Ruger LC9

[moxie]

97 guns,

You shot over a thousand rounds through that gun in just two sessions? Wow. I don't even do that much with an AR.

 

[97guns]

yeah, i dont get to the range often so when i do i run alot of rounds.

 

[LCPor9mm]

Nine is fine

The LC9 is a great little gun in all respects except one; The trigger sucks!
If you can get over that, then it is a bargain.

 

[97guns]

im one of the very few that really like the trigger. im no expert, not military but i own alot of guns and i do not feel comfortable carrying a glock or S/A so for me the long DA is great. i have no problem with combat accuracy at 25 yards and can even shoot rocks at 100 yards pretty good.

 

[LCPor9mm]

DAO Trigger

97

I don't have anything against the Ruger, and in fact my first outing I shot the LC9 & the CM9 side by side and actually thought I liked the Ruger better. I have been carrying an LCP for about three years so I was used to a long heavy pull, however eventually I came to appreciate the ease with which the CM9 shot and got rid of the LC9 and picked up another Kahr. I'll be the first to admit I need every advantage I can get when it comes to shooting these small guns and for me the CM9 is far superior to shoot.
Enjoy your Ruger, it's a great little gun.

 

[Jbabbler]

I bought mine within 2 mos of their introduction. It proved to be reliable. My only real complaint about the gun is that, for it's size, it could have a much more refined trigger. I get putting that trigger/hammer setup in the LCP but the LC9 has enough room to accommodate a nicer short reset DAO setup.

 

[97guns]

i am also familiar with the kahr triggers, i have owned both pm9/40 and totally opposite of you i have settled for the ruger. i do think the kahr trigger is better and i would buy a cm9 if it were available to me in ca., the pm9 i had was pretty decent but not 100% and the 40 was a jammomatic.

 

[Super Sneaky Steve]

I held one in a gun shop the other day. The trigger is way better than the LCP. The LC9 isn't a lot different than many double action revolvers, but I don't like the fact that it doesn't have a second strike capability.

I ended up buying a PK380 for my girlfriend instead. It's a wonderful pistol but it's not quite as small as the LC9.

 

[Jbabbler]

I held one in a gun shop the other day. The trigger is way better than the LCP. The LC9 isn't a lot different than many double action revolvers, but I don't like the fact that it doesn't have a second strike capability.

Take it apart, its the same design.


Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

 

[doc540]

No problem with the trigger.

 

[FireInCairo]

The trigger isn't nearly as bad as most imply. Yes, it's long. But you can still shoot it accurately stock.

 

[jimbo555]

Have over 3000 rounds thru mine without an issue. I replaced the guide rod with a steel one from Galloway just because. I didn't have a problem with the plastic one. I too felt the grip was too thin, I added a hogue sleeve. I grew up on revolvers, the trigger feels good to me. They come packed with a lot of grease from ruger, you have to give it a good cleaning before firing.

 

[76shuvlinoff]

I have a LCP and am thinking about moving up to the 9. Same trigger? I have no problem with the LCP trigger, in fact that little gun is surprisingly accurate for a nearly no sights pocket rocket.