Ritter cancels trip to Iraq amid reports about his past

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
OK, don't want to criticize his personal life- but isn't going to Iraq to help them avoid war bring up a little question of loyalty?





http://www.abc10.com/Global/story.asp?S=1094250

Ritter cancels trip to Iraq amid reports about his past







Albany, New York-AP -- A former U-N weapons inspector has canceled a trip to Iraq, after reports surfaced about his past.

Scott Ritter tells the Times Union of Albany, New York that he changed his mind about the trip. He planned to leave yesterday to offer Baghdad advice on how to avoid a war with the United States.

Ritter lives in suburban Albany, where area news reports had revealed he was arrested in 2001 in an Internet sex sting.

Police reportedly accused him of trying to lure what he thought was a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet -- but the charge was later dismissed and the records sealed.

There were also reports that Ritter had been investigated months before his arrest for a similar incident.

Ritter had served as chief U-N weapons inspector in Iraq during the 1990s.

Copyright 2002 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 
Scott Ritter tells the Times Union of Albany, New York ..... He planned to leave yesterday to offer Baghdad advice on how to avoid a war with the United States.

Seems to me that falls under "Giving aid, comfort, and counsel to the enemy"

:cuss:
 
A former U-N weapons inspector has canceled a trip to Iraq, after reports surfaced about his past.

There's a lot about this traitor that I don't like, however, *sniff* *sniff* the timing of this smacks of conspiracy.
 
There's a lot about this traitor that I don't like, however, *sniff* *sniff* the timing of this smacks of conspiracy.
Conspiracy on whose part? His? The charges are almost 2 years old and occurred well before 9/11 and our intent to confront Iraq. The fact that they are now becoming public knowledge is called investigative journalism, not conspiracy.
 
What I'm saying is that there's bound to be more to this than meets the eye. Here's a guy with a proven penchant for children. You gotta' know that he's been doing this stuff a lot longer than a couple years. He was the guy previously screamin' that Sadaam was hiding weapons and Klinton wasn't doing enough about it. Then, somethin' happens. Then all of a sudden, he's the guy saying Give Peace a Chance. An epiphany? I don't think so. Somebody has a lot of dirt on this scumbag and bought his change in views to serve their own agenda.
 
Police reportedly accused him of trying to lure what he thought was a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet -- but the charge was later dismissed and the records sealed.

There's a reason the charges were dismissed. It is illegal to go across state lines to engage in sexual acts with a minor under the age of 18 in violation of another chapter of law (specifically Chapter 109A of the Title 18). That specific law says 16 is the age. Most cops, and the judges who sign off on the arrest warrants, see the 18 age and forget to check the Chapter 109A part. It's one of those things were you'll spend 100,000 on lawyers trying to clear stuff up, because the authorities refused to actually read the damned law.

Now, if he was arrested solely under New York State law, that's another story.
 
I always thought it was 8 x 10 glossies that caused him to reconsider is original positions on Iraq. Looks like I was wrong.

Next question is who did the persuading? Obvious answer is Iraq. I think other groups are capable of doing so.
 
Just the other day, he said that was a case of mistaken identity.

Guess he's a schizophrenic pedophiliac.... :rolleyes:
 
spin and counter-spin

Ritter Says He Won't Be Silenced

Ritter says he won't be silenced
Bethlehem-- Ex-U.N. arms inspector reacts to revelations of his 2001 arrest; will continue speaking out against possible war on Iraq

By ALAN WECHSLER, Staff writer
First published: Thursday, January 23, 2003

Scott Ritter said he doesn't want forgiveness.

Speaking publicly for the first time about the sex charge he was arrested for in 2001, the former U.N. arms inspector and one of the leading critics of the Bush administration's plans to attack Iraq said he has been held accountable for breaking the law. And it would be a shame, he said Wednesday, that his arrest could derail his efforts to help prevent a war in the Middle East.

"I think it's important to put a human face on this, to remind people that there are issues out there bigger than a two-year-old dismissed case," he said. "I'm not asking people for forgiveness.

In June 2001, he was charged in a police sting operation with trying to lure a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet to a Burger King. Later in Colonie Town Court, the case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal after six months. Half a year later, the case was sealed.

"I was arrested on June 15 (2001) and charged with a class B misdemeanor," he said. "I think it's important for people to know that I stood before a judge in a public court, with my wife by my side ... and the case was dismissed."

Ritter, 41, a Delmar resident, spent Wednesday afternoon in a frenzy of television and newspaper interviews. He had been at the center of a national controversy that exploded this week when the arrest came to light.

A former Marine, Ritter served as a U.N. weapons inspector for seven years. He resigned in 1998, saying that Iraq remained a threat. He also accused the United States of damaging the inspection process by using intelligence from the U.N. to determine subsequent bombing sites.

In September, Ritter visited Iraq to urge Saddam Hussein to allow inspectors back into the country. Hussein agreed to do that a few days after Ritter left.

On Wednesday, Ritter said he's trying to put his life back together after the attention of the last few days. He declined to speculate on who may have released information from the sealed file.

"The timing is definitely suspicious," he said. "I have no insights as to who or why. I know what the impact is, which was to prevent me from getting on an airplane as I planned to do so ... to fly to Baghdad."

Ritter was to fly to Iraq on Tuesday to meet with the country's government, along with many other figures in the peace movement, to help avoid a war. Ritter bowed out of the trip because of the recent attention.

Colonie police Chief John Grebert said he did not blame any of his staff for the controversy. Though the case was sealed, he said, his detectives were not barred from talking about it, according to two lawyers he consulted. Furthermore, the case had been reported on Channel 13 in 2001 and many people were already familiar with it.

"This case is going on two years old," he said. "This case has been discussed fairly openly over the past year. A person who becomes more and more of a public figure increases the chance that anyone's going to talk."

WNYT Ch. 13 had the story on the arrest in 2001, but did not identify the man charged as the former weapons inspector. The station has said Ritter was charged under his given name -- William S. Ritter -- and the station did not make the connection at the time.

Ritter said this would be the last time he plans to discuss the situation with the media. He said he has been encouraged by hundreds of positive e-mails from around the country. His family is also with him.

"I'm very supportive of Scott, 100 percent or more," said his wife, Marina. "I'm very proud of him and everything that he has achieved."

Ritter and Marina, who married 12 years ago after they met in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia, are parents of two young children. Ritter said it was difficult explaining to his kids about what happened, but expects to soon put this behind him.

"I will continue to speak where I'm invited and permitted to speak," he said. "This will not silence me."

Staff writer Mike Goodwin contributed to this report.
 
Sounds like a modified Clinton defense. "What I do is far too important to The People for me to be sidetracked by those who would attack me for my personal life. After all, my wife is here by my side."

How much you wanna bet he don't get away with it.
 
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know whether Marina Ritter is a native-born American or a former Russian (or Georgian) who was naturalized through her marriage to Ritter?
 
Now, now, Blackhawk. He is not schizophrenic (glad you attempted the spellling because I can't). Schizophrenics don't have mulitple personalities--multiple personalities is just a neurosis. Schizos separate the intellect and the physical being (that's okay if you beat my body because you aren't hurting ME). They also tend to have a compulsive orderliness.
 
Right, Guy. His physical body was chatting young girls up while his intellect was pondering weightier matters of international consequence. Isn't that what I said...? :D
 
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know whether Marina Ritter is a native-born American or a former Russian (or Georgian) who was naturalized through her marriage to Ritter?

Marina Khatiashvili is a former Soviet Georgian interpreter for the American team that had monitored an arms control pact in Votkinsk. Her job had required her to report to the KGB. Ritter had been married when they met, but he insists that his romance with Khatiashvili began after he left Votkinsk. :rolleyes:
 
If he moved to IRAQ, he could probably have all the 14 year olds he wants.
 
"When you dismiss the case and you seal the files, ... it maintains the presumption of innocence," Ritter, 41, said in a Court TV interview Wednesday. "So I'm sticking to my ethical and legal obligations not to discuss this case. I wish other people had done that."
This guy doesn't know when to shut up. And there isn't an ounce of contrition in anything he's saying. :fire:

Scott Ritter's Presumption of Innocence

AP World Politics
Former U.N. weapons inspector says timing of arrest reports is suspicious
Thu Jan 23, 5:09 PM ET

ALBANY, New York - Former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, a harsh critic of the Bush administration's push toward war with Iraq, suggested that recent news reports of his arrest in an Internet sex sting last year were part of an attempt to silence him.

He said the publicity forced him to cancel a trip to Baghdad, where he said he would have offered an alternative to military action.

"The timing does stink. I was supposed to be on an airplane yesterday to Baghdad," he said. "Let's not forget, we're on the verge of a major conflict in which thousands of American lives may be lost, and I was a leading voice of opposition to this."

"It's a shame that somebody would bring up this old matter, this dismissed matter, and seek to silence me at this time," he said.

Ritter acknowledged his June 2001 arrest in appearances on CNN and Court TV on Wednesday night but said he was prohibited from discussing details because the charges were dismissed and the records sealed.

Broadcast reports at the time and recent newspaper reports have indicated he was caught in an Internet sex sting, something Ritter did not admit.

When the story initially surfaced last Saturday in The Daily Gazette of Schenectady, Ritter told a reporter, "Sorry, you must have the wrong person."

Calls to Ritter's home from The Associated Press went unanswered this week.

At the time of the arrest, NBC station WNYT-TV of Albany reported that William Scott Ritter Jr. — Ritter's full name — was charged with trying to lure a 16-year-old girl to a restaurant. The girl turned out to be an undercover police officer.

WNYT broadcast Ritter's mug shot provided by the police but did not make the connection to his role as the chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq during most of the 1990s.

He was charged with attempted endangerment of a child, a misdemeanor that carries up to 90 days in jail, according to The Times Union of Albany. The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, meaning if he stayed out of trouble for six months, the charges would disappear and the file be sealed.

"When you dismiss the case and you seal the files, ... it maintains the presumption of innocence," Ritter, 41, said in a Court TV interview Wednesday. "So I'm sticking to my ethical and legal obligations not to discuss this case. I wish other people had done that."
 
I would love to see a timeline of Mr. Ritters varied and confllicting commentary overlayed with his legal troubles and trips to Iraq.

Again, the obvious boogie man here is Iraq but I can spin a different scenario involving domestic influences.
 
Couldn't Happen to a Nicer Guy

Feds Obtain Ritter Records

Feds obtain Ritter records
Albany -- U.S. attorney's office to look into possible charges against ex-U.N. weapons inspector who was arrested in a 2001 Internet sex sting

By CAROL DeMARE and ANNE MILLER, Staff writers
First published: Saturday, January 25, 2003

Federal authorities have obtained the sealed records in the case of former U.N. chief weapons inspector Scott Ritter for review in a possible federal prosecution on Internet crime charges, sources said Friday.

State Supreme Court Justice Joseph C. Teresi signed an order unsealing the Ritter file within the several days after a request by federal prosecutors in the Albany office of the U.S. attorney, sources said.

"We have no comment," said Assistant U.S. Attorney William Pericak, supervisor of the white collar unit of the Albany office. Pericak and Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Spina Jr., who has been prosecuting computer crime cases for years, sought the unsealing of the records, sources said.

While legal experts said it's not unusual for federal prosecutors to go after information contained in state criminal files, the decision to examine Ritter's case is certain to draw criticism from supporters who feel Ritter is being singled out because of his outspoken views against a possible war in Iraq.

The June 2001 arrest of Ritter, 41, came to light over the past week in various media reports. He was charged with a Class B misdemeanor, the least serious state crime on the books, for allegedly setting up a sexual rendezvous with a person who he thought was a 16-year-old girl.

Ritter was unaware that he was chatting over the Internet with an undercover Colonie investigator posing as a teenage girl. Police were waiting for Ritter when he showed up at a Burger King in Menands to meet the girl. The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, meaning the charges would be dropped and the records sealed if he didn't break the law for a six-month period.

The deal was negotiated between Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser and defense attorney Norah Murphy and was approved by Colonie Town Justice Peter Crummey. Last week, Albany County District Attorney Paul Clyne fired Preiser. Clyne has refused to discuss the case other than to say his staff was told to inform him of all sensitive cases.

On Friday, Clyne was equally tight-lipped about the impending federal probe of Ritter.

"I can neither confirm nor deny the veracity of that report, primarily because you're asking me questions about a case that all the parties have acknowledged is sealed," Clyne said. "I can't comment on another law enforcement agency's dealings with a sealed file."

Ritter finally broke his silence Wednesday after days of negative publicity about his arrest, including reports he had tried to meet with a 14-year-old girl two months earlier, in April 2001, and was given a warning by Colonie police.

When Ritter resigned his position as chief weapons inspector in September 1998, he criticized the U.N. Security Council and the Clinton administration for having stymied the program. He has since become a major opponent of President Bush's plans for war against Iraq. He has traveled the country and gone to Iraq speaking on behalf of peace.

On Tuesday night, Ritter canceled a trip to Iraq because of all the publicity surrounding his arrest. He was dismayed that the 2-year-old Colonie case was revealed but refused to discuss the particulars. He insisted the case was dismissed and the record technically expunged.

Even in cases where state charges have been disposed of, the federal government can decide to prosecute on similar charges provided they are covered under federal law. It would not be double jeopardy, federal and state officials said.

A section of the state Criminal Procedure Law dealing with sealed records allows a law enforcement agency to single-handedly, without notifying the defense, make a motion in a superior court to obtain the records if the agency "demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that justice requires that such records be made available to it."

Now that federal prosecutors in Albany have possession of the records, they must obtain permission from the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington before they can bring a prosecution.

A possible federal case against Ritter could include the charge of using the Internet to entice a minor to engage in criminal activity, sources said.

Over the last week, former prosecutors have questioned the way the Ritter case was handled. Albany County's Clyne, while not discussing the Ritter case, said he would not approve of charges involving the luring of a teenager girl over the Internet to a sexual encounter to be disposed of as a low-level dismissal.

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Don Kinsella, who retired last year as head of the Albany office's Criminal Division and is now an attorney in private practice, feels Ritter may have gotten off easy.

"He was allegedly involved in what otherwise would be felony conduct, and it was charged as a Class B misdemeanor and disposed of and there's no apparent good reason for it, given the seriousness of the alleged conduct," Kinsella said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top