Remington 740 revisited

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rudy2281

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
18
This is a 'for what it's worth' safety issue post. I was an armorer in the military and worked on gas operated systems. I own and shoot Garands on a regular basis and weigh in on the cautious side regarding ammo. One reason for that is the 80 plus pieces of brass particles that reside in my right arm as a result in a out of battery fire while trying commercial ammo several years ago. I took the word of people who didn't know what they were talking about.

So when a friend and neighbor asked me to check his old Rem 740 at the range because he was having trouble getting it on paper, I not only paid attention to his concern that it might be his scope, I considered other issues that might affect performance.

He has been shooting Remington 165 gr Core-Lokt and I took some of that with me on my first trip out. I also took some 'safe' ammo loaded specifically for gas operated systems. I fired 4 safe loads (lighter bullets-medium burn rate powder and CCI#34 primers) and noticed nothing about the cases to cause alarm bells to ring. After several rounds, I got the rifle on paper and shot a couple 1 inch groups (100 yds) with a Sierra 150 mk. First impression was that a 150sp might be good for a load for hunting although he is going Elk hunting and needs a heavier bullet.

Then I fired three rounds of his Rem 165 which spread out to over 2 inches. But the thing that caught my eye was the popped primers and the amount of gas blowby over the case body. And while PRE is but one of several variables to look at, expansion of .005 is greater than anything my Garands have produced.

I should mention that I put in about 7 hrs of technical study and forum reading on the 740/742/7400/750 and found that opinions range widely on the part of owners on the rifle and ammo used.

Well, I cleaned the rifle (bore only) and took it back out today with the S150mk thinking that the age of the rifle probably had a bearing on what it is doing but that head space could very well be the culprit. But, I am strongly inclined to believe that the rifle really is not intended for any and all ammo on the market.

At the second firing the rifle had lost its zero, badly, and my conclusion was that the cheap scope was the problem. However, the safety issue really convinced me to tell my friend to buy a new rifle or get his to a gunsmith. On this outing, the last 3 rounds popped the primers and had severe blowby.

One of the other things I did was write Remington and the company correctly informed me that popped primers were a reason to get the rifle to a Remington repair center. But they also wrote that since all of their ammo is mfg to SAAMI specs, it is all safe in their semi-autos.

Hogwash. A gas system will not tolerate fast/slow burning powders and the very heavy bullet loads will damage the gas system if not the shooter.

That was confirmed by Hornady and Federal, both companies writing to tell me that not all of their commercial ammo is suitable/safe for semi autos.

The last part of this long-winded story is that, oddly, the guy two benches from me today was shooting a Rem 740 30.06 among other rifles. He was sighting it for his grandson for a hunting trip. I asked him to let me look at his cases and when we examined the primers, about 50% were popped and there was substantial blowby on the case. He was startled and concerned that he had not paid attention before. He also commented that his grandson would be using a different rifle to hunt with.

The point I guess is that if you are shooting a favorite old semi auto, don't assume that any ammo is safe in it-that's not the case. And if you've seen any pressure signs whatever, do what Hornady recommends; 'Stop firing immediately'.
 
That was a good informative post, thanks :D

I used to have a 7400 30-06. i shot handloads only (unless i ran out of components lol). Imr4895 and 165grn balistic tips went into the loads for the 7400, and 4350 and the same 165s were used in my bolt. I never noticed an issues when id swtich between the two, as id run out of rounds. I DID notice that my rifle would tear the rims off some corelokt factory loads which amused me to no end.
 
Thanks for your insight and your keyboard time. Often people get complacent and fail to notice potentially dangerous issues with their firearms or even their vehicles.



NCsmitty
 
FWIW, I shoot the core-lokt factory ammo and handloads out of my 750 and don't have any issues. It is supposed to have an improved gas system, though.
 
This is a 'for what it's worth' safety issue post. I was an armorer in the military and worked on gas operated systems. I own and shoot Garands on a regular basis and weigh in on the cautious side regarding ammo. One reason for that is the 80 plus pieces of brass particles that reside in my right arm as a result in a out of battery fire while trying commercial ammo several years ago. I took the word of people who didn't know what they were talking about
.


Could you expand on this? Maybe we could learn something else. What type of rifle and what type of ammunition, and what do you think caused the slamfire?
 
If you got a 740 to shoot under 5" you are doing very well. I assume it was a 30-06. It and the 742's are notoriously inaccurate in 30-06. I had a 742 in 30-06. Never got it to shoot under about 9". Many different bullets, powders, many different combinations, no joy. My DAD had a 30-06 carbine 30-06. It shot around 3". Best I've ever seen out of one. (Other calibers were sometimes better; had a 742 and a 7400 both in 243 that shot about an inch or less.)
I have owned several 742's in 30-06, (never owned but the first to actually use; only traded for them for something to sell or trade. They were very popular here.) sighted in many for friends, never saw one except my DAD's that would hit the side of as barn. People I used to shoot with called them 'slush boxes'.
Also this series had a tendency to have what my gunsmith called 'chamber cancer'. He said it only occurs in the 30-06's. The chamber can get a little rusted inside. A few pits and it is a single shot. As far as I know there is no cure except a new barrel. My wife's 740 has this, sits in the closet now; it was her DAD's. This condition causes it to pull the rims off the cases. Can be very difficult to remove. Keeping the chamber lubed with rust preventative would of course prevent this but almost no one that I know ever did this until it was too late.
I briefly owned a BAR; when I saw it looked exactly like a 742 inside I dumped it.
 
I've owned a couple of gorgeous old 742s in 30-06 and both shot most factory 150gr loads into 2" or way less at 100 yards, and shot 180gr around 2" (I know I wasn't supposed to shoot 180s in 'em). Never had but one ammo type cause any issues in feeding or ejecting, and that was 180gr Winchester SilverTips, iirc. They stove-piped every time. Everything else I ever ran thru it fed and ejected flawlessly.

I looked both over very, very closely before buying and I knew what to look for, generally. Maybe I just got lucky? But when I was in Vermont it seemed everyone and his brother was using either old 740s/742s or 760s for those big bruiser deer and elk. Some guys in the shops swore the whole family had used nothing but "grampa's 742 to kill every deer every put on the dinner table". Maybe they got lucky, too?
 
"Could you expand on this? Maybe we could learn something else. What type of rifle and what type of ammunition, and what do you think caused the slamfire? "

Garand, commercial ammo recommended by a licensed gunsmith as safe (since I was just getting back into the shooting hobby and had no milsurp), and as later ascertained, a defect in the firing pin and receiver safety bridge combined with flush commercial primers. The post explosion analytics were provided by a retired ordnance major who did work on surplus military rifles.

Naturally, I dug out all of my reference and training manuals from armorer's school and decided that before I got all excited about shooting, I'd take time to refresh the brain on the finer points of the Garand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top