Commander Guineapig
Member
went to the gunshow this weekend...
and finally decided to pull the trigger (*groan*) on a Ruger 10/22
that has seen it's share of the back of a pickup truck.
I negotiated the price down to $125 for this gun in this condition:
- stock is in fair shape, no deep dings or gashes.
Definitely has seen better days.
-sights are somewhat thrashed...back sight is broken,
front one has a few mash-marks on it.
-bore is perfect. Action looks great. Clip seems fine.
Trigger is normal for a 10/22.
-barrel has some blued worn off and scuffs.
I didn't have the ability to pick it up right then and I gave him no cash,
just said that I'd come by his pawnshop on monday...today...and give
him the $125.
I am having some second thoughts tho.
I recently also picked up the latest addition of the "Gun Trader's Guide"
and it says a 10/22 in "good" shape is worth $130.
However good is classified in the Guide as:
"In safe working condition, minor wear on working surfaces.
No broken parts, no corrosion or pitting that will interfere with proper functioning."
Realistically, it's condition is more like "Fair" which is:
"In safe working condition but well worn, perhaps requiring replacement of minor parts or other adjustments that should be reported by the seller.
No rust but may have corrosion pits that do not render the gun unsafe or inoperable." (being closer to $100 or less in price according to the guide.)
So a new one is $180. The difference of $55 is a lot right now, squeezing my
money to get a Sig P228, a guitar amp, and either an AR or a Remmy 700.
The REASON for looking at a 10/22 in this condition is that I wanted to clean
it up and perhaps do a very nice camo job on it, and add a scope on the
existing scope rail. I wouldn't really want to "bubba" a nice new 10/22...
I'd feel bad about that.
He did offer to swap out barrels for me, but I really liked the bore of the
barrel with the busted up sights.
According to the guide, the gun in the "fair" shape is worth closer to $100 even. I offered him $100 (down from $150 originally) and he griped that he had almost that much in it.
My thoughts are that he either bought it for too much in the shape that it's in, or he's trying to charge too much, or both.
Or is the Gun Trader's guide way out in left field?
ideas? comments? thoughts? snide remarks?
GP
and finally decided to pull the trigger (*groan*) on a Ruger 10/22
that has seen it's share of the back of a pickup truck.
I negotiated the price down to $125 for this gun in this condition:
- stock is in fair shape, no deep dings or gashes.
Definitely has seen better days.
-sights are somewhat thrashed...back sight is broken,
front one has a few mash-marks on it.
-bore is perfect. Action looks great. Clip seems fine.
Trigger is normal for a 10/22.
-barrel has some blued worn off and scuffs.
I didn't have the ability to pick it up right then and I gave him no cash,
just said that I'd come by his pawnshop on monday...today...and give
him the $125.
I am having some second thoughts tho.
I recently also picked up the latest addition of the "Gun Trader's Guide"
and it says a 10/22 in "good" shape is worth $130.
However good is classified in the Guide as:
"In safe working condition, minor wear on working surfaces.
No broken parts, no corrosion or pitting that will interfere with proper functioning."
Realistically, it's condition is more like "Fair" which is:
"In safe working condition but well worn, perhaps requiring replacement of minor parts or other adjustments that should be reported by the seller.
No rust but may have corrosion pits that do not render the gun unsafe or inoperable." (being closer to $100 or less in price according to the guide.)
So a new one is $180. The difference of $55 is a lot right now, squeezing my
money to get a Sig P228, a guitar amp, and either an AR or a Remmy 700.
The REASON for looking at a 10/22 in this condition is that I wanted to clean
it up and perhaps do a very nice camo job on it, and add a scope on the
existing scope rail. I wouldn't really want to "bubba" a nice new 10/22...
I'd feel bad about that.
He did offer to swap out barrels for me, but I really liked the bore of the
barrel with the busted up sights.
According to the guide, the gun in the "fair" shape is worth closer to $100 even. I offered him $100 (down from $150 originally) and he griped that he had almost that much in it.
My thoughts are that he either bought it for too much in the shape that it's in, or he's trying to charge too much, or both.
Or is the Gun Trader's guide way out in left field?
ideas? comments? thoughts? snide remarks?
GP