handle it.

never carried an m1. done my time with a m249 (15#) an m240g (24#) m2hb (84# receiver and barrel) and a mk19 mod3 (72#). can you top 72 pounds unloaded (not including the tripod and cradle) with an m1? no such thing as a sling for the m2 or mk19.

just checked remington, you cant get a sendero in '06 anyway. i dont think you ever could get it in 308 either. its their long action magnum reciever. does come in 300 win mag though. besides, its a totally different class than the 710 and they shouldnt be mentioned in the same sentence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top