dh1633pm
Contributing Member
Only advice I can add, if the gunsmith can return your pistol quickly, go elsewhere.
…I don’t understand the appeal of DAO…
…The springs, along with polishing the internals, improved the trigger pull a significant amount. Allows me to be far more accurate while shooting rapidly in double action…
Oh I understand the benefits of shooting in double action, what I don’t understand is the preference for a gun that is ONLY double action. If you don’t want to shoot single action then don’t cock the hammer, why invest money to remove that feature? I’m curious if there is a benefit to having a revolver that only operates in double action that perhaps I’m just ignorant of?The appeal to me is I learned to shoot accurately in PPC, the winners shot double action, only. At 50 yards my scores improved enough to put me on the winners platform. At 7 yards, I was putting all 12 in the X ring. The DOA allows me to control the trigger through the entire stroke.
I much prefer a proper polishing to messing with the springs but it seems you understand DAO,
Kevin
Oh I understand the benefits of shooting in double action, what I don’t understand is the preference for a gun that is ONLY double action. If you don’t want to shoot single action then don’t cock the hammer, why invest money to remove that feature? I’m curious if there is a benefit to having a revolver that only operates in double action that perhaps I’m just ignorant of?
Again, just truly curious if I’ve just missed something.
Oh I understand the benefits of shooting in double action, what I don’t understand is the preference for a gun that is ONLY double action. If you don’t want to shoot single action then don’t cock the hammer, why invest money to remove that feature? I’m curious if there is a benefit to having a revolver that only operates in double action that perhaps I’m just ignorant of?
Again, just truly curious if I’ve just missed something.
I just can’t see any real advantage aside from snag free concealed carry and the Situations that it may be required in a LEO role ( which is not the case for the vast majority)
Aside from that it seems like just a preference that offers no other benefits. Different strokes I guess.
Oh I understand the benefits of shooting in double action, what I don’t understand is the preference for a gun that is ONLY double action. If you don’t want to shoot single action then don’t cock the hammer, why invest money to remove that feature? I’m curious if there is a benefit to having a revolver that only operates in double action that perhaps I’m just ignorant of?
Again, just truly curious if I’ve just missed something.
OP, Rugers are very easy to take apart and work on. I worked on the actions of my GP .44 and SP .38 easily, I’m sure you could do your own work if you choose to.., it’ll certainly cost far less and take a few hours vs. months waiting. ( I’m five months in waiting for a Model 14 to get a barrel cut-recrown with no delivery date on the horizon.)
Yes. Theoretically, bobbing the hammer should increase reliability. Energy increases by the square of the velocity so, if anything, it increases the kinetic energy at firing pin strike.If the spring is putting out the same energy either way, would it just make the slightly lighter hammer go slightly faster?