Remington Arms and their new Huntsville, AL facility

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kynoch

member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
1,481
Location
California Coast
I have seen quite a few giddy and rather ignorant "pro-gun" articles celebrating the "move of Remington Arms" from Ilion, NY to Huntsville AL and I wanted to point out a few things that some or all the the articles miss:

* Remington is moving their Advanced Armament Corporation, Bushmaster, DPMS, Panther Arms, LAR Manufacturing, Montana Rifleman, Para, Remington 1911 and Tapco businesses to AL. Only the Bushmaster (which was earlier relocated from Windham, Maine) and Remington 1911 handgun businesses will come out of the Ilion, NY plant.

* The Ilion, NY plant has over 1M square feet of design, administrative and production floor space and it's full with Remington and some Marlin and some H&R production. At about 800K square feet, the Huntsville, AL couldn't even hold all that's located in Ilion -- particularly once it received the contents of the seven other aforementioned businesses.

* Remington is moving somewhere between 85 and 100 jobs (of about 1,500) to AL to support Bushmaster and Remington 1911 production -- less than 7%! Production output and employment is at historically high levels at Ilion.

* Given the expansion published expansion plans of Ruger and Beretta, it's clear some if not most if the Huntsville plant is intended for new growth. It would make little sense to fill it with existing business from Ilion.

* Many have said there is no reason to leave Ilion open. That's pure bunkum. Here's just a few:

-- A paid for physical plant of over 1M square feet.

-- Huge severance, recruiting and training costs associated with moving a large plant.

-- The actual costs of moving materials, machinery, finished goods, etc.

-- Horrendous clean-up costs associated with closing a plant that was built in 1915.

-- A dedicated and well-trained workforce.

-- The cost of product quality and productivity issues that crop-up when such moves are made.

-- Fewer members of US Congress (if Remington left NY) to do the company's bidding should it seek future gov't contracts. Even anti-gun politicos fight to keep/win jobs and contracts.

-- No further chances to take advantage of NY tax incentives and other incentives as it recently did when it improved the Ilion Plant.

-- In sum, moving a plant the size of Ilion during a historically busy business time for gun makers makes no sense.

* Some like to blame the hideous "SAFE Act" for this change. Keep in mind that this SAFE Act wasn't the work of Remington employees. Nor can it keep Remington from producing firearms in NY that are legal in other states. The Federal Interstate Commerce Law prohibits NY State from doing this.

Some need to consider things with just a bit more depth and breadth. While it might make some feel good that some Remington production is "going South", I like to think a bit further out where the SAFE Act is trashed and a business that has been in Ilion NY since 1816 through the US Civil War, WWI and WWII remains in place to produce fine firearms.
 
Last edited:
Kynoch, everything you said is true.

Environmental cleanup is very expensive. The cleanup of that plant and its grounds would likely bankrupt Remington. Redfield went under when CO mandated the cleanup of their factory.
 
Kynoch said:
* Some like to blame the hideous "SAFE Act" for this change. Keep in mind that this SAFE Act wasn't the work of Remington employees. Nor can it keep Remington from producing firearms in NY that are legal in other states. The Federal Interstate Commerce Law would prohibit NY State from doing this.

Some need to consider things with just a bit more depth and breadth. While it might make some feel good that some Remington production is "going South", I like to think a bit further out where the SAFE Act is trashed and a business that has been in Ilion NY since 1816 through the US Civil War, WWI and WWII remains in place to produce fine firearms.

Having seen a number of TV news reports and reading a number of written reports about the move it is clear to me that some part of the reason -- though NOT the only one to be sure -- is most certainly New York's "Safe Act." Surely it WASN'T the "work" of Remington employees (did anyone say or think it was???); it was the work of New York State liberal politicians.
As far as a large portion of Remington staying up there, sure, we knew that all along. It's called EXPANDING, not MOVING.
 
Having seen a number of TV news reports and reading a number of written reports about the move it is clear to me that some part of the reason -- though NOT the only one to be sure -- is most certainly New York's "Safe Act." Surely it WASN'T the "work" of Remington employees (did anyone say or think it was???); it was the work of New York State liberal politicians.
As far as a large portion of Remington staying up there, sure, we knew that all along. It's called EXPANDING, not MOVING.

That's why I posted what I did. I think that either the earliest news reports were wrong or they were purposely fed propaganda from Remington and from there the parroting spread like wildfire without a hint of critical thinking a long the way.

It might well be that Remington is being cold and calculating on this one. It certainly would make sense to from a business standpoint. Blaming the horrid SAFE Act (which cannot force Remington the curtail the production of firearms that are legal outside of NY) gives Remington great leverage with its union and with state and local governments when it comes to negotiating labor contracts and future tax concessions/taxpayer-funded gifts to Remington. Blaming the SAFE Act also keeps Remington from looking like the bad guy to its employees.

On the other hand the news reports are so hideously lacking that I think some news sources (particularly the "pro-gun" sources) are doing all the can to fan the flames and paint a picture of Remington completely pulling out of Ilion -- rather than moving less than 7% of its workforce. Not a single source noted that there's not even enough room to house Ilion production in the new Huntsville plant.

News sources also seem to be desperately trying to paint a picture of Remington moving production because of NY State politics when in reality the taxpayers of AL and Madison County effectively bought Remington a new (albeit used) plant and will bestow it with additional gifts along the way.
 
Kynoch said:
.... in reality the taxpayers of AL and Madison County effectively bought Remington a new (albeit used) plant and will bestow it with additional gifts along the way.

Well, Remington does have to meet certain employment quotas if it wants all the goodies. But these sorta sweet deals -- especially with taxes -- always bug me. Politicians keep hiking taxes on peoples' incomes and saying it never hurts or affects anyone really .... but then we see them giving corporations sweetheart deals with taxbreaks if they move to a locale. I mean, is THAT NOT "affecting" ....SOMETHING?:cuss:
I just hope it works out OK. Some of the problems with Remmie's new R51 pistol while not connected with this do seem to be "bad karma."
 
Well, Remington does have to meet certain employment quotas if it wants all the goodies. But these sorta sweet deals -- especially with taxes -- always bug me. Politicians keep hiking taxes on peoples' incomes and saying it never hurts or affects anyone really .... but then we see them giving corporations sweetheart deals with taxbreaks if they move to a locale. I mean, is THAT NOT "affecting" ....SOMETHING?:cuss:
I just hope it works out OK. Some of the problems with Remmie's new R51 pistol while not connected with this do seem to be "bad karma."

The employment quotas are fairly trivial unless the firearms market tanks which would require a Republican president in 2016 (good luck) and an improved economy ironically enough.

I agree, the sweet deals are problematic and the R51 is sewage. On the other hand Remington is doing some needed consolidation and the plant they are moving into was a white elephant that was on the market for years and I'm sure the state/county procured at a rock-bottom price.

Ruger pulled the same thing in NC, although their new factory will be less than 1/3 the size of Remington's AL facility. Only Beretta is building a new facility in TN, but you can bet they still received all sorts of concessions.
 
Many have said there is no reason to leave Ilion open. That's pure bunkum. Here's just a few:

-- A paid for physical plant of over 1M square feet.

-- Huge severance, recruiting and training costs associated with moving a large plant.

-- The actual costs of moving materials, machinery, finished goods, etc.

-- Horrendous clean-up costs associated with closing a plant that was built in 1915.

-- A dedicated and well-trained workforce.

-- Product quality and productivity issues that crop-up when such moves are made.


They said the same thing about Boeing Aircraft before it left Wichita, Kansas.
 
Colt in Florida.....

Colt's new factory in Kissimmee FL isn't a huge location but will put a lot of $ into the local economy.
Florida is a right to work state & unions/labor groups are as powerful or have the influence as in NY or New England(CT, MA, ME, NH).
Rusty
 
The logistical and financial challenges a gun manufacturer faces in relocating away from an anti-2A state are daunting to be sure.

It occured to me that one unmistakable way the ones who stay behind could express their contempt would be to discontinue imprinting the name of the home state on their guns. Instead of "MA", for example, Smith & Wesson and Kahr might simply substitute "USA". Why advertise the fact that you pay taxes to a state that hates you and your product.
 
Last edited:
so many look at the short term issues such as relocation costs, but few look at the long term costs of staying put.

the states where these guns and ammo companies are moving to have expanded the people's right regarding ccw and so forth, while the states where these guns and ammo companies are currently have increased the infringements and added restrictions on the people's right.

when should a guns and ammo company leave a state that restricts the people's right to buy, own, or use their product? should they leave after they have to pay export taxes to the state, when they have to allow state inspectors to review every shipment before it leaves the factory, pay politicians under the table for the "right" to operate such a facility?
 
Colt's new factory in Kissimmee FL isn't a huge location but will put a lot of $ into the local economy.
Florida is a right to work state & unions/labor groups are as powerful or have the influence as in NY or New England(CT, MA, ME, NH).
Rusty

Colt's Manufacturing has also been a very poorly run company since at least the end of WWII. It's been bought and sold to turn a buck. It's received gov't subsidies to remain afloat. If made very little investment in plant, property, equipment and R&D. It was involved in the longest labor dispute in US history with a fairly hideous union (UAW.)

In any event the 16,000 square foot shop that Colt agreed to move into in Florida is still vacant as far as I know.
 
The logistical and financial challenges a gun manufacturer faces in relocating away from an anti-2A state are daunting to be sure.

It occured to me that one unmistakable way the ones who stay behind could express their contempt would be to discontinue imprinting the name of the home state on their guns. Instead of "MA", for example, Smith & Wesson and Kahr might simply substitute "USA". Why advertise the fact that you pay taxes to a state that hates you and your product.

Why? I'm sure most S&W employees are fiercely proud of Springfield, MA and of S&W's long-standing presence in that community. That certainly doesn't mean that they necessarily support current state and local government but Springfield MA is still their home.
 
so many look at the short term issues such as relocation costs, but few look at the long term costs of staying put.

the states where these guns and ammo companies are moving to have expanded the people's right regarding ccw and so forth, while the states where these guns and ammo companies are currently have increased the infringements and added restrictions on the people's right.

While I don't believe a gov't entity can expand the peoples' right regarding CCW, I'm curious how you judge this to be a long term cost of staying put?

when should a guns and ammo company leave a state that restricts the people's right to buy, own, or use their product? should they leave after they have to pay export taxes to the state, when they have to allow state inspectors to review every shipment before it leaves the factory, pay politicians under the table for the "right" to operate such a facility?

hmmm... :rolleyes:
 
While I don't believe a gov't entity can expand the peoples' right regarding CCW, I'm curious how you judge this to be a long term cost of staying put?

ok, semantics taken into account, the gubmint "recognizes" the people's right.... and if you don't already see a correlation between the two very different state's mentalities I really cant help you understand any further.
 
ok, semantics taken into account, the gubmint "recognizes" the people's right.... and if you don't already see a correlation between the two very different state's mentalities I really cant help you understand any further.

No, it's not merely a matter of semantics. It's a matter of where certain rights come from. It's also not merely a matter of "recognizes", it's a matter of guarantees.
 
I can't and won't attempt to address most of the issues raised here but will offer a bit of insight into what those relocating from NY to Huntsville will find... It's a great town with a lot of addtional input from all the folks with other companies (mostly aerospace) that relocated there over the years.

Huntsville is the closest thing I ever had to a home town (an Army brat I -lived there in my teenage years before going into the service myself) and I still visit folks there regularly. I long ago left Huntsville but I still can't think of a better place to raise a family...
 
No, it's not merely a matter of semantics. It's a matter of where certain rights come from. It's also not merely a matter of "recognizes", it's a matter of guarantees.

so you agree with me that any gun and or ammo maker moving from NY to Alabama is better off because of the political climate. if you do not agree please spell out your differences. if you do agree ,why do you continue to contradict me with your paraphrasing?
 
I can't and won't attempt to address most of the issues raised here but will offer a bit of insight into what those relocating from NY to Huntsville will find... It's a great town with a lot of addtional input from all the folks with other companies (mostly aerospace) that relocated there over the years.

Huntsville is the closest thing I ever had to a home town (an Army brat I -lived there in my teenage years before going into the service myself) and I still visit folks there regularly. I long ago left Huntsville but I still can't think of a better place to raise a family...

Most of the companies in Huntsville are there due to gov't contracting associated with the Redstone Arsenal and the Space Program.

I can certainly think of some better places to raise a family...
 
so you agree with me that any gun and or ammo maker moving from NY to Alabama is better off because of the political climate. if you do not agree please spell out your differences. if you do agree ,why do you continue to contradict me with your paraphrasing?

I'm not paraphrasing you. I am correcting your comments. Please never suggest you can speak for me --"so you agree with me..."

I don't agree with anyone that any gun/ammo maker is necessarily "better off" because of differing "political climates." It's just not that simple.

NY State has not done anything that will hinder Ilion production.

In all actuality Remington is positioning itself to reap even more from the gov't troughs of both NY and AL. NY because it's afraid of losing more jobs and AL because it wants them.
 
Kynoch, show where you have "corrected me" with regards to Remington or any other guns and or ammo company being better off leaving NY or similar states for states like Alabama or similar states. next, I would never dream of speaking for you, I don't think I can be that convoluted.
 
Post #12.....

To answer post #12, the county bigwigs of Osceola County(Kissimmee Florida) reported the Colt plant was taking bids from small business owners & contractors a few months ago. The Orlando area media also stated Colt was moving forward with starting the factory site.

This subject was discussed a few weeks ago on the forum.
I'd agree Colt has been less than stellar re; labor relations, operations, costs/budgets, QC, etc. I even heard Colt took down the huge Horse statue that stood proudly on the HQ building for several decades. :confused:

Rusty
PS; Osceola County Florida is the 10th fasting growing county in the US.
www.osceola.org
 
Hmmm, I'd heard Bushmasters were being made at the LAR Grizzly plant in Utah, which Remington owns, not Ilion.
 
To answer post #12, the county bigwigs of Osceola County(Kissimmee Florida) reported the Colt plant was taking bids from small business owners & contractors a few months ago. The Orlando area media also stated Colt was moving forward with starting the factory site.

This subject was discussed a few weeks ago on the forum.
I'd agree Colt has been less than stellar re; labor relations, operations, costs/budgets, QC, etc. I even heard Colt took down the huge Horse statue that stood proudly on the HQ building for several decades. :confused:

Rusty
PS; Osceola County Florida is the 10th fasting growing county in the US.
www.osceola.org

Colt should have been moved in more than two years ago based on earlier news releases. Nice to hear they are moving forward.

The wooden Colt Blue Dome w/ Horse is now located in the state museum. It was replaced with a fiberglass replica that could stand up to the weather.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top