Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
It's not bad at all. Not knowing your breadth of experience, I don't know what to compare it to. It was more than an AR15/.223, but noticeably less than my .30-30's. Enough recoil that it's work to stay on target between shots, but not enough that it hurts.
The SAR-1 is chambered for 7.62x39, which has mild recoil. Less than .308/7.62 NATO, but more than .223/5.56 NATO. Much, much less than from a 12 gauge shotgun.
Its medium recoil as everyone is saying. The Russians designed the 7.62 x 39 to be a medium powered round, so each shot doesn't kick like a mull and thus you can aim easier during any kind of semi-auto or automatic fire.
Here is a question: What gun have you fellas fired that has an absolute brutal kick? (in your opinion)
Hardest-kicking gun I own is a bolt-action Mosin-Nagant M44 in 7.62x54R. It's ballistically similar to .30-06, but has a relatively short barrel and a solid steel buttplate. Lots of muzzle blast, too...
Fit of the stock has as much to do with felt recoil as anything. Worst for me was a Marlin 336 in 30/30. Not notorious for it's recoil, but it sure was tough for me to get a good cheek weld, and when I didn't, I knew it as soon as I touched it off. Had a Century made stock on one of my FN's for a short time that did the same thing. Not brutual amounts of recoil in the traditional sense, but it hurts a lot more when you take it in the cheek instead of the shoulder.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.