Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger LCP: Will it ever be CA approved?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Surefire, Mar 21, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Surefire

    Surefire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    737
    Location:
    Tampa
    Looks like a cool pocket sized backup gun. First one Ruger has ever made.

    Will it ever be added to the California approved list? If so, when?
     
  2. DWARREN123

    DWARREN123 Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,749
    Location:
    Between TN & KY
    When Ruger submits it and the money for certification.
     
  3. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    probably not

    I don't think it has the necessary safety features required for CA approval. so I seriously doubt it.
     
  4. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,091
    All semi auto pistols must have magazine disconnect (a liability) and a loaded chamber indicator to be added to the CA approved list. Guns without those features can remain on the list for an annual extortion fee, but none without them can be added.

    Most of the pistols on the approved list do not qualify to be added to the approved list anymore.

    Further the materials it is constructed from (glass filled nylon), and the low MSRP of $330, meaning it might go for under $300 new in places and half that used, might cause it to be labeled a "saturday night special"/"junk gun" not safe enough for sale in CA. :rolleyes:
    It also has small dimensions, further making the DOJ look for reasons to disqualify it.
    Low price, polymer construction, firing a .380 round (never be used for law enforcement) and highly concealable?
    They will do thier best to find it unsuitable.

    So not likely.
     
  5. roscoe

    roscoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,301
    Location:
    NV
    Have a relative from out of CA give you one as a present. It is legal to own them in CA, they just can't be sold. Giving a pistol is completely legal, if you can legally own a firearm.
     
  6. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,062
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    After CA DOJ denied the Ruger SR9, saying Ruger's LCI (Loaded Chamber Indicator) did not pass, Ruger has no intention of modifying (needs to add a magazine disconnect) and submitting the LCP for testing.

    Relative needs to be a either a grandparent, parent, son/daughter or grandson/granddaughter in order to qualify for the interfamily gift exmpetion.
    Uncle, aunt, bother, sister, cousin, etc. does not qualify for the interfamily gift exemption.

    Since the firearm is coming from another state, the firearm also needs to be sent to a CA FFL dealer and transfered to the CA resident in order to be legal. You can not directly mail/hand over the firearm, it needs to be processed by a CA FFL dealer. Otherwise you are breaking federal law.
     
  7. HuntAndFish

    HuntAndFish Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    523
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Ha. I'm wondering if anyone in California wants to adopt me.
     
  8. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,062
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    Not exactly true.

    It is legal to own them in CA.

    Since, it's not on the "approved" list, it can not be sold to civilians by a 01-FFL dealer.

    If you can find one in CA, you can still sell/buy/transfer them in CA via a PPT (Private Party Transfer).

    So, if you look in the used CA handgun market hard enough you may find one for sale for 2 to 3 times the MSRP.

    I believe the expected price point for a "used" Ruger LCP in CA is in the $500-700 range.
     
  9. icebones

    icebones Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    You ain't from around here, KY
    is it just me, or does the ruger lcp look A LOT liek a kel-tec p3at?
     
  10. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    icepak

    yup looks alot alike but one works great and the other--well??

    sorry heading meant to be icebones..
     
  11. guajiro

    guajiro Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    43
    Let me get this straight. If my father (lives in Florida) buys one and gives it to me, thats OK? If so, how does he go about sending it to me?
     
  12. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    komifornia

    u have to understand that komifornia is not a U. S. state:banghead::banghead:
     
  13. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,062
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    Yes, it is okay. Because it's an interfamily gift from father to son.

    First, you need a HSC or have an exemption to the HSC.

    Next, you need to contact a CA FFL dealer that will be willing to do the transfer. Not that many CA FFL dealers are willing to do it, so you need to ask around. Remember to tell the CA FFL dealer this is an interfamily gift and exempt from the approved list.

    After you make arraingments with the CA FFL dealer, your father overnights (FedEx/UPS) the pistol to the CA FFL dealer.

    You then go to the CA FFL dealer, pay the out-of-state transfer fee and process the DROS.

    10 days later, you go back to the CA FFL dealer, pick up your pistol and revel in the fact that you own a Ruger LCP in CA.

    Head over to www.calguns.net, join the forum and make a post asking for help in your search for a CA FFL dealer in your area willing to do an out-of-state interfamily gift transfer.
     
  14. guajiro

    guajiro Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    43
    Sweeeeeet!!! I am all over that. Time to start dropping hints to pops.
     
  15. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I doubt it unless Ruger designs a CA version to meet the mag disconnect, loaded chamber indicator requirements the state has :rolleyes:
     
  16. Surefire

    Surefire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    737
    Location:
    Tampa
    What was wrong with the SR9's LCI?

    I would never buy an SR9 or P345 because of the magazine disconnect design flaw in Rugers (dry firing can damage the gun with the magazine removed). I've never heard of problems with the LCI though.

    If DOJ is failing new model guns regularly, I bet the reason is that they don't want to approve any more new models until the dreaded microstamping becomes law in a year.

    If we get a liberal president this year, we could see these horse manure laws at a national level. :(
     
  17. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,062
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    LCI specs are in regulatory code Title 11 Sec 4060 (11 CCR 4060), implemented after SB489's passage:

    http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/chapter6.pdf


    (d)(1) A functioning chamber load indicator must meet all of the following conditions:

    (A) Explanatory text and/or graphics either incorporated within the chamber load indicator or
    adjacent to the chamber load indicator is/are permanently displayed by engraving, stamping,
    etching, molding, casting, or other means of permanent marking.

    (B) Each letter of explanatory text must have a minimum height of 1/16".

    (C) The explanatory text and/or graphics shall be of a distinct visual contrast to that of the firearm.

    (D) The “loaded” indication, that portion of the chamber load indicator that visually indicates there
    is a round in the chamber, shall be of a distinct color contrast to the firearm.

    (E) Only when there is a round in the chamber, the “loaded” indication is visible on the firearm from
    a distance of at least twenty-four inches. When there is no round in the chamber, the “loaded” indication
    must not be visible.

    (F) The text and/or graphics and the “loaded” indication together inform a reasonably foreseeable adult
    user of the pistol, that a round is in the chamber, without requiring the user to refer to a user’s manual.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2008
  18. Willo

    Willo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    87
    Location:
    CA
    I can see 90% of the guns on the roster dropping off
     
  19. DPris

    DPris Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,547
    Ruger says the LCP will not be sold in California.
    Denis
     
  20. Pfunk

    Pfunk Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Location:
    Oregon
    Many parts are interchangeable.

    Kel-Tec forgot to patent one of the most innovative handgun designs ever.
     
  21. Soybomb

    Soybomb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    3,959
    Not at all, they're virtually identical, the gun is of keltec design without a doubt.

    I doubt it was ignorance but perhaps just pragmatism, assuming there is something unique about it that would make it patent worthy. KT is a small company, how much money could they devote to a legal battle? Glock probably spent a tidy sum of money going after s&w, it took years, they had to resort at points to strong arming dealers into chosing between carrying S&W or glock. Could kel-tec successfully battle a company that is as of right now worth $176M? I think it might be difficult. If you don't want to waste your money going after small companies that rip you off like skyy and you don't have the resources to fight larger companies that do...why bother? Make the best product you can and hope your product and price will speak for itself.
     
  22. Pfunk

    Pfunk Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Location:
    Oregon
    Your concept assumes Kel-Tec knew they would be up against Ruger before they supposedly decided not to patent their design. Your timeline is backwards so the cause-effect you describe doesn't fit. It could just as easily have been another garage operation that decided to copy the Kel-Tec. In fact, I would have expected it more from a garage operation than a Ruger simply because with a copy, all of the hard and risky work that big gun companies specialize in is already done. And at that price-point, it was hard to predict a Ruger or S&W would be interested.

    Besides, the patent process is actually easier than designing their guns. And a patent protection lawsuit over a firearm design as unique and profitable as the Kel-Tec in question could easily be fought by a large team of ravenous lawyers on contingency. Or they could easily have secured all the investment in the world to pursue and win. It's virtually a no brainer, with a huge upside. It would have been a tremendous boon for Kel-Tec, with basically no risk.

    Your idea that their being a small company contributed to this mistake is totally valid. They either didn't think of it, or were too unfamiliar with the patent process to pursue it. Or maybe it was one of those things they always said they'd get around to but didn't, whereas a big company would patent most every unique idea they came up with.

    The Kel-Tec design is totally unique and, engineering inconsistencies aside, totally awesome. Fear of a big fight is no reason not to patent it because there's virtually no way to lose a fight like that, and it would have had the potential to double the value of Kel-Tec overnight.

    Besides, with a patent you can pick your fights unlike with a trademark. If you hold a patent and don't want to go after Ruger, you can still go after smaller companies.
     
  23. Soybomb

    Soybomb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    3,959
    Not really, pick a big company with money that you can't afford to fight, the name of the company is irrelevant. It happened to be ruger, but could have just as easily been s&w or beretta. The end result is the same. Pick a small company that isn't worth the money to fight even if you win, once again the name is irrelevant and the end result is the same.

    That has been done before too, see skyy pistols.

    Have you looked at the sales numbers kel-tec has? The unit cost might be low but kel-tec sells an amazing number of guns. Who wouldn't want a slice of that?

    Once again, to what benefit? How many pistols does skyy sell? Have you even heard of them before? What return would you see from suing them?

    We can speculate all day but at the end of it george kelgren has been designing things for many years. I don't think this is the case of someone just falling off the turnip truck and making a terrible mistake. I wish I were an IP lawyer and could speak with more authority but I would imagine that the design either is near enough to other browning linkless locked breech pistols that they didn't think it would be an easy patent to uphold or that they just never a benefit to them from litigation. In the gun world we see the same thing with holster makers.
     
  24. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    Pfunk

    oops started to double post..;
     
  25. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    Pfunk

    ur dead right. Kt just missed the boat. kinda hard to say sour grapes after the horse is out of the barn. They could and should have protected their design. I am told G. Kellgren patented his knife, now if your gonna do that why not patent something of value and quanlity.. Can't see to many people wanting to copy his knife but he protected it. He could have also sold his rights to ruger to produce the lcp to, and made big bucks and done nothing. All the kt guys want. to hate, blame, call Ruger a thief, u name it, the have said it, just becuase GK set back and let it happen.

    It has happened, now it is time for both sides to move on, Ruger ain't gonna go away, my bet is that taurus will be out soon with a mini 380 or 9mm and Smith also. then as I have said before, Let the games begin" If you make a great gun, you don't have much to worry about and if someone just passes u buy overnite, then you best start looking as to what went wrong..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page