creitzel
Member
Rep. Thaddeus G. McCotter said:Dear Mr. Reitzel
Thank you for informing me of your opposition to the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act (H.R. 1022). Your thoughts on this important matter are most welcome and appreciated.
I agree with you
As you know, on September 13, 1994, Congress placed a 10 year ban on the possession, transfer, or further domestic manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons (SAWs). Since this ban expired on September 13, 2004, multiple attempts have been made in both the 108th and 109th sessions of Congress to extend or permanently impose the ban. Opponents of doing so, including myself, believe responsible gun owners must not be punished for the wrongdoing of criminals; thus, Congress needs to stop targeting hunters, responsible gun-owners, and gun manufacturers, and focus on the real problem: repeat offenders illegally obtaining firearms.
Nevertheless, Representative Carolyn McCarthy (NY) introduced the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act (H.R. 1022) on February 13, 2007. If enacted, this legislation would reinstate for ten years the expired prohibitions regarding assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Furthermore, H.R. 1022 would also prohibit the transfer of semiautomatic weapons, except through a licensed dealer or a State or local law enforcement agency. Presently, H.R. 1022 awaits in the House Judiciary Committee.
In the meantime, rest assured, your opposition to the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act (H.R. 1022) will be kept firmly in mind during the 110th Congress. Again, thank you for contacting me; and for all you do for our community and our country. Should you have any further comment or question on this or any other issue, please contact me at the Livonia district, or Washington D.C. office.
I work for you.
The emphasis was in his original letter.
Somewhat of a form letter, but at least he gets it. He's a good rep, and I will definitely continue voting for him.