Ruger LC9
- Thread starter aandrews
- Start date
Elkins45
Member
My guess would be because they want to move customers to the more expensive newer models like the Max.
My secondary guess woluld be that sales have slowed to the point they want to use the equipment for a different model. The new micro compact double stack guns like the Max have probably really hurt the sales of single stack guns. Nobody wants a 7+1 when they can have a 10+1 that's practically the same size.
Armybrat
Member
Probably because they thought they were progressing upwards with the Max-9?
I don’t know, but at least the EC9s variation is still in production….
www.ruger.com
I don’t know, but at least the EC9s variation is still in production….
Ruger® EC9s® Centerfire Pistol Models
www.ruger.com
Elkins45
Member
Also a good point. Once the EC9 was released it probably hurt LC9 sales even worse. For around $100 less all you give up is the ability to replace the sights.Probably because they thought they were progressing upwards with the Max-9?
I don’t know, but at least the EC9s variation is still in production….
Ruger® EC9s® Centerfire Pistol Models
Lefty38-55
Member
The LC9 was hammer fired and had a loooooooooong trigger pull, so they went to the LC9S, or striker fired one ... then to the EC9 etc.
Less the looooong pull, some did think it was one of the perfect sized carry guns, at least under small dbl-stacks came out, e.g., Ruger Max 9 or Sig 365, etc.
Less the looooong pull, some did think it was one of the perfect sized carry guns, at least under small dbl-stacks came out, e.g., Ruger Max 9 or Sig 365, etc.
HB
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 2,376
Very true. Especially when you consider mags and holsters. SR series, Americans, Security 9, P series, LC series, and I’m sure more.
bassjam
Member
A buddy bought the LC9 when they came out and I picked up the LCP. I could pocket carry mine, but the LC9 was too big. And that little 9 was snappy, it's been well over 10 years since I shot it but I still remember how it smacked my palm, a problem I don't have with my LCP. But I think it's biggest issue is most people don't like to shoot DAO guns. The Shield came out not long after and everybody wanted one. Ruger then made the LC9s variant but it was too late.
The original LC9 had a horrible trigger pull. The LC9s was much better. The EC9s is still on their website and is essentially the same gun with some money saving features. I assume they are still making it. I've had examples of both and if looking for that type of gun on a tight budget I'd highly recommend the EC9s.
George Dickel
Member
I tried out the LC9 when they first came out and I agree, the trigger was horrible, and I didn't buy the pistol.
Riomouse911
Member
The LC9 used to be my off duty gun. It was okaaaay, but not a world beater. When it was baking hot, the LCP II got the nod. Then I got a Glock 43X MOS for my 9mm ccw, and the LC9 was retired to the safe.
Here with its smaller LCP brethren. All have orange Testors paint on the front sights.
Stay safe.
Here with its smaller LCP brethren. All have orange Testors paint on the front sights.
Stay safe.
Elkins45
Member
There’s an argument to be made for the original DAO trigger of the LC9 as a pocket gun. That long, heavy trigger was unlikely to be pulled by accident.
Buckeye63
Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2018
- Messages
- 2,258
I agree 100% .. the trigger on the original LC9 was heavy when compared to modern striker fired pistols .. but when compared to a stock J Frame it was fantastic… it was much better than the KT P-11 .. which was the only semi automatic pistol that had me scratching my head
The LC9 pistols are definitely purpose driven
Cornhusker77
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 629
I had the original LC9. I liked the size and the feel of it in my hand, but eventually traded it in on my first S&W Shield.
The Little Woman has an EC9 and it makes me want one too.
The Little Woman has an EC9 and it makes me want one too.
There is very little difference in size/weight between the LC9s & the Max 9. There is about $50 difference in price between a Max-9 & an EC9s. If you are interested in an LC9/LC9s I would suggest taking a look at the Max 9. I like mine the only problem I have had was caused by my grip. Once I corrected it I have been fine.
Here is a link to a size & weight comparison between the Max-9 & the EC9s.
www.handgunhero.com
Here is a link to a size & weight comparison between the Max-9 & the EC9s.
Ruger Max-9 vs Ruger EC9s size comparison | Handgun Hero
Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger Max-9 and Ruger EC9s
www.handgunhero.com
WheelGunMan
Member
I carry an LC9 with that long trigger pull. I changed the hammer and trigger springs that allow a very smooth pull. I can also stage the hammer to bring precise accuracy to my shots.
I own a SP101 DAO that I carried as my EDC that had a similar trigger. I changed springs in that to.
I own a few striker fired pistols and some SAO extremely short pull 1911 style pistols.
I like them all..but prefer the longer pull.
It's all what you get used to.
I own a SP101 DAO that I carried as my EDC that had a similar trigger. I changed springs in that to.
I own a few striker fired pistols and some SAO extremely short pull 1911 style pistols.
I like them all..but prefer the longer pull.
It's all what you get used to.
Tallball
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 7,804
The original one had a pretty bad trigger. I owned one and learned to shoot it okay, but it wasn't fun. I traded it towards a G43.
The striker-fired version (LC9s) had a much better trigger. I got one for very little when they were going out of production.
My understanding is the EC pistol is the same thing, but with cheaper sights.
Ironically, it turned out I prefer this LC9s pro to the G43. It's a decent pistol. Kind of reminds me of a big LCPII.
The striker-fired version (LC9s) had a much better trigger. I got one for very little when they were going out of production.
My understanding is the EC pistol is the same thing, but with cheaper sights.
Ironically, it turned out I prefer this LC9s pro to the G43. It's a decent pistol. Kind of reminds me of a big LCPII.
Larry in wyoming
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2021
- Messages
- 611
My ex wife got an lc380 when I got my lcp. She could handle the 380 recoil better than the 9 or the 380 recoil in the tiny lcp. The lc380 was really fun to shoot.
WheelGunMan
Member
When I purchased an LC380 I installed McCarbo trigger spring kit. Night and day difference. It's still a long trigger but it's glass smooth. Liked the LC380 so much that I bought a LC9 slide and barrel from Ruger for it. Carry it in LC9 configuration with ARX 56 grain ammo now. It's highly accurate and such a soft shooter.
Larry in wyoming
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2021
- Messages
- 611
Now I'm sitting here resisting the urge to go on gunbroker etc.
conan32120
Member
Hickock45 called the lc9 goldilocks, and to me it is. It's not a target pistol by any means but in a close quarters situation with the adrenaline pumping sites won't mean much anyway, my goldilocks is comfortable to wear even in summer and I actually prefer the long trigger pull so I don't accidentally discharge it
WheelGunMan
Member
I wanted to mention with the addition of McCarbo trigger spring kit I can consistently stage the the hammer and trigger right before the break... this allows for a more accurate shot. I carried DAO revolvers for years and this trigger is reminiscent of their trigger pull.
dickydalton
Member
I still have my LC9S. I did the spring thing to it and it was always reliable. I just carry revolvers or small autos more lately.
