I know a lot of you have, and are very fond of, the Kel-Tec 380's. I also know that the Ruger LCP is pretty new and, have had some initial problems. I would be very interested in what those of you who have shot both think about how they compare. Interestingly, I bought the Ruger for $254 at KTP and the Kel-Tec was $229. At Cabelas the Kel-Tec was $269. Either way, price was not a huge factor. Honestly, I think that the Ruger looked a little nicer than the Kel-Tec. I also have to admit picking the Ruger just for the name. I suppose if the gun functions well, then I did the right thing. If not someone will surely say I told you so. So what do you guys think of the KT VS the LCP?